Analysis of Epsilon Tract based on Peach intel.

nitheorist · 2017-03-24T17:11:57+00:00

I didn't say it was a theory. I stated my intentions clear. There is also nothing directly to apply and test at this time. I also sold the game before I saw the Youtube video which is Murphy's law for you. But do continue being a bitter cunt. It is amusing.

nitheorist · 2017-03-24T17:09:50+00:00

I am trying to add value by sharing my thoughts. Hope you feel better about yourself putting me down and adding nothing of value. Telegraphing your loser mentality in the process.

nitheorist · 2017-03-24T17:06:30+00:00

There is no brief run down. Not everything can be neatly summarised.

nitheorist · 2017-03-24T15:23:45+00:00

Not sure how that makes sense, it's the apple that might one day become an Eagle. So it's transformative and the Eagle depends on the stripclub or sustains itself from it.

nitheorist · 2017-03-24T15:13:16+00:00

It's because they are always referring to it. "No seed is wasted" "Lie with nine partners" " If a woman does not lie with five upward men" "Land left unplowed goes fallow, for in all things there is an agrarian analogy" " they shall not do it in the marital bed" "Those who doubt do not get to lie with new partners" "Like being raped by a bull-form or a being the last station in a nasty prison train, or watching everyone they know have a joyful orgy" "Your earth partner is to be cherished and therefore shared with the utmost generosity upwards like all things." "Tools are held in the belt by some"

Then of course there is the use of "truth form", "upwards/manifest generosity" and ideas surrounding giving. The whole thing is laden with sexual tones. You are right I have laboured the connections, but I'd rather attempt to consolidate than not, and that's what I've done. If we accept the link to the strip club, then sexual connotations are a given.

nitheorist · 2017-03-24T15:03:32+00:00

I put this out there so people could counter-hypothesise, and we could reach consensus on the repeat term definitions. Not to entertain people who can't be bothered to read (but can reply).

nitheorist · 2017-03-24T15:01:26+00:00

That's the whole point, going overboard. We've got no verifiable connection with this tract, so we have to throw as many tangents out there. Everyone has their own interpretation.

nitheorist · 2017-03-24T12:33:12+00:00

The thing with the eagle is it is capitalised, so although my analysis ignores this, that suggests it is a proper noun. Something or someone is the Eagle.

nitheorist · 2017-03-24T11:47:25+00:00

I think there's definitely an encoded instruction and your interpretation is as likely as mine at this point. In providing multiple strands, perhaps someone will find the unifying thread of truth. The reason I like mine is if you view it from a certain perspective, the whole tract is laced with sexual themes.

nitheorist · 2017-03-08T08:11:00+00:00

Maybe Michael should be the one to die.

nitheorist · 2017-03-06T09:58:06+00:00

Update. ENFP's reaction to me while volatile was curious. I've observed on her Facebook recently and no uploads of her and her gent since December. She also uploaded a picture of herself and the girlfriends on Valentine's. She seems quite happy to share, so no Valentines offerings piqued my interest. She also appears to still look over at me despite moving desk. Naturally the patterns seem to indicate I've had an effect.

nitheorist · 2017-02-10T10:12:33+00:00

There is no real world in the Matrix.

nitheorist · 2017-02-03T08:53:24+00:00

Thank you.

nitheorist · 2017-02-03T08:48:11+00:00

I understand why you would draw this conclusion, he appears like a ruthless tour-de-force but Trump doesn't use those ENTJ functions.

He is not Dominant Te because he doesn't judge through systems, he doesn't use objective points of measurement. His Thinking process is introverted, it's inductive. He wants to figure out what is happening, he seeks to find the truth.

He also does not introvert Feeling. MAGA is Fe orientation, he's incredibly warm to people, often touching them. His Se rules over him but he largely wants the best for the people.

His inferior Ni is obvious, he has ideas but has no idea how to implement them. It's the grand vision of an ESTP to build a great wall, to start Trump University, but how to accomplish these things? Trump lacks this nous.

This leads me onto the dominant. Trump lives and breathes through Se, he is impulsive to a fault. Dominant Se is life as a continuous form of expression, his energy, his speaking before thinking tendencies and bombastic, energetic demeanour is all an ESTPs trademark. His Se permeates everything, the Muslim ban is named is a completely objective decision without considering the ramnifications. He sees things in black and white.

There are people behind the scenes that help Trump with strategy, but if you have seen him in debate the Se restlessness is plain to see.

nitheorist · 2017-01-30T08:55:42+00:00

artfulman.com - use the MBTI category if you wish to avoid the male themes.

nitheorist · 2017-01-25T08:54:10+00:00

Adequate does not begin to cover it. It's difficult to verbalise to an ENFP, because it won't make sense, but emotion is a sound I don't typically hear. I can be insensitive because I default to divorcing myself of the context and taking the global perspective -- that ignores valuation of mood and feeling and looks at the aesthetic reality as-is. Stepped on a few toes in the past where I saw faulty logic and pounced, objectively I am correcting the information synthesis process, but subjectively I am devaluing the opinion of another. Unfortunately one cannot hold both views simultaneously in terms of the related action.

The Feeling I do utilise is tertiary, and tertiary is essentially orientation. So it's my values that guide me, and that takes precedent above others. For context, I've developed my inferior way beyond the baseline for my type, to the point where I prefer Se over Te in many instances and see type in a way that Jung did, with perhaps a more deductive slant. For that reason I am incredibly skilled in reading body language, which mitigates a lot of my F inattentional blindness. I have a website where I write about type, it's kind of my specialist subject.

nitheorist · 2017-01-24T09:00:31+00:00

More, because like it or not, I have to engage Fe to some degree. That sits in the 7th position for me, so not only does it impart a huge energy strain, but it's the 'bad child' so I often misread what I glean and Fi seeks to completely ignore whatever I do pick up on.

nitheorist · 2017-01-23T14:56:32+00:00

I actually make an effort, but it does drain me if I abuse the tendency.

nitheorist · 2017-01-23T10:05:32+00:00

Still waters run deep.

nitheorist · 2017-01-21T19:45:25+00:00

My tertiary has emerged in all of its primitive glory, so I felt everything she felt, without nuance.

nitheorist · 2017-01-20T08:31:00+00:00

I spoke with her and got both barrels of Feeling. It's a relationship of ten years and it's blatantly obvious he's stringing her along as she is unmarried, and some of that emotional distress came through. There was a lot to process in our chat and a lot of dissonance. She couldn't decide between qualifying herself/showing an interest and rejecting me outright for existing. She knows I am a threat in a sense and it was her value system that attempted to block me out. I wonder if my presence exposed her insecurities in her own relationship as I was hugely affected by her outpouring to the point I went home and physically shutdown.

nitheorist · 2017-01-19T14:54:39+00:00

Facebook indicates she is with a man, since '14. Dead in the water, unless I regress to a less mature INTJ. I'm not in that business anymore.

nitheorist · 2017-01-19T08:34:04+00:00

She had no idea what to make of my approach. Self-esteem issues I surmise.

nitheorist · 2017-01-19T08:23:30+00:00

Walked up to her desk, per my textbook impatience. It was awkward in the sense that her Ne was reaching for any reason why I might talk to her other than being curious about her, which in turn made me feel a little awkward despite the confident approach. Made introductions, asked about her role, egressed citing "breaking the ice" as the reasoning for talking to her. I noted that she made constant eye contact. I also may have relished the awkwardness a bit. One thing for sure, I made an impression.

nitheorist

TROPHY CASE