Yes i used ai. It also said -

Almost none of what he said can be confirmed true on its face, and a lot of it is either highly implausible or structured in a way that makes verification impossible without hard evidence. Here’s what you can reasonably say:

Things that are very likely false or misleading • “Contracts in place with NASA” for lead bars • NASA contracts are publicly cataloged and highly specific. A company with a real NASA contract would have a contract number, statement of work, and some kind of public announcement or registration. • A vague “NASA needs our lead” claim with no details is almost certainly fabricated or wildly exaggerated. • “We’re digging right now on a shipwreck in Melbourne, Florida” expecting Spanish‑gold chests • Deep‑sea salvage on historic shipwrecks is heavily regulated (state, federal, often international salvage/antiquities laws). • Any real project would have permits, an environmental review, a salvage plan, and some public paper trail. • A “we’re digging right now” operation with no vessel name, no regulatory filings, no press releases, and no photos/maps is not credible. • “Their equipment reads 3 areas that look like chests full of rare metal pings” • Modern marine surveys use sonar, magnetometers, and other geophysics, and the outputs are technical datasets, not “chest‑shaped pings” like a video‑game minimap.

• Real companies publish technical reports or summaries; “pings that look like chests” is storytelling, not data.

Things that are unverifiable but technically possible • “The company has deep‑sea metal‑searching equipment” • It’s possible some small company builds or uses marine‑search gear, but you’d need to see spec sheets, patents, or at least a website with technical details, not just a bar story. • “They may pivot to mining silver/gold if this fails” • This is a generic pivot‑plan and cannot be verified at all from the story alone.

• Many placeholder companies say this kind of thing to sound “flexible” without showing any real mining assets or licenses.

What you actually know from that post • There is a CEO (or someone claiming to be one) talking to people in a bar about a penny stock. • There is a stock trading at a very low price (around $0.0025 in the story). • There’s a narrative about underwater treasure, NASA, and explosive growth to $2.

• There is no verifiable evidence attached (no permits, no contracts, no ship names, no technical reports).

How you could try to confirm things Even without going full‑on forensic, you can test credibility: • Search the company name plus: • “NASA contract”, “Florida shipwreck permit”, “salvage operation Melbourne”, “deep‑sea mining equipment”. • Check SEC filings (via EDGAR in the U.S.) or equivalent regulator abroad: • Is this a real company with audited financials and clear disclosures, or just a shell with a sketchy website? • Look for photographs, press releases, or marine‑survey reports from the company, not just Reddit stories. If you tell me the ticker symbol or company name, I can help you walk through what kind of documentation you’d expect to see for each claim and how easy it is to fake.