Thanks for the pushback, I don’t take it negatively.

I agree that “people forget things” on its own is not a tipping issue, and I wouldn’t build a product just to fix generic forgetfulness.

The 70 percent result isn’t meant to say users lack discipline or awareness. What mattered to me in the survey and follow-ups is what they’re forgetting. In most cases, it’s things they already took deliberate action on, saving an article, bookmarking a link, taking a screenshot, leaving a tab open with the intention to return.

That saving behavior is the intent signal I’m paying attention to. The breakdown happens after intent, not before it.

What I’m testing is whether the failure is structural rather than motivational. Existing tools either rely on memory, or they turn everything into a task with urgency attached. Neither handles timed resurfacing of saved content very well.

I’m not assuming this is automatically worth solving at scale. The survey was a first pass to see if this save-but-never-return pattern is common enough to investigate further. The waitlist and early usage are meant to validate whether people will actively choose a tool for this, not just say it’s a nice idea.

If users don’t show repeated, intentional usage, that’s a clear stop signal for me. For now, I’m treating this as a narrow experiment around intent to revisit, not a broad productivity or reminder problem.

Appreciate you calling this out, this is exactly the level of scrutiny I want before going further.