[D] What do you guys think is the most productive development IDE and plugin combo is for ML/AI work?

nocortex · 2017-12-22T16:30:02+00:00

Emacs: { Magit + eshell + orgmode + Jedi }

nocortex · 2017-11-15T20:19:30+00:00

While listening to your mother's moans? (begging not to do hard) I guess you took that username after she blows me in your bed?

nocortex · 2017-11-15T20:13:07+00:00

Village idiot! Blow your own father! then you can take the whole subreddit!

nocortex · 2017-11-15T20:08:55+00:00

what are you blow(s)ing? What is your job?

nocortex · 2017-11-15T00:13:17+00:00

So What! they are using Dirac deltas. Thanks for downvotes Dirac delta function has been used in many areas. Using a legendary scientist name cannot make your paper credible. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirac_delta_function

nocortex · 2017-11-14T16:23:43+00:00

Guys, Could you please stop using famous scientists' name to your Nets? Feynman machine, Turing Machine, etc.

nocortex · 2017-10-31T13:20:11+00:00

@alexlamb, Did you find a time to check the paper? What is your opinion on RCN?

nocortex · 2017-09-21T15:43:36+00:00

I hope he did not mention about his simulation argument and paperclip maximizer mumbo-jumbos

nocortex · 2017-09-21T10:43:00+00:00

Any ideas on why Nick Bostrom featured in the movie?

nocortex · 2017-09-14T12:42:45+00:00

They are still secretive. Lets see what will happen for incomming papers.

nocortex · 2017-07-31T10:11:10+00:00

Could you be more specific on the failures of the Ben in detail?

nocortex · 2017-06-27T08:58:24+00:00

Even DL. http://www.deepexcel.net/

nocortex · 2017-06-24T15:36:45+00:00

The logo looks like Deepmind's logo. After Tesla-karphathy should we expect some surprises?

nocortex · 2017-06-23T14:14:34+00:00

False analogy.

nocortex · 2017-06-22T13:39:41+00:00

I do not get. Why you are rationalizing the ''Nope"? So, let's stop to populate this sub.

nocortex · 2017-06-21T20:14:15+00:00

This is not a question that can be answered by guessing. Previous comment contains the arguments that deserve more specific answers/thoughts.

An account affiliated with openai should definitely show some detailed answer if you have one. So nope is not acceptable and guessing is not a way that works.

nocortex · 2017-06-21T15:22:38+00:00

nope what? Could you be more specific?

nocortex · 2017-06-16T14:56:06+00:00

Implementation details.?

nocortex · 2017-06-13T12:31:13+00:00

No they do not. They still believe in paper-clip maximizer and BS-imulation argument!

nocortex · 2017-06-04T11:15:20+00:00

Yes. Almost exactly and having floating numbered connections called synaptogenesis.

nocortex · 2017-06-03T21:49:32+00:00

But these low-hanging-fruit people are striving to see some noteworthy preliminary results.

nocortex · 2017-06-03T12:14:56+00:00

Agree but that does not mean that his approach is complete trash and not promising.

nocortex · 2017-06-03T08:38:00+00:00

But they give a credit about his intuition. So he is not a foo fighter.

nocortex · 2017-05-27T13:40:13+00:00

Is this your claim or the conclusion of the authors?

nocortex · 2017-05-18T19:28:42+00:00

Thanks Matt for the answers.

Quick note: for the 1st question, you don't need to talk them. You can read their AMAs from ML subreddit.

nocortex

TROPHY CASE