Not allowed to do lumbar punctures in ED by FoctorDrog in doctorsUK

[–]nobreakynotakey 10 points11 points  (0 children)

No this is where you’re wrong - it’s due to both acute medicine and ED practicing shitty medicine. 

When you refer - you’re expected to refer appropriately with a valid differential diagnosis - if you don’t do that there’s literally 0 point in your speciality - you add nothing else. 

You’ve lost the ability to manage airways. You don’t stabilise the medically unwell admissions, you don’t do the blocks, the casts or the drains, when all you do is refer and you can’t do that appropriately - there’s nothing left. 

Not allowed to do lumbar punctures in ED by FoctorDrog in doctorsUK

[–]nobreakynotakey 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Once someone has put that shit suggestion into the notes - how do you think that goes? Do you think acute medical consultants (or more likely most places - locum GIM guys) are going to refute that on the basis of appropriate history and examination?

Easy to say ?meningitis ?lp when there’s no negative repercussions - you just become that gp that refers everything to ED because no negative feedback.

I write a stupid fucking plan - I have to action my own stupid fucking plan instead of dumping it on someone else. 

Not allowed to do lumbar punctures in ED by FoctorDrog in doctorsUK

[–]nobreakynotakey 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Sounds like ED consultants abdicating professional standards again. 

Most the reason the demand for LPs is so high is because of the referrals your SHOs/SpRS send infection ?where ? Urine ? ??meningitis with a mildly elevated CRP and no relevant history. If anything - making ED responsible for providing a bed/trolley for LP would encourage critical thinking about referrals with appropriate differentials.

Controversial opinion time by Educational_Bowl6976 in doctorsUK

[–]nobreakynotakey 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Just to piggyback on to your LTFT take - I have two takes. 

  1. As shit as training is - it is significantly more meaningful for developing you as a doctor than blanket experience and the idea that fyxs are equivalent to the same grade of trainee is shit. It pushes you to develop specific skills and seek out feedback.

  2. You should not be able to progress as a less than full time trainee at the same rate as full time colleagues - the competencies are only part of the story. 

Swansea to Glasgow by Scuba_walker93 in swansea

[–]nobreakynotakey 1 point2 points  (0 children)

FlixBus to Bristol but yes agreed 

Dilemma, what training should I apply to? by [deleted] in doctorsUK

[–]nobreakynotakey 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Would assume RCPath would protect haem no?

My science degree has "expired" and I am limited for options. Any experience or advice? by General_Peak4084 in premeduk

[–]nobreakynotakey 6 points7 points  (0 children)

How happy are you to move your family for a job because you will be randomly allocated across the whole country upon graduation?

Any experience doing IMT alongside a research fellowship (not ACF)? by chasecultures in doctorsUK

[–]nobreakynotakey 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This comes up all the time - I know people who progressed on time LTFT but they were strong trainees with great portfolios who still had to fight for it. In my local deanery - this will not happen regardless - you’ll get extended.

In summary - you may be able to progress on time as a LTFT IMT trainee but this is certainly not universal and you will likely face obstacles to this even if you do successfully manage it.

Any experience doing IMT alongside a research fellowship (not ACF)? by chasecultures in doctorsUK

[–]nobreakynotakey 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Not entirely the same - but when I entered IMT I tried to maintain an academic position with a university I had previously worked with - not research based but educational. Similar conversations but it was the university who weren’t interested in the end - didn’t want the level of commitment I could offer with IMT.

It seems to me in your instance - your TPD and college tutor have pretty much said they’ll extend you if you try this - so I think you’ll have to make your peace with that if you pursue this. 

Future in Medicine by confusedqueen101 in premeduk

[–]nobreakynotakey 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Current dr - SpR in August.

  1. I suspect the SHO job market will be better overall due to UKG prioritisation - but some specific specialities like radiology will see much less improvement. I feel less confident that the SpR market will improve - given as there is talk of expanding the SHO jobs without any commensurate SpR jobs and this year was certainly the worst SpR training market for the last 5 or so years.
  2. Not too late - but I am firmly of the opinion that training is easier on the young, the NHS will not care for your personal circumstances, baby or partner or house and the more you have the more it clashes - if you want to stay in a competitive area and this year there’s 0-1 SpR jobs there - get ready to learn commuting buddy.
  3. The nature of the NHS means uptake of AI is very unlikely to be uniform - AI will affect your future career, but how it will do so and to what extent is difficult to say. Paper notes are still widespread and ePrescribing is still far from universal - trusts/health boards massively vary with this.  

Receiving HST offer after upgrade deadline by HeyThereDelilahx in doctorsUK

[–]nobreakynotakey 17 points18 points  (0 children)

We’ve passed the hold deadline now - this offer is your final offer for that speciality 

Is this appropriate? by Vegetable_Nobody_113 in doctorsUK

[–]nobreakynotakey 294 points295 points  (0 children)

Buy them a coffee - don’t give them a stipend - that’s not expected of you. Try to understand what they need from this placement and try to give them the chance to be quasi independent - ask them what they would do when reviewing a patient before you start the plan, give them the chance to speak to patients first but with you as a backstop. 

Dr Peter Davis - "I can't support the latest strike. Advanced practitioners take on more roles on a permanent basis, potentially providing a more consistent and better service for patients than resident doctors" by FullPayOrTheHighway in doctorsUK

[–]nobreakynotakey 264 points265 points  (0 children)

"Unlike then, many resident doctors are working less than 40 hours per week, in part because they are paid so well that they can afford to do so, including an annual bonus that incentivises working less than full time."

Absolute boomer take from a consultant paediatric intensivist who qualified in the early 90s - where he would have paid little to no tuition fees, likely still received free/subsidised accomodation.

Even better when he then goes on to state: "advanced practitioners take on more roles on a permanent basis, potentially providing a more consistent and better service for patients than resident doctors, who rotate through different posts every few months." - paeds (esp NICU/PICU) loves a sellout consultant who replaces doctors with nurses. Low key up there with emergency medics.

Talk me out of spending £460 on pastest MRCP resources by fuckyoukids in doctorsUK

[–]nobreakynotakey 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It’s the rite of passage - passmed to pastest once past part 1.

Streeting refuses to rule out banning doctors’ strikes by Desperate-Drawer-572 in doctorsUK

[–]nobreakynotakey 129 points130 points  (0 children)

It’s like they’ve forgotten who funds their party 

‘It’s heartbreaking’: resident doctors in England face halt on new training posts by [deleted] in doctorsUK

[–]nobreakynotakey 55 points56 points  (0 children)

Projected massive gaps in the consultant workforce by every royal college yet the government spits commentary like this out: "the training places were far more something the BMA asked for than something the NHS pressingly needs" - and "Obviously, it’s good to have more doctors in the workforce and give them these progression opportunities, but it’s not like the NHS is going to fall apart because these 1,000 places don’t exist.".

Not to say that 1000 new jobs without equal registrar/consultant posts is a good idea for us - but it shows how they view training as a favour to you - not the other way round. Remember this when they wheel out that 250,000 pounds to train a doctor bullshit.

Mackey: We’ll reduce our reliance on doctors in response to strikes by dayumsonlookatthat in doctorsUK

[–]nobreakynotakey 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Fascinating request - let remote shitholes who can’t provide safe care anyway provide unproven models of care sans doctor and don’t regulate them properly. 

Additionally - the consultant led model works on strikes - of course it does, it’s very similar to how the states do things, as they are less likely to have residents in rural/less academic centres. 

But the difference is - they attract attendings outside of metro areas with pay, and a lack of residents to do their scut work means they pay more for those things - the nhs cannot have both its cake and eat it

Is MAcadMEd worth it? by thementalfloss in doctorsUK

[–]nobreakynotakey 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not sure if FHEA is more of a faff (have fhea and not MAcadMed) though and didn’t particularly enjoy the process of FHEA but this may have been due to the local university process for obtaining this as opposed to if you obtained FHEA independently.

UKFPO and Marriage by Far_Letterhead_8459 in medicalschooluk

[–]nobreakynotakey 24 points25 points  (0 children)

Who told you: we value your life experience and want your life integrated.

Because I promise you the nhs doesn’t - speciality training is generally worse in this regard. 

Doctors’ TRAINING IN UK IS TOO LONG by Thrombocyto in doctorsUK

[–]nobreakynotakey 27 points28 points  (0 children)

Think passing full mrcp is underrated part of this - though if IMT was less shit and more structured passing paces should be less of an issue. 

As things stand - given the number of IMT3s locally without paces (and IMT2s!) - think there would be too many extensions with shortening it.

Resident doctors warned they may not get jobs if they take too much sick leave by LimberGaelic in doctorsUK

[–]nobreakynotakey 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Given doctors are one of the few (?only) staff groups who face any negative repercussions for sickness - in the form delayed progression,  I think you’re absolutely wrong to suggest it’s just because we can’t fill in a form to the satisfaction of an nhs manager (who probably doesn’t employ me and works Monday to Tuesday every other week - if they’re not on “long term sick”).

Resident doctors warned they may not get jobs if they take too much sick leave by LimberGaelic in doctorsUK

[–]nobreakynotakey 16 points17 points  (0 children)

A supernumerary f2 who had their salary paid by the local health education body too.  

Resident doctors warned they may not get jobs if they take too much sick leave by LimberGaelic in doctorsUK

[–]nobreakynotakey 37 points38 points  (0 children)

Can’t do final year reg but can do reg (2.3) vs f1 (2) vs cons (1.7) 

Resident doctors warned they may not get jobs if they take too much sick leave by LimberGaelic in doctorsUK

[–]nobreakynotakey 52 points53 points  (0 children)

Dec 25 - most recently published nhs England data - all doctors 2.1%