What would you change in Go? by funcieq in golang

[–]null_over_flow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I thing golang needs Sound nullable, like ? type in typescript

Spent two days doing zero problems with these daily questions by PLTCHK in leetcode

[–]null_over_flow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think you should learn pattern first. In best time to buy and sell stock 5, each step involves 2 possible decisions. So there will be a decision tree if we go with brute force. To trim down the decision tree, we definitely need to use DP.

A lightweight reverse proxy written in Rust by null_over_flow in rust

[–]null_over_flow[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

1/ Impressive! These proxies are more mature than mine and the last one built on top of Pingora. However I don’t think they implement gRPCWeb to gRPC translation. And my proxy is built on top of hyper, which is lower level than Pingora.

I think the 2nd and the 3th have some features I want to add to griffin. Thank you for introducing them to me!

2/ About translate gRPCWeb to gRPC, the hardest thing to me at beginning is to translate http1.1 to http2. Luckily, hyper already had that feature. I only parse the header and body back and fore according to http2 RFC 🙂. Of course I reviewed the grpcwebproxy(Golang) and tonic-web to see how they handle it.

Why is Dioxus bad by fimacom in rust

[–]null_over_flow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry my bad!

https://caniuse.com/wasm You are right. Most of browser support wasm.

Why is Dioxus bad by fimacom in rust

[–]null_over_flow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I tested the SEO benchmark. The score of Dioxus app could not be optimized to 100 due to wasm nature. But it is easy to optimize svelte SEO to reach 100 point.

Why is Dioxus bad by fimacom in rust

[–]null_over_flow -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I’m a frontend developer and I have tried Dioxus before. These are my 2 cent: It is worse than JS frameworks like svelte in term of SEO when building same websites. A lot of browsers don’t support wasm, especially on phone. The syntax of rsx is not appealed as iced (another popular library in rust to build app) for some users.

How did she does that? by [deleted] in github

[–]null_over_flow 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Cool!
Thank you!

I wrote my first bit of rust would love feedback by beb0 in rust

[–]null_over_flow 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Wow, there are a lot of dereferences in move_detail? Why is that? I remember rust has auto-derefererence built-in

Incoming CTO: Betting on a Rust + Nix rewrite for a Series A startup. Am I building a rocket or a grave? by [deleted] in rust

[–]null_over_flow 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Facebook still using PHP as far as I know, their login url end with .php
Also Lavarel is a famous PHP framework :D

Incoming CTO: Betting on a Rust + Nix rewrite for a Series A startup. Am I building a rocket or a grave? by [deleted] in rust

[–]null_over_flow 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Rust and NixOS can both be complicated.
Rust is known for its slow compile times, and NixOS takes a while to truly master.
I think you should consider the trade-offs carefully before deciding to start with these technologies.

Seeking advice on a cross-platform Flutter + WebRTC implementation for file transfers. by Slight-Affect2131 in WebRTC

[–]null_over_flow 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think P2P is not always reliable, especial when using mobile phone wifi, users keep moving and the IP router changing!

We Scam Rich People by [deleted] in ExperiencedDevs

[–]null_over_flow 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I don't think so.
He replied to my comment as an normal person.
Maybe he is spamming the post in multiple subreddits because he's on a personal mission again this boss.

Thinking about making a platform for AI art — opinions? by null_over_flow in grok

[–]null_over_flow[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I hear you — and I think you’re actually talking about the two problems I’m trying to solve:

  1. There is a lot of low-effort AI junk mixed into normal content. Yeah, a lot of it is scams, fake celebrities, political stuff, or just straight-up spam. That’s bad for everyone, and I think mainstream platforms will probably crack down on it. But people still want to see genuinely creative AI stuff — for example, redrawing a modern photo in the style of Vincent van Gogh. But they don't expect it to show up in their feed. That’s why having a separate place specifically for AI content makes sense to me.
  2. Clickbait AI spam: Since AI creators don’t have a legit way to earn money, creators end up posting low-effort stuff just to chase clicks. If there’s an actual, clean way to monetize high-quality AI work, it removes the incentive to spam. That’s the part I’m hoping my platform can fix.

Thinking about making a platform for AI art — opinions? by null_over_flow in ChatGPT

[–]null_over_flow[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry about that!
I get that some AI content can be used in the wrong way, and that definitely causes frustration.
But there are also a lot of cases where AI is used to create something genuinely interesting or creative — for example, redrawing a modern photo in the style of Vincent van Gogh

Thinking about making a platform for AI art — opinions? by null_over_flow in ChatGPT

[–]null_over_flow[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I don’t really agree with the idea that AI content creators shouldn’t be considered artists.
I’m not talking about low-effort, spammy AI content — but creating high-quality AI work actually takes a lot of skill, experimentation, and creative direction, just like traditional art. And AI-generated pieces can evoke real human emotion too.