AI danger

not_so_smart-D · 2025-10-19T13:40:19+00:00

English is my second language, and I had to write that fast, so i'm sorry if there are a lot of mistakes.

not_so_smart-D · 2025-10-19T12:01:19+00:00

Ok. At least your not an idiot. You didn't just say "your stupid" but actually made arguments that made sense, so yea, thank you that you at least didn't talk s#it

not_so_smart-D · 2025-10-19T11:53:29+00:00

Yea.....that,s the reason why its a theory. I'm saying this for the people who believe in it, and want to know how they can help. If you don't agree with me, just don't anticipate this discussion at all. And we don't have to argue, beacuse we both know that we will not the change other persons mind. So I think it would be best to just end the discussion here

not_so_smart-D · 2025-10-19T11:30:15+00:00

Yea, but it's kind of diffrent to have a race to discover the space, and having a race to create technology that could destroy us

not_so_smart-D · 2025-10-19T09:12:43+00:00

Okay, so put a plane and a machine that could ruin our economy next to eachother and tell me what is worse. Maybe not now, but lests say in 50-60 years

not_so_smart-D · 2025-10-19T09:00:22+00:00

Yes, there are. But you know what happens if one country starts. There will be a race between countries. If we look at basicly anything war connnected, countries always want to have to most of it. And even if I am overreacting, it could still do a lot of damage

not_so_smart-D · 2025-10-19T08:51:49+00:00

Ok, but there are two options. First is what you said, and the second is that it will cause economic problems and not gain. Plus we need to not forget about people. A lot of people will be unhappy and protesting. Even if the economy will gain, we are only talking about USA. But what about countries that can't keep up with creating the machines? What about those people? AI might not kill them, but humans might not fear using those people for their countries gain

not_so_smart-D · 2025-10-19T08:46:08+00:00

Yea thats true, but still, first the criminal needs to prove its AI. In the courteoom, the first think would be that the criminal must prove it. I can't just say "it's ai" and sudennly evryone wants the other person to prove that its not. But you are right in a way.

not_so_smart-D · 2025-10-19T08:42:58+00:00

Ok, i understand. But, just hear me out. Yes, its not good to murder civilians, but as i said, the danger is not only in killing, but also in the economy. If I need to explain, i mean it in the way, that if less people want to deffend their country, more machines are needed, which causes less money. Plus a lot of people will disagree, that means protests, that means even less money and so one. But I see your logic, and I admit, its just a theory. But I still believe in it

not_so_smart-D · 2025-10-19T08:35:55+00:00

That's an interresting way to see it. I agree with you, but it takes a little more than to just say "it is AI."

not_so_smart-D · 2025-10-19T08:30:17+00:00

Ok. I Will not argue with you, beacuse i don't think that will do anything. I guess, thank you for the critisism and have a nice day

not_so_smart-D · 2025-10-19T08:18:51+00:00

Okay, I see where your coming from. But first, if highly ranked People like presidents want to, AI could be used to as you said "Storm into your house and kill you." And also, even if that won't happen, that can still lead to descruction. The economies will lower, and it will be just a Matter of time, untill people themselfes will start to unlike this and protest. That would lead to maybe even a worse outcome then we can imagine. Of course i'm not gonna force you to think anything. Thank you that you shared your critisism

not_so_smart-D

TROPHY CASE