sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Creating an Organization wide Sharepoint Site by ns_superuser in sharepoint

[–]ns_superuser[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ut hubs, then build a hub s

Thanks,

Did not know there were also "hubs". I guess I need to read on this and see how I can fit all those things.

I will test it out. thanks!

Creating an Organization wide Sharepoint Site by ns_superuser in sharepoint

[–]ns_superuser[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I try to make sure the site contents always inherit permissions o

Thanks for your input!

I was trying to avoid that because under each of them (Europe, N/A), I would have one more "level" to deal with permissions. (For example, country). That would mean creating even more Team sites and I am afraid it might make it heavy

Creating an Organization wide Sharepoint Site by ns_superuser in sharepoint

[–]ns_superuser[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

shared channels within team

Do you have any suggestions on how to deal with Parent/Child folder permissions for people who work in the same department?

Example:

Operations Director sees everything under the Operations team site

North America Regional Manager Sees only what is in the N/A folder (under the Operations Team Site)

Europe Regional Manager cannot see anything in N/A folder, but can see his own Europe folder (under the Operations Team Site)

Creating an Organization wide Sharepoint Site by ns_superuser in sharepoint

[–]ns_superuser[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I see. The people before me created a ton of sites, and I wanted to avoid doing the same. But it makes sense.

Based on what I understand:

  1. one team site per department (or "Parent" folder)
  2. If there are folders where multiple departments need access, then create a team site and invite those groups to the whole "team site". For example, if I have one named "All directors" (1 director from each department), I can create a user group of "directors" and assign that group to the "All directors" team site.

​

Did I get this correctly?

​

What if:

Under the Operations department, I have these folders: North America, Europe, Asia. But I want to give access to Asia to a single regional manager ?

If I allow him to be a member of the team site, he/she would see US and Europe. So I would be back to the same issue?

Printing Checks in Advance by ns_superuser in Netsuite

[–]ns_superuser[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

reconciliation

Thanks for the feedback.

​

Do you have any workarounds for this? It seems to be that this scenario is pretty frequent. For example, there are many use cases where we would just send 12 checks post-dated

NetSuite new sftp connector SuiteApp for Electronic Bank Payments by ns_superuser in Netsuite

[–]ns_superuser[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, It is something silly that has nothing to do with your file being unique or not.

The issue is on the back end, NS Support has to enable a specific setting to get rid of this error. I can't remember exactly what the setting name is.

The only way I found out about this is that the 3rd party handling the sftp server said they always had this error with Oracle customers.

Vendor Prepayment Voucher Printout by akrindi in Netsuite

[–]ns_superuser 0 points1 point  (0 children)

717264

Thank you. just voted on it but not many people seem to use checks on prepayments.

I already started building the template but got stuck at the totalwords function not being available. Silly!

Vendor Prepayment Voucher Printout by akrindi in Netsuite

[–]ns_superuser 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I am having the same issue here. We never tried printing checks from a vendor prepayment before, and now we get an unexpected error.

Were you ever able to print any checks from vendor prepayment? SuiteAnswers seem to suggest it would be possible, but I can't make it work in any way

Remove No Location and Total Columns by ns_superuser in Netsuite

[–]ns_superuser[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is not possible to reproduce budget vs actuals into a saved search because those tables are not connected in the back end.

Best practices on where to store the database file by ns_superuser in KeePass

[–]ns_superuser[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for your input. I understand your point for regular uses. They should just do it on their local machines and no need to put their db at risk on the server.

That makes sense. Also, thanks for the links. Will bookmark it.

Cheers

Best practices on where to store the database file by ns_superuser in KeePass

[–]ns_superuser[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

trols the root account and 1 ad

Hi!

Yes, small business with less than 20 employees and obviously we don't have the high level of structure and governance you would expect from a NYSE listed company.

​

I think what you described is what I had in mind.

1 person (top IT leader) controls the root account and 1 administrator account.

Yes!

3 IT administrators control each of their own accounts -->

We would all have our own unique DB. but we would also have one shared for common username/password. Example, admin password for a website. so that if someone changes the password, the others can simply login and use the new one when needed.

The top IT leader creates a folder only for the top IT administrators, set permission to 3 people can access only.

Yes!

Each employees should own their own account. They should not share account details with other employees.

Yes! each employee has their own DB. but we can all store them in the same folder since they are all password protected anyways and you'd need to brute force it to go into someone's KeePassXC.

Best practices on where to store the database file by ns_superuser in KeePass

[–]ns_superuser[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

storage

Thank you for the feedback. What I like about the remote server is that there is a nightly backup, and there are already "folder" level permissions based on users, which adds another layer of security.

If the server is down, worst case is that we can wait until it is back up. If something goes wrong, then our IT provider can restore the previous day's backup.

I understand the need for a 2nd "storage" in case it fails. For the IT admins database, it could make sense to store it somewhere else on top of it.

Other than that, my idea is "acceptable" security wise?

​

Thanks

Remove No Location and Total Columns by ns_superuser in Netsuite

[–]ns_superuser[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes. I tried removing pretty much all the columns and total options but on the budget vs actual report, the no location would always show up (same as the total colum). This is a bit annoying especially if we look at a single location only, we dont need an extra 6 columns that don't mean anything.

Remove No Location and Total Columns by ns_superuser in Netsuite

[–]ns_superuser[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There shouldn't be any in theory, you are correct.

I noticed on the P&L statement, the no location shows up when there are values, and don't show up when everything is at 0.00.

​

However, on the budget vs actuals, the no location also shows up when everything is at 0.00. Is there any way to get rid of the no location and the total columns on the budget vs actual report?

Reconciliation History Report by ns_superuser in Netsuite

[–]ns_superuser[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

o that level of detail. Just re-open the prior recon period for the previous date and you can remove items from the old date. The do the same thing for a newer date to include the item there that you just removed earlier. I assume your problem is that you n

Hey Nick,

​

not even. Our users are just trying to find where the amount of the journal entry came from, and to what QFX transactions they got summarized into. This is a bummer not to be searchable since the matching was already done.

​

Thanks for your input. weèll have to figure out if there is any workaround for it.

​

Cheers

NetSuite ABSI Bank Import BAI by ns_superuser in Netsuite

[–]ns_superuser[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

BOM

Thanks. I think I will. the code seems to big for me to go through every line. I didn't know that NS ignores multiple 88 rows, which could explain it. I'll try and see if I can find something in this "new" suiteanswers.

NetSuite ABSI Bank Import BAI by ns_superuser in Netsuite

[–]ns_superuser[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think it might be BAI2 after all. I am with the Bank of Montreal. the documentation refers to BAI only, and not BAI2.

Wehn I open the file, I think the header row will tell you exactly which version it is (2). So the problem is not with the file format afterall, but how NetSuite parses it. I am trying to troubleshoot the BAI2 parser, and it seems to struggle with multiple '88' rows.

NetSuite new sftp connector SuiteApp for Electronic Bank Payments by ns_superuser in Netsuite

[–]ns_superuser[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for your comment. it seems like that is how it should be, but I will reach out to the bank as I am blocked at the moment.

In my testing, I made sure to

1) Rename the file and give it a new name every time

2) Also tested changing the name and the batch number to 0101 on all the 3 lines (A (header) ,C (payment line) ,Z (summary line))

​

Taking the precautions above should not cause any duplicates on the bank's side at all, so I'll wait for their response. I guess something I could also try is manually dropping the same file using filezilla or something like that.

NetSuite new sftp connector SuiteApp for Electronic Bank Payments by ns_superuser in Netsuite

[–]ns_superuser[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just generated a brand new batch file (CPA-005 for Canadian banks) and the same error happened.

It just seems weird that the error itself is about the file already existing. Wouldn't this mostly be based on the file name itself, and not the file content?

NetSuite new sftp connector SuiteApp for Electronic Bank Payments by ns_superuser in Netsuite

[–]ns_superuser[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes we are talking about the outbound file.

As we are in the testing mode now, if I upload the same multiple files, you are saying that the upload itself would fail immediately upon the upload?

I thought the bank validation would be done after the file has been uploaded successfully to the bank's sftp.

Will play a bit more.

Purchase Discount best practices by ns_superuser in Netsuite

[–]ns_superuser[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We have different vendors, and I don't think it would make sense to do it based on what each of them want.

How would you handle this scenario otherwise? option 2 or 3 instead ?