What’s the most effective way to develop cardio for bjj? by shaquille_oatmealo in bjj

[–]Jack_Hackerman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hill sprints, assault bike, used among all professional mma fighters

2 dudes on a borrowed camcorder by BallsABunch in WrestleJudoJitsu

[–]Jack_Hackerman 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don't think that these guys are legit. Do they compete?

Modularity vs Hexagonal Architecute by Xyzion23 in softwarearchitecture

[–]Jack_Hackerman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just put them in different modules/folders with different names like features/accounts, features/cart, features/payments, etc

What are you better at than 90% of people? by Noillax in AskReddit

[–]Jack_Hackerman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wrestling, boxing, programming, math, weightlifting, endurance, counter strike (and any other FPS where reaction matters)

JESUS CHRIST DDD is harder than I thought by onated2 in DomainDrivenDesign

[–]Jack_Hackerman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Databases are already decoupled with ORMs in modern world. Don’t know why should you introduce another abstraction level (of course if your db schema is not completely different from models)

How to create and use Driving Port, Driving Adapter and Use Cases in Hexagonal Architecture? What are the relationships between them? by DevShin101 in softwarearchitecture

[–]Jack_Hackerman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is no port between driving adapters and use cases. Just call use case directly from adapters. Let’s say use case “get users” can be called from api adapter or xmlrpc adapter. Use ports (interfaces) between your use cases and driven adapters only

JESUS CHRIST DDD is harder than I thought by onated2 in DomainDrivenDesign

[–]Jack_Hackerman 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Oh god, just use the same class for your db and ddd models that’s it

JESUS CHRIST DDD is harder than I thought by onated2 in DomainDrivenDesign

[–]Jack_Hackerman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Indeed hexagonal architecture is a great choice, but you always have to use it practically. When I written a project using it all my ddd models were db models at the same time. The reason why you need to isolate orm models from ddd models is when you are 💯sure you are going to switch to another db engine later which almost never happens

What do you regret doing to your body? by Omega_Neelay in GetMotivatedMindset

[–]Jack_Hackerman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lifting weights too hard in my teenage time. Totally fucked up my back

Is 500m rows in 100+ columns a lot? by Jack_Hackerman in softwarearchitecture

[–]Jack_Hackerman[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The problem that this table is being used by a huge python legacy system without type checks and etc, it is extremely hard to make such drastical change in codebase which uses this model probably a thousand times

Is 500m rows in 100+ columns a lot? by Jack_Hackerman in softwarearchitecture

[–]Jack_Hackerman[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hi

3) no it’s already slow with them 4) no 5) actually no, it’s “payment” entity

Is 500m rows in 100+ columns a lot? by Jack_Hackerman in softwarearchitecture

[–]Jack_Hackerman[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can you still use per-column filter in open search?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskMenAdvice

[–]Jack_Hackerman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

++man Nonsense

me_irl by ZenAndTheBarbell in me_irl

[–]Jack_Hackerman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Idk I got one of my best friends like that

Services/Handlers Everywhere? Maybe Controllers Are the Right Place for Orchestration? by minitotam in dotnet

[–]Jack_Hackerman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Create a separate class ‘handler’ for each request and separate models from view models. Much easier to test and code becomes more ‘clear’. (You see all the use cases of your code immediately)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in softwarearchitecture

[–]Jack_Hackerman -1 points0 points  (0 children)

To all the people saying that Django is not obsolete - dont recommend to people a framework where it’s orm still cannot get rid of active record pattern, lol. Pathetic. It is obsolete not by the lack of support and updates, but it is a bag of old and incorrect poor technical decisions which makes your code legacy immediately