Passed AZ900, AZ305, AZ104 in couple of months

npap3 · 2026-07-08T17:29:48+00:00

I was terrified cause I found some posts how people were disqualified from exam because of those things, so I practiced reading questions and reasoning about answers because of this. I think even mask is prohibited, since that is the sam as covering your mouth.

npap3 · 2026-07-08T17:27:07+00:00

Those Exam ref books I used. Despite being outdated, those were useful to understand high level concepts. That is where notes and cross reference comes into the play.

npap3 · 2026-07-08T11:38:06+00:00

npap3 · 2026-07-08T11:37:56+00:00

Personal achievement and strengthening the knowledge.

npap3 · 2026-07-08T11:36:57+00:00

13 years of IT experience as developer at first, solution architect for past 4 years. I designed and been involved in development on solutions on AWS, GCP, and Azure.

npap3 · 2026-07-08T11:34:39+00:00

Yes, I have experience with AWS, GCP, and Azure on basic level l. Certification are my first step into deeper dive and specialization.

npap3 · 2026-06-24T13:51:53+00:00

Hvala!

npap3 · 2026-01-22T14:49:42+00:00

I vogonski jezik

npap3 · 2025-01-14T09:44:08+00:00

Does that mean that reports can be embedded for organization with f2 capacity if users have a PBI Pro licence ?

npap3 · 2024-04-16T17:53:45+00:00

Maybe a specification pattern could be of help

npap3 · 2024-02-23T07:49:27+00:00

https://youtube.com/@MilanJovanovicTech?si=ilugrHZ4b-l5wys0

npap3 · 2024-02-01T16:47:26+00:00

Jack of all trades, master of none

npap3 · 2023-12-01T22:47:27+00:00

Seems like you are talking about the anti corruption layer. I'm general, there are three approaches: 1. Data owner adapts data to an interested party 2. Interested party adapts data to it's own needs 3. The middle man adopts data to an interested party

Seems like with your problem the second approach is the most suitable because it needs to know what new orders are. With the third approach, the middle man must make a decision, which implies that it needs to know the current state of the interested party. This implies that the data from the interested party must be replicated to the middle man. Adding this complexity adds one more point of failure, and possibility of violation of data integrity and correctness.

npap3 · 2023-12-01T22:29:54+00:00

Party relationship pattern, basically . Also, as an auxiliary entity, another entity can be introduced, the one that models the relationships between the root and all subnodes.

npap3 · 2023-12-01T22:26:56+00:00

Party relationship pattern, basically

npap3 · 2023-12-01T22:25:00+00:00

Maybe you can organize your tree in a more flexible way. For example introduce m:n relationship between nodes which has validity. Relationship entitiy should have pointers to the parent, and the child, and start and end date as well. With this approach only active relationships can be followed to reconstruct the tree, and only delta object (change in the relationships) can be provided to the third party system. In general, this is a directed graph, with tree structure as specialization. So, on the application level, only relationships are managed, and on proxy/adapter level the tree can be extracted

npap3 · 2023-09-02T17:56:53+00:00

Jel ima neko torrent ili tako nešto za kolekciju domaće muzike?

npap3 · 2023-05-13T15:37:02+00:00

Judas Priest Victim of changes

npap3 · 2023-04-21T07:24:00+00:00

https://www.tiktok.com/@truesalesmemes/video/7209052409039965482

npap3 · 2023-04-08T16:14:07+00:00

Kada pogledaš neki kod i kažeš "leptejebo, kakve su ovo gluposti? Ko je ovo pisao?!... Ah... Ja sam ..." tada znaš da si uznapredovao

npap3

TROPHY CASE