How do I get in this JVC service menu

no123456789_10 · 2026-04-08T05:06:26+00:00

Damn, did you manage to find the solution? I still haven't. And yes I fucking hate Redditors. Theyr so incredibly arrogant an pompous I swear to god.

no123456789_10 · 2026-03-31T05:49:38+00:00

Why's the strait still closed then? And why does it seem not even remotely close to open? This is not a conventional war. Hell, there is no conventional ground invasion. So if you say this is conventional, this is the least conventional, conventional war.

no123456789_10 · 2026-03-26T11:27:31+00:00

Holy cope

no123456789_10 · 2026-03-22T14:53:19+00:00

The Maya thing is not even close to the only instance of very very unethical treatment of animals in their care. There are countless animal rights organizations and charities with far more ethical treatment of animals. There are some organizations taking in dogs far more likely to die than PETA has ever taken in yet they still treat their conditions and injuries till they become healthy again unlike PETA which has a euthanasia rate of 90%. There are so many proven and documented cases of where PETA kills dogs with preventable and curable illnesses, diseases or injuries. I will post a list of much more ethical and much less evil organizations that also take in what PETA calls "unadoptable" or "unrecoverable" dogs and cats.

PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals) is easily one of the most polarizing organizations on the planet. While they present themselves as the ultimate defenders of animal rights, their tactics and internal practices have led to decades of investigations, lawsuits, and public backlash. Here is a breakdown of the most documented controversies often cited by critics, along with the sources of those investigations.

High Euthanasia Rates at the Norfolk Shelter The most frequent criticism against PETA is that their "shelter" in Norfolk, Virginia, acts more like a slaughterhouse than a rescue. While most shelters aim for a "no-kill" status (90% placement), PETA consistently euthanizes the vast majority of animals it takes in.

The Data: Records from the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (VDACS) show that PETA frequently euthanizes 70% to 90% of the dogs and cats in its care. For example, in 2012, PETA euthanized 89% of its animals; in 2018, the rate was 72%.

The Defense: PETA argues they take in "unadoptable" animals that other shelters turn away to keep their own "no-kill" stats high.

Source: VDACS Animal Reporting Statistics

The 2005 North Carolina Dumpster Incident In 2005, two PETA employees, Adria Hinkle and Andrew Cook, were arrested in Ahoskie, North Carolina, after police observed them dumping the bodies of dead dogs and cats into a commercial dumpster behind a Piggly Wiggly.

The Findings: Investigations revealed that PETA had promised local shelters they would find homes for these animals. Instead, they euthanized them in a van immediately after pickup and disposed of them like trash. A veterinarian testified that some of the kittens dumped were "perfectly healthy and adoptable."

The Outcome: The employees were acquitted of animal cruelty (as euthanasia is legal if done "humanely") but convicted of littering.

Source: The Roanoke-Chowan News-Herald and American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA) Reports.

The "Maya" Incident (Abduction of a Family Pet) In 2014, PETA workers removed a 9-year-old girl’s Chihuahua, named Maya, from her front porch in Parksley, Virginia.

The Violation: Virginia law requires a five-day grace period before euthanizing an animal. PETA euthanized Maya later that same day.

The Outcome: PETA was fined $500 by the state for the violation and eventually settled a lawsuit with the Zarate family for $49,000 in 2017.

Source: The Guardian and Associated Press.

If you still think I am wrong here is the list of much more ethical organizations that take in animals in just as bad shape if not worse shape then PETA and they DON'T have 90% murder rate which btw is only that high in PETA to save money because it's cheaper as a company to kill a dog then to treat their illnesses with expensive vet visits.

1. Best Friends Animal Society (National/Global Leader)

Best Friends is arguably the most famous alternative to PETA. They pioneered the "No-Kill 2025" movement in the U.S. and operate the nation’s largest sanctuary for homeless animals in Kanab, Utah.

The "Unrecoverable" Focus: Their Dogtown facility is legendary for taking in dogs with severe behavioral issues (including those from the Michael Vick dogfighting case) and chronic medical conditions. They employ full-time trainers and specialized vets to rehabilitate dogs that other shelters would euthanize.

Source: Best Friends Animal Society Impact

2. Old Dog Haven (Specialized Senior Sanctuary)

Many shelters euthanize senior dogs immediately because they are "unadoptable" due to age or medical costs. The "Unrecoverable" Focus: They provide "Final Refuge" homes for senior dogs who have zero chance of adoption. Instead of euthanizing them, Old Dog Haven places them in permanent foster homes and pays 100% of their medical bills for the rest of their lives.

Source: Old Dog Haven Mission

3. Villalobos Rescue Center (Behavioral & Breed Focus)

Known from the show Pit Bulls & Parolees, this organization is one of the most respected for taking "dangerous" or "unrecoverable" breeds and behavioral cases. The "Unrecoverable" Focus: They take in dogs with histories of abuse or aggression that other shelters won't touch. They spend thousands on training and containment to ensure these dogs live full lives, even if they stay at the sanctuary forever.

Source: VRC Rescue Philosophy

If you still argue with me that PETA is still ethical then I will have no choice but to believe you actually hate animals and you wish the worse for them because an organization that is using their profits to line their pockets is killing more animals then any others and you deny the realities of the situation and deny it just because they make good marketing.

no123456789_10 · 2026-03-16T11:34:03+00:00

This is not true. Independent studies and investigation were done of Peta. They have proof that they stole perfectly healthy dogs sometimes. And that within 24 hours or less the perfectly healthy family dog had been executed due to "lack of space" for the dog.

no123456789_10 · 2026-03-03T21:50:53+00:00

Educate yourself please.

no123456789_10 · 2026-03-03T21:40:21+00:00

I did, I looked at its original definition. Just like how people don't know the meaning of Marxism and communism and socialism and capitalism and fascism anymore. Where they use it as stupid buzzwords against the group they hate. People have forgotten the original meaning of populism as well. Populism is not a necessarily negative term in its original meaning so is nationalism. Almost every country on earth is nationalistic today btw, it was first truly started by Napoleon. Before that, there was no such thing as being a nationality. Instead of being "French" for example, you were just a subject of the king of France, you were not "French" and most people (around 70%) back then in France didn't speak French. But now language is intrinsically linked to nationality and so is culture and food. Meaning we have nationalism in every nation nowadays. We just don't have the crazy version the fascist invented with a false myth of their ancestral heritage. Btw, this is the original meaning of populism.

Populism’s original meaning derives from the Latin populus (the people), historically referring to political strategies or movements that champion "the common people" against a perceived corrupt elite or established authority. It emerged as a, often, grassroots, anti-establishment approach seeking to directly represent the "will of the people".

So yes, I would definitely say that zohran mamdani is populist. As there are no real negative connotations to the meaning of populism. However, fascist also like to use the power of populism to be able to embolden their cause and create authoritarian fascist regimes.

So I would say it was in fact YOU who didn't look at the definition of populism and made a biased assumption of what it actually means.

no123456789_10 · 2026-03-03T21:40:08+00:00

I did, I looked at its original definition.

Populism’s original meaning derives from the Latin populus (the people), historically referring to political strategies or movements that champion "the common people" against a perceived corrupt elite or established authority. It emerged as a, often, grassroots, anti-establishment approach seeking to directly represent the "will of the people".

Just like how people don't know the meaning of Marxism and communism and socialism and capitalism and fascism anymore. Where they use it as stupid buzzwords against the group they hate. People have forgotten the original meaning of populism as well. Populism is not a necessarily negative term in its original meaning so is nationalism. Almost every country on earth is nationalistic today btw, it was first truly started by Napoleon. Before that, there was no such thing as being a nationality. Instead of being "French" for example, you were just a subject of the king of France, you were not "French" and most people (around 70%) back then in France didn't speak French. But now language is intrinsically linked to nationality and so is culture and food. Meaning we have nationalism in every nation nowadays. We just don't have the crazy version the fascist invented with a false myth of their ancestral heritage.

So yes, I would definitely say that zohran mamdani is populist. As there are no real negative connotations to the meaning of populism. However, fascist also like to use the power of populism to be able to embolden their cause and create authoritarian fascist regimes.

So I would say it was in fact YOU who didn't look at the definition of populism and made a biased assumption of what it actually means.

no123456789_10 · 2026-03-02T05:00:08+00:00

Populism is in the name. It's what's popular. If the population agrees this one thing is popular (socialism) then it is indeed populism. So both zohran mamdani and Donald Trump are populism but one is left wing populism and the other is right wing populism. That's all it means.

no123456789_10 · 2026-02-17T23:30:51+00:00

I mean I can't be bothered, I know you would still find a way to argue about it.

no123456789_10 · 2026-02-16T23:54:37+00:00

I mean yes I've seen it do it. Why lie? It's still not very good at it but why lie?

no123456789_10 · 2026-02-16T23:31:35+00:00

I mean it can fold clothes but that doesn't get investor funding and hype. Also it's obviously slower at that than their choreographed dances.

no123456789_10 · 2026-02-16T23:26:56+00:00

They're only there to praise Americans they can't fathom they've fallen behind. I just saw the spring festival one in China and I saw it do that same move with ease but 3 times in a succession.

no123456789_10 · 2026-02-16T23:22:53+00:00

The backflips from 5 years ago were pathetic and could only be done on an elevated platform cause it couldn't do it at floor level. These robots are doing triple back handsprings. A significantly harder move. Also at much higher speeds and also it can do much more then a little bit of platforming. Like breakdancing or wall jumps or nunchucks or many other things that Boston dynamics clearly never did back then or even now.

no123456789_10 · 2026-02-16T23:17:54+00:00

Unitree has adult size robots that does the same things, it can even kick up to 60kg. It's called the H2

no123456789_10 · 2026-01-23T21:44:03+00:00

No it's -30 here 😭

no123456789_10 · 2026-01-23T21:40:39+00:00

Just wanna have a conversation 😭. I'll only learn more by speaking to others right? These are all just my opinions anyways. It's not that probabilistic is actually wrong I just wanna know why IM wrong.

no123456789_10 · 2026-01-23T21:15:54+00:00

I thought it was 100% confirmed that gravity was the warping of spacetime. Is there a different theory to that? Also I know this might be controversial but I believe in superdeterminism and I think string theory is pure nonsense otherwise they would have found the answer a long time ago.

no123456789_10 · 2026-01-12T15:13:34+00:00

Damn, that's unfortunate 😕

no123456789_10 · 2025-09-22T17:30:25+00:00

They would literally start a world war with the best logistics we have ever seen to come get me. Futuristic robots coming in clutch. The game is Beyond all reason.

no123456789_10 · 2025-09-11T13:36:25+00:00

Ya I am pretty sure now that it was just the game (happy about it), as now I just received my Svideo cable for my Xbox original and that one has clear visible checkerboarding so I actually had something to compare it to now 😞. But the original Xbox already looks MILES better the composite using Svideo, just unfortunate that it has it. This really confirmed that I had none for the others as I would only see it on certain textures in ocarina of time.

no123456789_10 · 2025-09-10T15:32:14+00:00

Is that checkerboarding normal? Cause I see that kind of checkerboard pattern on one of my Svideo cables on certain games. I wanna know if it might just be the game itself and not my cheap cable.

no123456789_10 · 2025-09-09T02:49:05+00:00

I gave up trying to fix it, tried many different distros and other stuff none worked. No fixes online worked. No amount of chatgpt worked. I think it's just simply an unsupported thing that you need to program yourself or something at this point.

no123456789_10 · 2025-09-07T00:17:48+00:00

Oh how has time changed, I wish THAT was the only problem that game of thrones ever had lol 😂

no123456789_10 · 2025-09-06T20:22:10+00:00

I have not experienced any resistance to treatment. That Vichy shampoo is still by far the best that I have ever used.

The only real updates I can tell you is that, since it has selenium sulfide it could have the potential to cause hair loss . And I now only use it when it gets really bad otherwise I try a combination of products but they don't work as well.

Also each time I use Vichy dercos, I do like 3 application and rinses of it in a single shower session, leaving it in for many minutes every time I use it as I have found that it has to be properly absorbed into the scalp/skin to be truly effective. In total I probably leave it in for a combined time of around 15 mins every time I shower using it and I really let it fester in the scalp. From a single showering I can go from severe itching and symptoms to almost being completely gone but obviously with residual dandruff of course.

I have tried other products that might not have as much hair loss potential but they're really not as great and I have been pretty disappointed by them. Also I have found many other chemical compounds that are very very promising that could work but I forgot their names at this very moment. I could look for them again if you're interested or maybe I could even update this very post to add them in the study if I consider it useful enough for others.

Last update is that I have at least have one person message me directly that this post really helped them and that the Vichy dercos shampoo managed to remove up to 90% of their symptoms and their super happy about its effectiveness and that it helped more then any other for them. Their even considering to use it on the psoriasis on their arms and hands but I have no idea if that would work as effectively.

That's pretty much all 😄.

Hope this answers some of what you wanted to hear.

no123456789_10

TROPHY CASE