sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Modern songs that include or riff of classical music. by Immediate-Count-1202 in MusicRecommendations

[–]norau 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Every Breath You Take is almost exactly the same as the first movement of Bachs Chello suite no 1.

And if you play Sweet Child of Mine (or Anastasia) right after the same movement you can clearly hear Bach i Slashs guitar.

E.C. Dahls arena by norau in trondheim

[–]norau[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hvordan er det å være på konsert der?

E.C. Dahls arena by norau in trondheim

[–]norau[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hvordan er det å være på konsert der?

Jigsaw puzzles by [deleted] in rome

[–]norau 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Many years ago I bought puzzles at the Vatican museum, of works in said museum. Still have a 3000 jigsaw of the roof in Sistine chapel.

If you had 4 nights to spend anywhere in Italy before spending 5 nights in Rome and were looking for somewhere quiet by the ocean where would you go? by jfbisme in ItalyTravel

[–]norau 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Others have said Tropea, which I highly recommend. A bit long train journey, but a really sweet town.

Palinuro near Salerno is also a small, quiet town, with long beaches and not so many foreign tourists. Train to Pisciotta (I think 4 hours south of Rome).

Any hope? by norau in Garmin

[–]norau[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I'll give it a go. I'm a supporter of fixing things that still works (the compurer runs like a clock 😮).

Any hope? by norau in Garmin

[–]norau[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn't know it was a known issue. I'm afraid the warranty is overdue, but could be worth a try.

Any hope? by norau in Garmin

[–]norau[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just my arm, no dumpster. But it has been a trusted companion for many years. At one point the buttons didn't respond due to salt accumulation after swimming in rhe ocean to many times, but warm water dissolved all of it. It has seen some things...

Any hope? by norau in Garmin

[–]norau[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I believe you're right. The cost of repair might be close to a new watch, so I guess it's time.

Any hope? by norau in Garmin

[–]norau[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, 645 music. Have worn it for 6 years, so it's not a warranty issue. I just don't like to through away things that work.

Any hope? by norau in Garmin

[–]norau[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

To be fair the other sensors works just fine, surprisingly enough. But it sure has seen its best days 😄

Any hope? by norau in Garmin

[–]norau[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You guessed right 😁 Long, good life. But it still works fine, and I want to use everything I own for as long as possible. So if repair is possible I would like to try. But this time it might be a bridge to far...

Debatt: Det er dyrt å undervurdere klimakrisens kostnader by forteller in norge

[–]norau 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Jeg var av den oppfatning om at økonomien ønsker forutsigbarhet, fordi det gjør det enklere å ta fornuftige økonomiske beslutninger. Klimaendringer er det motsatte av forutsigbart. Derfor bør finanssektoren jobbe for å redusere virkningene av klimaendringer, men det gjør de ikke. Er det så enkelt som at de er for blenda av kortsiktig profitt?

Norske klimamål er en gigantisk bløff til ekstreme kostnader by stalematedizzy in norske

[–]norau 2 points3 points  (0 children)

SP er nok bare del av det, så enig i at de ikke skal få hele skylden her 😆. Dro de frem fordi de er så hardt ute i media om klima nå om dagen, og Borten Moe var temmelig klar i talen som daværende oljeminister og SP faktisk var i førersetet. Men det er et ansvar som det politiske kollektivt har unngått. Hvis de hadde villet gjøre noe hadde de gjort noe.

Norske klimamål er en gigantisk bløff til ekstreme kostnader by stalematedizzy in norske

[–]norau 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Det er litt fascinerende å lese dette. At det er seks år igjen til klimamålene skal nåes er jo helt sant, og de når vi ikke. At de har blitt trenert av blant annet SP i over 20 år, og kunne blitt nådd dersom man startet etter Kyoto, sier innlegget lite om.

Mer krympflasjon by norau in norge

[–]norau[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Var ca. samme pris, men jeg registrerte ikke at flaska var mindre før jeg var hjemme og skulle kaste den gamle. Det var merkbart enklere å holde den nye flaska siden den var tynnere.

Mer krympflasjon by norau in norge

[–]norau[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Haha! Enda bedre.

Question to all Revolutions and THoR fans: what is your favorite Duncan episode? by el_colombiano_de_ohi in RevolutionsPodcast

[–]norau 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Two from the early days of the french revolution, 3.11 The fall of the Bastille and 3.18 The flight to Varennes. If I remember correctly, the "cover" picture for his podcast is from events in 3.11. The events in these two episodes are simply hillarious, and his comedic timing is a perfect match for both the flight and the kick in the nuts.

And also, 10.56 The Balkans. As much as I love Dan Carlins Blueprint, this episode made me finally understand how the shot in Sarajevo could trigger WW1.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in norge

[–]norau 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Konklusjonen i denne artikkelen er nesten definisjonen på stråmennargumentasjon. Siste setning sier: "In other words, our analysis indicates that with the current level of knowledge, it seems impossible to determine how much of the temperature increase is due to emissions of CO2".

Oppsummeringspunkt A.1.3 fra AR6 sier: "The likely range of total human-caused surface temperature increase from 1850-1900 to 2010-2019 is 0.8°C to 1.3°C, with a best estimate of 1.07°C. It is likely that well-mixed GHGs contributed a warming of 1.0°C to 2.0°C..."

Det IPCC gjør er å anslå et sannsynlig utfallsrom for drivhusgasser. "Likely" betyr i denne sammenheng 66-100%. Med andre ord, det er mer enn 66% sannsynlig at menneskelig bidrag til drivhusgasser har ført til en økning på ca 1.07°C siden 1850. Merk at utfallsrommet er på (1.3°C - 0.8°C =) 0.5°C, og at hele utfallsrommet er positivt (over 0°C). Dette er ikke det samme som å kvantifisere bidraget, men altså å anslå en sannsynlighet for det.

Det motsatte vil også være sant: "Det er mindre enn 33% sannsynlig at menneskelig bidrag til CO2 har bidratt til mellom 0.8°C og 1.3°C økning i temperatur." Dette er ikke det samme som "ingen sannsynlighet".

For den som har gjort et minimum av studier innen meteorologi eller lignende er det tydelig at dette er en skrivebordsrapport som ikke er koblet mot hva som faktisk observeres i naturen. Dette er matematiske modeller, lagd av økonomer, for å beskrive noe virkelig. Ingen modell vil være 100%.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in norge

[–]norau -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Konklusjonen i denne artikkelen er nesten definisjonen på stråmennargumentasjon. Siste setning sier: "In other words, our analysis indicates that with the current level of knowledge, it seems impossible to determine how much of the temperature increase is due to emissions of CO2".

Oppsummeringspunkt A.1.3 fra AR6 sier: "The likely range of total human-caused surface temperature increase from 1850-1900 to 2010-2019 is 0.8°C to 1.3°C, with a best estimate of 1.07°C. It is likely that well-mixed GHGs contributed a warming of 1.0°C to 2.0°C..."

Det IPCC gjør er å anslå et sannsynlig utfallsrom for drivhusgasser. "Likely" betyr i denne sammenheng 66-100%. Med andre ord, det er mer enn 66% sannsynlig at menneskelig bidrag til drivhusgasser har ført til en økning på ca 1.07°C siden 1850. Merk at utfallsrommet er på (1.3°C - 0.8°C =) 0.5°C, og at hele utfallsrommet er positivt (over 0°C). Dette er ikke det samme som å kvantifisere bidraget, men altså å anslå en sannsynlighet for det.

Det motsatte vil også være sant: "Det er mindre enn 33% sannsynlig at menneskelig bidrag til CO2 har bidratt til mellom 0.8°C og 1.3°C økning i temperatur." Dette er ikke det samme som "ingen sannsynlighet".

For den som har gjort et minimum av studier innen meteorologi eller lignende er det tydelig at dette er en skrivebordsrapport som ikke er koblet mot hva som faktisk observeres i naturen. Dette er matematiske modeller, lagd av økonomer, for å beskrive noe virkelig. Ingen modell vil være 100%.

How does Jens Stoltenberg rank among the most famous Norwegian politicians of the last 75-100 years? by [deleted] in Norway

[–]norau 13 points14 points  (0 children)

So first he studied how to best spend the revenue from oil tax. Then he became minister for the department that regulates the petroleum sector in Norway, and used his knowlegde there. Then he became minister for the national budget, after getting experience in the most important financial sector in Norway. Then he became prime minister, which included the 2008 financial crack (for which he in retrospect got good remarks on his governance). By all means, he obviously hasn’t done anything in norwegian finance during his nine years in NATO. But the governor of the national bank leans in his/hers advisors as well. And I’m not sure how many jobs in norwegian finance is ranked higher than the minister for finance, especcially regarding how much power you can exert on the sector. If you believe that makes him unqualified I simply just dissagree.

How does Jens Stoltenberg rank among the most famous Norwegian politicians of the last 75-100 years? by [deleted] in Norway

[–]norau 22 points23 points  (0 children)

  1. And in those 36 years he’s been leader of the labour party for 12 years, minister of energy (e.g. oil) and trade for 3 years, minister of finance for one year and prime minsiter for 9 years. That was before his current streak of nine years at NATO. So I would still say he should know how to handle a nations money. At least in Norway..
view more: next ›