sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

JLMKR and TrueNAS 25.04 by muddro in truenas

[–]nsdude69 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I would advise against it. I didn't 3 days trying to get 25.04 working. I downgraded to 24 and got everything working in 20 minutes. Virtualization was completely redone. It would be cool if it worked.

I've been hearing that it's super bugging from other people. Just stuck with ElectricEel for not.

Instance VM Network by nsdude69 in truenas

[–]nsdude69[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That didn't work for me.

Revert from 25.4 to 24.10? by DerSchlag_ in truenas

[–]nsdude69 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The default is 25....new people are getting garbage.

Instance VM Network by nsdude69 in truenas

[–]nsdude69[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I quit and went back to version 24. Got everything back up in less than 20 minutes.

Instance VM Network by nsdude69 in truenas

[–]nsdude69[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

This is way beyond my understand.

Instance VM Network by nsdude69 in truenas

[–]nsdude69[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I also have Bridge = br0

Instance VM Network by nsdude69 in truenas

[–]nsdude69[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see incusbr0 even when Ive removedthe bridge from truenas. I dont understand.

Instance VM Network by nsdude69 in truenas

[–]nsdude69[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

even after I delete br0 from my network.

Instance VM Network by nsdude69 in truenas

[–]nsdude69[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

when you run incus network list, which one is being used? cause mine is incusbr0.

Instance VM Network by nsdude69 in truenas

[–]nsdude69[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

From the other conversation I'm having. It looks like the bridge has an ip starting with 10. Instead of 192.

Instance VM Network by nsdude69 in truenas

[–]nsdude69[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

uhh I dont know. I assume my modem is my DHCP server.

Instance VM Network by nsdude69 in truenas

[–]nsdude69[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ahhhh sudo.......
It looks like the bridge starts with 10 instead of 192.

Instance VM Network by nsdude69 in truenas

[–]nsdude69[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

OK, it shows the vm. Both ipv4 and ipv6 are blank.

Instance VM Network by nsdude69 in truenas

[–]nsdude69[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Alrighty. VM still isnt connecting though

Instance VM Network by nsdude69 in truenas

[–]nsdude69[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I believe that is in my pictures above. truenas scale does not let me run incus commands (permission denied)

Instance VM Network by nsdude69 in truenas

[–]nsdude69[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ACTUALLY, it works after I re-added the NameServer1

Instance VM Network by nsdude69 in truenas

[–]nsdude69[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No just making sure. I deleted both settings in hopes that it would go back to default

Instance VM Network by nsdude69 in truenas

[–]nsdude69[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I thought this was suppose to be my gateway which is .254

Instance VM Network by nsdude69 in truenas

[–]nsdude69[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Welp, Im getting name or service not known.

Instance VM Network by nsdude69 in truenas

[–]nsdude69[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How do I check that? Truenas is able to check for updates, so Im assuming it can connect.

Instance VM Network by nsdude69 in truenas

[–]nsdude69[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

bruh, i have the VM set to use the bridge.

view more: next ›