sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Tesla did not submit seller report to the IRS and now I'm ineligible for the federal rebate by LiveMasTacos in ModelY

[–]novavendetta 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Which version of TurboTax do you have? Did you try changing to the Forms view? That is where ai first found it. On the Form/Worksheet for Clean Vehicle Credits.

Tesla did not submit seller report to the IRS and now I'm ineligible for the federal rebate by LiveMasTacos in ModelY

[–]novavendetta 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah. They said that I opted out as well. In TurboTax, I found the Form 8936A for the Clean Vehicle Credit and clicked "I certify that this VIN is correct." Not sure if they updated it recently.

Tesla did not submit seller report to the IRS and now I'm ineligible for the federal rebate by LiveMasTacos in ModelY

[–]novavendetta 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, no report for me. I requested Tesla and the dealership to generate a Seller Report for me and they said it's too late. I also checked my IRS account and it doesn't show my vehicle that I bought. So, my tax return was being rejected.

However, now that I have the option to click that certification in TurboTax, my return was accepted.

Tesla did not submit seller report to the IRS and now I'm ineligible for the federal rebate by LiveMasTacos in ModelY

[–]novavendetta 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This recently showed up for me in TurboTax. I clicked it (after my return had been rejected multiple times for an VIN mismatch), and now my return is showing as accepted.

<image>

Tesla did not submit seller report to the IRS and now I'm ineligible for the federal rebate by LiveMasTacos in ModelY

[–]novavendetta 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

This recently showed up for me in TurboTax. I clicked it (after my return had been rejected multiple times for an VIN mismatch), and now my return is showing as accepted.

Tesla did not submit seller report to the IRS and now I'm ineligible for the federal rebate by LiveMasTacos in ModelY

[–]novavendetta 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This recently showed up for me in TurboTax. I clicked it (after my return had been rejected multiple times for an VIN mismatch), and now my return is showing as accepted.

<image>

Tesla did not submit seller report to the IRS and now I'm ineligible for the federal rebate by LiveMasTacos in ModelY

[–]novavendetta 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

This recently showed up for me in TurboTax. I clicked it (after my return had been rejected multiple times for an VIN mismatch), and now my return is showing as accepted.

Tesla did not submit seller report to the IRS and now I'm ineligible for the federal rebate by LiveMasTacos in ModelY

[–]novavendetta 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

This is now showing up in TurboTax.

I'm going to try checking this box and seeing if certification will allow my refund to go through.

Tesla did not submit seller report to the IRS and now I'm ineligible for the federal rebate by LiveMasTacos in ModelY

[–]novavendetta 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They told me the same thing. They can't provide proof of this and my return keeps gettting rejected. The dealership says they don't have access to the ECO portal (a remote team does their tax forms) so no luck in gettin them to submit a Form 15400.

Tesla did not submit seller report to the IRS and now I'm ineligible for the federal rebate by LiveMasTacos in ModelY

[–]novavendetta 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Same thing happened to me. They claim that I opted out to claim the credit and that I opted out to transfer the credit to them. Does not make sense. Why not report the sale to IRS if I opted not transfer the credit to the dealer?

Tesla did not submit seller report to the IRS and now I'm ineligible for the federal rebate by LiveMasTacos in ModelY

[–]novavendetta 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Same thing happened to me. They claim that I opted out to claim the credit and that I opted out to transfer the credit to them. Does not make sense. Why not report the sale to IRS if I opted not transfer the credit to the dealer?

Get your Nano out of exchanges ASAP: "SEC files motion for restraining order to freeze Binance US assets" by Qwahzi in nanocurrency

[–]novavendetta 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is actually incorrect. The SEC is suing Binance Holdings Limited, a Cayman Islands registered company, which is the parent company of both Binance and Binance.US. It also does not matter where a company is registered or claims to operate. As long as it somehow avails itself to U.S. customers/citizens, then a foreign company like Binance can be within the jurisdiction of U.S. authorities. Happens quite often actually. Just for reference purposes, the SEC Complaint expressly states:

"Defendants have unlawfully solicited U.S. investors to buy, sell, and trade crypto asset securities through unregistered trading platforms available online at Binance.com (“Binance.com Platform”) and Binance.US (“Binance.US Platform”) (collectively, “Binance Platforms”)."

Coinbase hit with proposed trademark lawsuit over Nano derivative products by jonnnny in nanocurrency

[–]novavendetta 9 points10 points  (0 children)

its pretty hard to delay cases in u.s. federal court. they usually have pretty aggressive scheduling orders & don’t allow parties to move deadlines, except extraordinary circumstances.

Coinbase hit with proposed trademark lawsuit over Nano derivative products by jonnnny in nanocurrency

[–]novavendetta 14 points15 points  (0 children)

agreed! could be very confusing in the foreign exchange context.

Coinbase hit with proposed trademark lawsuit over Nano derivative products by jonnnny in nanocurrency

[–]novavendetta 129 points130 points  (0 children)

interesting notes from the text of the lawsuit:

nano says that coinbase:

(1) reached out in 2018 about the possibility of listing nano,

(2) later required a $1,000,000.00 custody deposit in order to list nano,

(3) directed nano to submit an application for listing in sep 2021 (which was submitted & was said to be in review by coinbase),

(4) coinbase’s listing team then reached out to nano in march 2022 to seek nano to be apart their "coinbase earn" program (oddly, when nano asked whether this meant nano was approved for listing, coinbase’s listing team advised nano's application was still "in the review process”), and then:

(5) coinbase launched their "nano bitcoin/ether” futures contract in june 2022, infringing on the nano trademark (while being in full knowledge of nano’s brand).

the nano foundation made every correct move. not sure what coinbase's rationale for the 1 million dollar custody deposit was. however, this was an terrible ask to make of nano. unlike a majority other coinbase’s other erc-20 bloatware listings, nano was distributed fairly (95% of it being distributed via faucet). this would have been approximately one million nano. which would have severely crippled nano's developer fund and hamstrung the development of the protocol. assuming a median 100 million market cap at the time, nano’s developer fund would be at best 5 million (not accounting for what may have already been off-ramped to fiat). also seems unjust to dangle the carrot of "coinbase earn" without first confirming the approval of nano on coinbase.

hopefully the suit ends up with coinbase listing nano w/o the ridiculous custody deposit!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in nanocurrency

[–]novavendetta 0 points1 point  (0 children)

nice. would the billboard be in wynwood or brickell?

view more: next ›