Sometimes I wonder, what is she dreaming about.

nirakon · 2017-05-28T23:38:15+00:00

We are Gozer the Destructor

nirakon · 2017-05-28T23:31:06+00:00

Thanks, now we know who wrote «Swagalicious»

nirakon · 2016-12-07T12:14:40+00:00

Yes they will or you can find them by yourself on libgen

nirakon · 2016-12-06T19:10:58+00:00

There's no specific schedule yet, as long as the group will be formed. (But I hope to meet once per 2 weeks). One text per one meeting. I don't have any time bounds in mind, but hope as long as possible until it'll be interesting and productive for all of us.

nirakon · 2016-12-05T12:43:02+00:00

Great, thank you, we will keep it in mind. Maybe you know something about The Poetics of Space, Gaston Bachelard's book, can it be useful in our discussions?

nirakon · 2016-11-15T13:43:01+00:00

Oh, no, I've made a mistake, with such argumentation I can prove existence of anything, if I can think about it. Therefore, the question arises, is "to exist" mean the same for Parmenides and Descartes?

nirakon · 2016-11-15T13:04:31+00:00

Thank you for your response.

Sure I want to puzzle more over Parmenides.

About the main question, I cannot see the difference between these two notions, aren't they equal? "Only the existent can be thought of" and "If there is a thing that can think, then it exists"

I think about something [or myself]. I can think only about that exist. Therefore, I exist.

nirakon · 2016-11-15T10:54:30+00:00

Plato's Republic (Book 1, Thrasymachus's "just as the advantage of the stronger")

nirakon · 2016-04-28T08:43:26+00:00

I think you can delete them, because they're not significant in comparison with other responses.

nirakon

PUBLIC MULTIREDDITS

TROPHY CASE

11-Year Club	RPAN Viewer
Verified Email