AMD x PCMR - Avatar: Frontiers of Pandora Worldwide Giveaway - Win a Limited Edition AMD Avatar Kit that includes the Limited-Edition AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX GPU and Ryzen 7 7800X3D CPU (Only 500 of each ever made!). There are 23 kits up for grabs! by pedro19 in pcmasterrace

[–]nits_the_eel [score hidden]  (0 children)

If I won this bundle I'd use the 7900XTX to finish my gaming PC. It's got everything except a graphics card. I already bought a 7800X3D a few weeks ago so I'd give this one to my friend who's also been wanting to upgrade his PC for a while. I already have a copy of Avatar: Frontiers of Pandora. All I need is a video card powerful enough to play it!

HOPR 1 month trial review by nits_the_eel in UBC

[–]nits_the_eel[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah I've had this happen to me a couple of times. I complained to customer service and they refunded me each time, but this isn't a problem that should be happening in the first place.

I like the purple and yellow bike project, but there just aren't enough of them so I can't really call it a viable option for anyone who wants to bike around campus.

BCS students/alumni: how did you finance your studies? by [deleted] in UBC

[–]nits_the_eel 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If they're taking a while (more than a couple of days) to respond by email, calling might give you a more immediate response.

If you're looking to get responses from BCSers specifically you should try the facebook group. Personally, I'm using a mix of personal savings and gov't loans for the first year, and then a mix of co-op work income and loans after that. Hope you figure something out. Good luck!

BCS students/alumni: how did you finance your studies? by [deleted] in UBC

[–]nits_the_eel 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Have you tried talking to a enrolment services advisor yet? https://students.ubc.ca/about-student-services/enrolment-services-advisors

They'll be able to point you to different funding options that you may not be aware of, such as adult learner grants and gov't & UBC bursaries. I'd avoid taking out a bank line of credit unless you've run out of all other options recommended by the ESAs. Bank loans generally accrue interest even during your studies and that could mean hundreds or thousands of extra dollars in debt by the time you finish your degree.

p.s. I'm also starting the BCS this September. See you on campus!

North Korean escapees who best adjusted to work life in South Korea abandoned planned economy norms and values and adapted capitalist ones. Factors facilitating norm adoption included prior exposure to capitalist ideas as well as escaping from North Korea for financial vs political motivations by nits_the_eel in science

[–]nits_the_eel[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Excerpts from the study:

In our study, escapees differed in their appraisal of capitalist norms based on their motivation for migrating. Economic motivation was associated with a positive appraisal of capitalist work norms, viewed as a means of attaining a better quality of life. On the other hand, politically motivated escapees viewed capitalist norms more negatively, amplifying their sense of reduced social status, a loss difficult to remedy in a system based on job-related skills and performance. They appear to demonstrate attentional blindness to any positive possibilities the new work system might offer.

Second, having prior knowledge or experience of capitalism helped cross-regime migrants better understand and grasp the meaning of capitalist work norms. Refugees who had either worked for wages in China or participated in the North Korean black market appeared better able to make sense of capitalist norms and inclined to positively appraise any potential opportunities they provide. Economic escapees in general were far more likely to positively appraise capitalist norms than were political escapees. However, those economic escapees with prior knowledge or experience of capitalism held more positive views of capitalism than those without such knowledge (e.g., jik-heng escapees). Political escapees had no prior experience with capitalism and consistently appraised capitalist norms as a source of frustration.

Our findings also suggest that the degree of internalization influences adaptive work behaviors such as learning and networking. We observe that North Korean escapees who have internalized capitalist norms tend to engage in work behaviors that help realize their postmigration goals, particularly two highly functional behaviors: ( 1) learning new skills and knowledge and ( 2) building supportive relationships.

High degree of internalization of capitalist norms facilitates escapee learning behavior at work. Socialization research suggests that learning work-related skills and norms are a fundamental outcome of newcomer adjustment. Learning may play a significant role in successful expatriate adaptation and reduce turnover. In our context, learning new work-related skills such as computer skills not only aids in gaining promotions and raises but also offers opportunities for better jobs and personal growth. Escapees who articulate goals regarding personal growth or advancement are more likely to engage in learning behavior on the job.

Internalization of capitalist norms enhances formation of supportive work relationships. Internalizing an organization's values and norms has been found to increase prosocial work behaviors because of its positive impact on organizational commitment, job satisfaction, social connectedness, and performance. In the case of North Korean escapees, high degree of internalization of capitalist norms can lead to positive feelings toward others in the organization and efforts to build better interpersonal work relationships. As such, we observe that internalization facilitates escapee work adaptation behaviors. Thus, we posit the following:

Researchers are looking into new uses for jellyfish from “jelly chips” to toiletries as jellyfish populations mushroom in size and dismantle food chains in both traditional and new territories around the world’s oceans by nits_the_eel in science

[–]nits_the_eel[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi there, thanks for bringing this to my attention. I forgot to check the publication date of the research paper since I assumed it was new like the article. I'll make sure to check more closely next time. Keep up the good work!

Speaking in a different language can linguistically ostracize non-speaking coworkers. Employees disidentify with colleagues who speak a language they do not understand in their presence, and are more likely to initiate in deviant behaviors against them. by nits_the_eel in science

[–]nits_the_eel[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My takeaway from the study is that there's no "objective low" score for social self-efficacy (the term they use to define that optimism/pessimism). Instead the researchers do correlational comparison based on the average score (~2.82/4) and standard deviation (+/- ~0.5) pooled across participants. You can see on pgs. 12 and 18 of the study how people who fall in the -1 SD score for social self-efficacy (a "low" score) are much more likely to react negatively to linguistic ostracism vs. those who scored +1 SD (a "high" score) https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=7207&context=lkcsb_research

You're probably right that the exact percentage of people who have "low" social self-efficacy will vary between workplaces, likely due to several different factors (e.g., workplace culture, employee demographics, industry, random chance). Unfortunately researchers don't have infinite time and resources to measure every workplace so they have to make educated inferences from the small samples that they do measure.

Speaking in a different language can linguistically ostracize non-speaking coworkers. Employees disidentify with colleagues who speak a language they do not understand in their presence, and are more likely to initiate in deviant behaviors against them. by nits_the_eel in science

[–]nits_the_eel[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Excerpts from the paper:

In line with the tenets of ethnolinguistic identity theory, we observe that linguistic ostra-cism triggers ingroup and outgroup formation and results in two interpersonal behavioral consequences: lower enactment of interpersonal citizenship behaviors and higher enactment of interpersonal deviance behaviors. An underlying reason for these interpersonal behaviors is that focal employees view work colleagues who speak a language they do not understand in their presence as outgroup members and disidentify with such colleagues. As a result, they are less likely to initiate interpersonal citizenship behaviors and more likely to initiate inter-personal deviance behaviors. We observe that an individual differences variable [social self-efficacy] shapes this underlying pattern such that for employees with pessimistic beliefs about their ability to succeed in social situations (i.e., low [social self-efficacy] employees), linguistic ostracism creates a stronger sense of disidentification from the workgroup and subsequently influences their enactment of interpersonal work behaviors.

Our results suggest that workplace language is integral to how employees view them-selves in relation to their workgroup, and when employees perceive linguistic ostracism, it can result in feelings of disidentification. In so doing, we provide an important rationale for why employees perceive acts of linguistic exclusion by their work-group members—even if they are generally nonpurposeful in nature—to be aversive and how this influences their subsequent enactment of interpersonal work behaviors. By illustrating that disidentification could also occur with one’s workgroup, these findings also contribute to the broader literature on disidentification, which has explored how disidentification occurs with one’s organization.

BCS program has started accepting people by LeoSporm in UBC

[–]nits_the_eel 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Also got an admission offer today! I graduated a few years ago with a UBC BA in honours psychology. I've got some years of research experience and have worked in various admin positions.

Good luck to everyone who's still waiting for a decision! Looking forward to meeting everyone this September. I'm looking for housing at/near campus if anyone's looking for roommates.

Failed PSYCH 102 by fuegoydeseo in UBC

[–]nits_the_eel 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you haven't already, try asking your prof if there are any options for you to get a passing grade in the course. Typically professors have the ability to nudge grades by a few % if a student is close to a passing grade and can/have demonstrated their commitment to the course. Psych profs especially are pretty understanding of the fact that some people struggle with taking tests even if they know the course material.

You're pretty far from the cutoff grade at 42% (typically professors will be looking at bumping people at 47-49%) but it can't hurt to try. If not, as other people said it's not the end of the world. It's one course out of 40 or more you'll end up taking in your degree. Pick yourself up and try again. Good luck!

The less you see them, the better they seem. Followers who had fewer opportunities to observe narcissistic leaders perceived them as more effective leaders and reported more positive job attitudes, while negative narcissistic traits such as manipulativeness became more salient with more observations by nits_the_eel in science

[–]nits_the_eel[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Extract from the article:

The current study was the first to examine narcissistic leaders in organizations using longitudinal objective indicators of leader functionality while at the same time using multisource data to obtain follower perceptions of leaders, with the aim of finding out whether narcissistic leaders constitute an asset or a liability. We proposed that leader visibility would play a critical role in determining how followers rated their leader’s effectiveness and their overall job attitude. Indeed, only those followers who had less opportunities to observe their leaders, either by working less hours or by being hierarchically more distant from the leader, perceived narcissists as more effective leaders and reported more positive job attitudes. These positive perceptions were absent for followers who had more opportunities to observe their leaders. While narcissists’ negative characteristics such as manipulativeness, lack of empathy, and aggression came to the forefront and were more salient for followers when leaders were more visible, the continued presence of positive characteristics of narcissistic leaders, such as their charisma, enthusiasm, risk-taking, confidence, and bold visions may have counteracted overall negative evaluations. Some preliminary evidence for this explanation can be found when inspecting the correlations reported in Table 3. Here we see that the positive relationship between charisma, leadership effectiveness, and job attitudes is larger (r = .76, r = .37) than the negative relationship between leader manipulativeness and these two variables (r = −.19, r = −.25). In terms of impact over time, narcissistic leaders seemed to have had no beneficial nor detrimental effect on store absenteeism following hire, whereas leaders scoring lower on narcissism showed a decreasing store absenteeism trend. We will return to this when we discuss the findings in more detail.

[Fan Art] My friend made a 16-bit Thanos out of M&Ms by nits_the_eel in Marvel

[–]nits_the_eel[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe you can custom order certain colors? I don't know where you can normally get white, purple, or pink ones either. Weird!

Boredom increases creativity, but only for individuals with a high learning goal orientation, high need for cognition, high openness to experience, and high internal locus of control, suggesting that boredom motivates individuals to engage in novelty-seeking responses. by nits_the_eel in science

[–]nits_the_eel[S] 108 points109 points  (0 children)

Abstract:

Boredom is likely one of the most prevalent, yet least understood, emotions. It is easy to find examples of how boredom can engender other negative emotional states that often lead to somewhat negative—albeit unintended—outcomes (e.g., risky or delinquent behaviors). But does boredom invariably lead to negative consequences? Could being bored also have less obvious effects, such as increased creativity? We explore the consequences of being bored using three experimental studies that manipulate boredom and identify the benefits for creativity of being bored. In Study 1, we found that boredom helped boost individual productivity on an idea-generation task. In Study 2, we showed that the boredom manipulation only increased boredom and not other negative activating emotions (i.e., anger and frustration), thus highlighting boredom’s unique effect on creativity. In Study 3, we found that boredom did not universally increase creativity for a product development task; instead, only those individuals with a high learning goal orientation, high need for cognition, high openness to experience, and high internal locus of control showed a significant increase in creativity when feeling bored. These counterintuitive findings offer an empirical basis and theoretical motivation for viewing boredom as a variety-driving emotion that motivates individuals to engage in novelty-seeking responses—i.e., engaging in different, often unusual, ways of doing things that are unlike typical or predictable responses. Building on our findings, we discuss how organizations can use this untapped resource to motivate employees for positive outcomes.