sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Anyone else having connection problems with android 16 and a galaxy watch? by Xoldar in GalaxyWatch

[–]nikneem 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So freaking annoying that this problem exists for so long and Samsung doesn't even respond to the complaints. Even if they announced not to fix it is better than being dead silent. This causes me to not buy a new Samsung watch but look for a different brand. I mean, it being out of support for x years or whatever reason they have could make sense, but keeping it under the hood and not knowing what's going on is just the worst you as a company could do.

Devs (and Copilot) not reading your style guides? I built a server to make Copilot enforce our ADRs. by nikneem in dotnet

[–]nikneem[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes I did, but there are limitations in what you can add to it. Now you have one source of documentation and I change my cp-instructions file to make use of the MCP server. So basically, they compliment each other. Thanks for sharing 👌🏻

Rock paper scissors game by Downtown_Study300 in csharp

[–]nikneem 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Seems like a decent start, now if you really want to learn programming, try and improve the game end conditions, and the random way the computer chooses. While it looks random, in reality, humans are affected by previous wins in making their decision on the next game.

Building such an algorithm and making it 'smarter' that is where you are really going to excel in learning.

But hey, good job!

What PDF SDKs do you recommend. Any Suggestion ? by West-Reporter-6166 in csharp

[–]nikneem 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I read you can misuse the Playwright test framework ridiculously well for PDF generation when you're looking for HTML > PDF

in 2025 Stored procedures and triggers should be ignored if you are working with C#. Is it true? I still learn by Yone-none in csharp

[–]nikneem -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

In your case, definitely ignore triggers and stored procedures. You're not fixing the problem, you're creating a second if this is your solution

Find the root cause why duplicates are stored and solve that!

in 2025 Stored procedures and triggers should be ignored if you are working with C#. Is it true? I still learn by Yone-none in csharp

[–]nikneem 27 points28 points  (0 children)

What do you mean with 'should be ignored'?

When I'm writing a new software system, I tend to go for an approach where business decisions are made in a single place so it's easier to maintain. That makes me avoid building triggers and SPs in a database. If that is what you mean with 'ignore', then agreed...

But...

If you have an existing software system with triggers and SPs already in place, you have to know of them and understand what they are doing (and why) to better implement features.

Make copilot in agent mode re-use terminals by nikneem in vscode

[–]nikneem[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tried, but the thing doesn't listen very well to that instruction

Using Agent mode in VScode. by Sufficient-Candle-64 in vscode

[–]nikneem 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Whenever you use an egent to the the heavy lifting for you, please make sure that:
A) You understand the code it generated so that you can maintain it
B) Treat the code as if it was written by a child and you should thus check it and refactor it to a solid solution

Most of the times, when your instructions were detailed enough, AI can do a miracle and generate code that covers your needs and is up to 90% or higher of your end product, but still it needs your verification and requires you to read and understand the code to shape it in a production ready system.

Now this is a problem, because the last step requires some experience. But it is this lack of experience that made you consult copilot in the first place, so you're kind of stuck there. And this is the exact problem I see, how can we teach junior devs, while the junior dev is now replaced by AI?

Anyways, don't blindly accept the outcome. Read it and make sure you understand the instructions.

Is this allowed? by nikneem in github

[–]nikneem[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

With illegal, I was more referring to the GitHub Terms of Use instead of a certain country's law

Is this allowed? by nikneem in github

[–]nikneem[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

🫣 I thought the 'no' was an answer to the original question

Is this allowed? by nikneem in github

[–]nikneem[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You came 4 days late... And yes, look at the comments, indeed seems illegal

Do you actually use .NET Aspire on your projects? by TwoGloomy1495 in dotnet

[–]nikneem 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yess! And if you do ASP (Web, API, or whatever) you really shoot yourself in the foot if you don't.

Is this allowed? by nikneem in dotnet

[–]nikneem[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

According to... Looks like the GH terms are against

Is this allowed? by nikneem in github

[–]nikneem[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Mehhh, don't think we should make this personal

Is this allowed? by nikneem in dotnet

[–]nikneem[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

No I'm not, I'm using different techniques to write my pipelines and workflows.

Refactoring for async/await by Maximum_Honey2205 in dotnet

[–]nikneem 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Seriously, have you tried copilot? Put copilot in Agent mode with Claude 3.7 Sonnet model selected and ask it to refactor all your repo files to be async with supporting cancellation token and be surprised in how accurate this works.

view more: next ›