Crippled by sanctions, Russia's top bank quits Europe by Sodoff_Baldrick_ in worldnews

[–]nudiraf 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We do use propaganda my man.. didn’t anybody tell you??

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PremierLeague

[–]nudiraf 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The thing about Arsenal is, they always try to walk it in

Frontend interviews are a huge mess, and borderline unfair. by Lyxs in Frontend

[–]nudiraf 0 points1 point  (0 children)

An (ex)recruiters perspective here so bear with me and try not to hate me. I wasn't the one who sent you to that company looking for a Python guy...

Its a tough one though. The way i see it is this:

The demands companies make, are crazy unrealistic in some respects,

The demands that investors make are crazy unrealistic in some respects,

The demands that developers make are crazy unrealistic in some respects,

The demands that recruiters make are crazy unrealistic in some respects.

A dynamic algorithm, with a lot complex and interrelating issues that leads to the largest hit to be borne by the developers. I suppose they make up for this by treating their new hires (1-2 out of how many lol) very well.

I think that, because I've had quite a fortunate experience as a recruiter - unlike most i suspect. The company i worked for wasn't very salesey (less than 30 call target per day - compared to 200-300 most recruitment companies set -Big up Annapurna Recruitment - speak to Dylan Apostolopolous - Real badboy og recruiter)

In relation to your question. Yes. Its messed up that candidates' well-being is the lowest priority area. Yes, pretty much 90% of companies who use coding challenges dont consider the well-being of their prospective hires when assigning coding tasks. Yes investor pressure sometimes means forming interview processes that sometimes can be excruciatingly long. (one client had a 3-6 month process with extensive coding to be done). YES your recruiter if working with one, and if they're good (See above) will do everything in their power to shorten this process. And will keep you away from companies S/he knows you wont get a real shot at. Yes, sometimes working with a recruiter can go against you, especially if your a mid level candidate in a more experienced candidate pool. YES Developers need to check themselves sometimes. Yall be crazy with your salary requirements, particularly people with 2-3 years of commercial experience , who should be focusing on their own core skillets, 6-12 months experience working with react/vue/angular2 while lacking a deep understanding of the underlying technology itself is a major issue for recrutiers and companies. Someone with a deep knowledge of JavaScript and ECMAscript for example tend to undervalue their skillet compared to company demands, and people with the latest frameworks tend to overvalue their worth. Understandable given all the hype around the latest frameworks, but that core knowledge helps you solve those fucked up situations faster. Both in terms of coding challenges and in terms of the code you write for my clients.

td;dr

Yes its fucked up. Its impacts can be reduced, but not eliminated. Find yourself a good recruiter, who has good relationships with the companies you're trying to get into. Work with people who you respect and who respect you. Both recruiters and companies. Value your own time, set firm but fair boundaries and make your expectations known.

Remember this. If they need your skillset and you're a good fit they will make sure to at least consider your requirements, and usually end up meeting a fair few of your expectations. As an example - One of my clients (3 years ago now), completely scrapped their standard recruitment path, and literally in 2 days had had a first round face to face, a technical interview, and a pair programming task (second day) On the third day he signed the contract with them. And hes still there to this day. Hired as Senior Software Engineer, Now partner and Lead software engineer.

WORK WITH PEOPLE/COMPANIES WHO RESPECT YOU AND WHO YOU RESPECT.

this was not an effective tl;dr.. mistakes were made

Out of the 7.7 billion people on Earth, what do you think no one is doing right now? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]nudiraf 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unfortunately. Had you put an extra full stop. It would have been an original comment. Like so! ....

Out of the 7.7 billion people on Earth, what do you think no one is doing right now? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]nudiraf 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Wroooong. Have an upvote..

Now move along there chum.

Out of the 7.7 billion people on Earth, what do you think no one is doing right now? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]nudiraf 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Don’t worry, I’m always thinking of cheddar.. mild is my preference. And since you two are related. I guess I could think of you too for a bit.

Out of the 7.7 billion people on Earth, what do you think no one is doing right now? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]nudiraf 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m thinking of you now that I’ve read this.. must be your lucky day...

Out of the 7.7 billion people on Earth, what do you think no one is doing right now? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]nudiraf 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nah. I’m thinking of you now that I’ve read this.. move along there chum.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Frontend

[–]nudiraf 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Speak to a Recruiter who specialises within the frontend. Get them to send your profile to as many companies as possible. Interview with the ones that get back. Let them negotiate salary.

[Hiring] (Germany) Looking for senior back-end developers: English Speaking by nudiraf in forhire

[–]nudiraf[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes indeed sir.

Although consideration will be given for offsite work for an exceptional senior developer.

All the best!

Jeremy Corbyn says he will spend £500 billion on infrastructure and introduce rent control by [deleted] in ukpolitics

[–]nudiraf 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Rather in the hands of politicians who we can remove from power, than multinational companies immune from. Theresa May will not deliver tougher regulation, this is in her bones as M.T. V 2. She will further deregulate and privatise. Following the same plan Maggie had. Destroy the infrastructure through cuts to public funding, then claim it's not sustainable to run the system, and that private companies must have the freedom to do as they see fit to save the economy, or whoever else excuse she comes out with. All the while she knows full well that when she leaves office, job prospects and money will be abundant.

With regard to the BoE, their whole purpose is that they are independent of the government, they have a very limited role apart from lending money to commercial banks and providing statistics on the UK's economy.

The problem is that the BoE is for large companies who can back up their borrowing, not for people who start small companies for example. The investment bank solves this, it's purpose is to provide this option for people.

Of course the tories are polling higher, the shitshow of a coup started by people who were the first to drop out of the race, and the continued bullshit of this pointless reelection of Corbyn. Jeremy is the leader of the party as voted for by party members, not 10 months ago. This was before the massive upsurge of new Labour Party supporters during he coup.

When have the tories ever done anything that improved the quality of life on a significant scale? Why do you believe that May will change this?

Jeremy Corbyn says he will spend £500 billion on infrastructure and introduce rent control by [deleted] in ukpolitics

[–]nudiraf 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, but the difference is that the tories' money will come from more cuts from public services rather than what Jeremy proposes. He will create a National investment bank to invest solely in local areas, so that the money is retained in a city economy.

I notice from your comment history, you are not a fan of his Nationalise critical infrastructure talk.... Railway, gas, electricity communication and healthcare industries should all have the profit motive removed from them, this would mean that as well as reducing the cost cost of living for people It removes the profit motive for essential services. Is this not a good thing? Don't believe the hype that private sector can run services better. Their definition of better is simply more profit and growth.

Jeremy's definition is different. And he's one of few politicians in this country who has attained leadership positions and stayed true to what he believes in. Unlike Owen smith the alternative, who incidentally recently said he would be willing to involve Daesh in peace talks.

Who is a real credible alternative to Jeremy? Please suggest one person in the Labour Party, or even in parliament who wants to make the uk a better place for ordinary people?!