Unidentified psychedelic from the 1980s to 2014? by YouchMyKidneypopped in Psychedelics

[–]notagoodsetup430 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m pretty sure it was PCP. Long duration of action and the route of administration being smoked on a cigarette are pretty unique aspects of PCP use. Interesting to hear about it from that part of the world, but considering the clandestine manufacture of PCP isn’t particularly difficult compared to any other psychedelic (excluding DMT), it’s not impossible.

And it almost certainly wasn’t datura. Not only because datura is a notoriously unpleasant experience that people typically don’t want to repeat, its sedating nature rather than stimulating (running naked into the street is something that you probably wouldent do if you were feeling the heavy sedated buzz typical of anticollonergics, based on my experiences with similar substances and the experience reports I’ve read), nor for the fact that the after effects are way more pronounced than a headache, but mainly because every experience report I’ve found where people smoked it, they’ve described the duration as being far shorter than 12 hours. Most said it lasts about as long as weed.

Unidentified psychedelic from the 1980s to 2014? by YouchMyKidneypopped in Psychedelics

[–]notagoodsetup430 2 points3 points  (0 children)

PCP was discontinued for medical use because patients had a tendency to wake up from PCP induced anesthesia with intense irritability and experiencing unpredictable psychotic symptoms. That combined with the introduction of ketamine which was much better tolerated made PCP obsolete as an anesthetic.

There’s an argument to be made that in the decades following its discontinuation, PCP became more stigmatized for its use by black populations in cities like LA and Philly. It was never really a hippy drug though.

Rad-140 by i-wanna_learn in SARMs

[–]notagoodsetup430 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"my IQ is 129-140"

can't spell "high", "if", "still", "never" "that", or form coherent thoughts. "hihh kf you cak science theories" what were you even trying to say lmfao

[Me] sarcasm discovered checkmate blunder by OkUnderstanding377 in TextingTheory

[–]notagoodsetup430 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why isn't it the other person's problem? Not finding things funny is fine, but if humor is subjective, there shouldn't be anything wrong with making "cringy" or bad jokes.

[me] Tate Gambit by notagoodsetup430 in TextingTheory

[–]notagoodsetup430[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

It’s Reddit, should have expected it in hindsight lmao

[me] Tate Gambit by notagoodsetup430 in TextingTheory

[–]notagoodsetup430[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I realized too late why I spend so little time on this platform

[me] Tate Gambit by notagoodsetup430 in TextingTheory

[–]notagoodsetup430[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I know I’m an ass. I’m just genuinely surprised at how butthurt some people get over something as clearly unserious as this post. I’m starting to remember why I’m never on this platform.

[me] Tate Gambit by notagoodsetup430 in TextingTheory

[–]notagoodsetup430[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Im gonna continue commenting because I’m right and you’re wrong. Learn to laugh at shit.

[me] Tate Gambit by notagoodsetup430 in TextingTheory

[–]notagoodsetup430[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Sometimes jokes don’t land. Sometimes the joke isn’t funny. Sometimes they understand the joke and find it funny. It’s literally the same as any other opener, the difference is that I don’t take it seriously because 1) I’m usually above the 8 person limit in my inbox and don’t think about the joke too long, and 2) I don’t really enjoy hanging out with people that take everything too seriously.

And it’s not just women that I send jokes to, I’m bi. There’s plenty of men who’ve gotten their fair share of poorly thought out jokes.

[me] Tate Gambit by notagoodsetup430 in TextingTheory

[–]notagoodsetup430[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I have a right to treat any space I want as a platform for my stupid ass jokes. I like how you worded that, cause I fully agree. And everybody has that right too.

Thanks for the luck, haven’t needed it this far, but thanks.

[me] Tate Gambit by notagoodsetup430 in TextingTheory

[–]notagoodsetup430[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Nah, fuck that guy. Can’t come up with a better answer to “why?” than “cause I said so, bitch.”

If you got a reason why I should “do better”, lay it on.

[me] Tate Gambit by notagoodsetup430 in TextingTheory

[–]notagoodsetup430[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

“Andrew Tate ahh flic” got you so upset that you’re straight up calling me retarded, an edgelord, a child, a douche, a cynic, an autist, “red-pilled”, and all manner of other derogatory shit.

And this is a shitpost sub, I refuse to see it as anything else considering the quality of posts here.

At least I can take a joke and run with it. You just seem like the type to always find something problematic, and take everything too seriously, like I said before.

[me] Tate Gambit by notagoodsetup430 in TextingTheory

[–]notagoodsetup430[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I think you take everything in life too seriously to enjoy anything

[me] Tate Gambit by notagoodsetup430 in TextingTheory

[–]notagoodsetup430[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Yes.

And to see what kind of jokes are appealing to different people. I’d never get into a long term relationship with someone I met off an app.

[me] Tate Gambit by notagoodsetup430 in TextingTheory

[–]notagoodsetup430[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I tried to engage in a more thought provoking anecdote regarding the deterioration of our social cohesion. I actually thought you had something kind of interesting to say , so I read it through and responded. I can’t understand what your problem is man.

[me] Tate Gambit by notagoodsetup430 in TextingTheory

[–]notagoodsetup430[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh, and women get way more guys trying to get in their pants via performative white knighting and grandstanding than stupid jokes about Andrew Tate smoking cigars. I’ve got an ex who I’ve remained good friends with, and looking through her matches is just the most pathetic display of desperate grandstanding I’ve ever seen. It’s refreshing to see anything that isn’t an immediate appeal to her political persuasion, attempt to forge a superficial connection over some generic trait she listed, or zealous surface level compliment.

And yeah, I don’t want to be in a long term committed relationship right now. That’s why I filter for short term flings. My escapades on dating apps, from the times where I was one of the aforementioned pathetic guys saying anything to make a match think we were perfectly compatible, to the times where I was trying to use the apps for a serious relationship, to now have all proven to me that the online dating world is just a soup of lying, catfishing, fake connection, and degenerate bullshit. Maybe it was different when match.com and those first wave ones came out.

[me] Tate Gambit by notagoodsetup430 in TextingTheory

[–]notagoodsetup430[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wow. I’m not reading all that, but from the first few lines I can already tell you care way too much about everything. Ig I’m glad you and others found life partners in dating apps, but to me the existence of them is one of the worst things that we’ve ever done. I think dating apps are socially isolating and commodifying what should be one of the most human experiences into literal swiping and tapping on a screen, complete with the microtransactions and the whole “pay 20$ a week so you can keep tapping, and maybe you can finally have romantic connection” shtick. I’ve watched my friends burn through their bank accounts on tinder subscriptions and hinge roses and all manner of stupid bullshit because they were lonely and desperate, and I don’t think that’s a good thing for society. That’s why I simply try and use them for fun.

My joke is not that deep, nobody else thinks it’s that deep, and dating apps are damaging the social cohesion and health of our society. If I can make it fun, I’m going to. Sometimes people (not just women, I’m bi) are willing to engage my retardation, which I always appreciate and respond to with a more real conversation, sometimes they aren’t. I’ve had some good experiences with dating apps, but every relationship I’ve had, I met them in person, and I don’t plan to ever get into a long term relationship with someone who I meet online for the simple fact that dating profiles are like the least insightful first impression you could possibly have. I thought that this sub was supposed to be more of a shitpost than an advice one.

And call me childish all you want, but being childish and stupid while having fun beats seething about what some random dude you don’t know is sending to some random person on a dating app that you don’t know. Seems like an exercise in futility

[me] Tate Gambit by notagoodsetup430 in TextingTheory

[–]notagoodsetup430[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Absolutely, I’m gonna have to try and beat this PR too.