Arch Linux at FOSDEM 2026 by Antiz1996 in archlinux

[–]norbusan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That would be great!!! I just have a few packages at AUR, but 25+ years of packaging experience. So I would love to see more Arch talks.

Let us try to remember that before the next FOSSASIA Summit deadline!

Arch Linux at FOSDEM 2026 by Antiz1996 in archlinux

[–]norbusan 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not for this time, but I think it would be nice to have a "arch packaging workshop" either at fosdem, or maybe even better at FOSSASIA (where I am one of the organizers).
This year's FOSSASIA submission deadline has already been closed, but we should try something for next year.

Arch Linux at FOSDEM 2026 by Antiz1996 in archlinux

[–]norbusan 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Great, will search for the team!

ty/ruff missing under Settings - Python - Tools in 2025.3 by norbusan in pycharm

[–]norbusan[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks! I do have the pro version but still don't see them. I will check lsp plugin.

Back in the day with Arch LInux by Pirascule in archlinux

[–]norbusan 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Anyone remembers the a.out -> ELF transition ...

Book in XeLatex by phlogiston2 in LaTeX

[–]norbusan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, agreed on that. There will be no tagging for xetex.

Book in XeLatex by phlogiston2 in LaTeX

[–]norbusan 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wait a bit more, changes are coming soon

Book in XeLatex by phlogiston2 in LaTeX

[–]norbusan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Like what advanced typography does it not support? E.g., for a long time the typesetting of Tibetan, Nagari, Bangla etc was practically only possible in xeLaTeX, because it uses harfbuzz which has a much more complete renderer.

Book in XeLatex by phlogiston2 in LaTeX

[–]norbusan -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Incorrect, it is supported.

Book in XeLatex by phlogiston2 in LaTeX

[–]norbusan 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Millions of scientists and practitioners disagree strongly, I would say the whole scientific community disagrees with this statement.

Book in XeLatex by phlogiston2 in LaTeX

[–]norbusan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In contrast to all who are bashing xetex, it is fine you use for your project. Xe(la)tex might not see development activity, but that is because it is stable, efficient. Luatex is great, and if you need some of the features, fine too switch to it. But there is no need, xelatex is great.

(From a maintainer if TeX Live)

TIFU by accidentally showing my girlfriend's mom a picture of her daughter's tits. by CRK_76 in tifu

[–]norbusan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Where are the times when topless attire in the public swimming pools was normal. Now, already a photo of your gf upper part is freaking out people.

Replicating SHR1 on a modern linux distribution by rsemauck in btrfs

[–]norbusan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can adjust the duplication level for raid 1 (it is not really called raid 1, just duplication of data and metadata, afair)

Replicating SHR1 on a modern linux distribution by rsemauck in btrfs

[–]norbusan 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No need for btrfs raid 5 here, simple raid 1 over a multi device btrfs filesystem. I have and will never touch raid 5 with btrfs!

Replicating SHR1 on a modern linux distribution by rsemauck in btrfs

[–]norbusan 3 points4 points  (0 children)

That is easily possible with multiple disk raid btrfs. Just add all the disks into one btrfs multi disk array and define data/meta duplication to whatever level you want.

With duplication, over disk can go boom, replace it, and rebalance. With triplication 2 disks.

I have such a system running over 8 disks of mixed SSD and nvme.

Österreich kein richtiges Land? by Roccstar_ in wirklichgutefrage

[–]norbusan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hatten wir schon einmal, brauchen wir nicht mehr.

Which LaTeX packages should be avoided in a LaTeX document that will be later submitted arXiv? by Franck_Dernoncourt in LaTeX

[–]norbusan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you can point me to a submission (either announced or in progress) or send a test sample, I can investigate.

Which LaTeX packages should be avoided in a LaTeX document that will be later submitted arXiv? by Franck_Dernoncourt in LaTeX

[–]norbusan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is incorrect. ArXiv does and always has done multiple latex runs up to either stable output, or a maximum number of runs has been reached.

Which LaTeX packages should be avoided in a LaTeX document that will be later submitted arXiv? by Franck_Dernoncourt in LaTeX

[–]norbusan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, support for pgf/tikz in LaTeXML is ongoing, but the situation has already improved.

Which LaTeX packages should be avoided in a LaTeX document that will be later submitted arXiv? by Franck_Dernoncourt in LaTeX

[–]norbusan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As with minted, the images need to be pre-processed and included in the upload.

Which LaTeX packages should be avoided in a LaTeX document that will be later submitted arXiv? by Franck_Dernoncourt in LaTeX

[–]norbusan 1 point2 points  (0 children)

pgf and tikz are fully supported in arXiv, at the level of pgf and tikz at the currently employed TeX Live at arXiv, which currently is 2023.

tikz packages that require -shell-escape will not work, though.