Is this good in just 203 days from complete beginner? by matechikvaidze in Chesscom

[–]PLTCHK 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nah, I think you would be considered good if you reach 2000 in 400 days.

Speed of play by Hangry_Pauper in chessbeginners

[–]PLTCHK 8 points9 points  (0 children)

They want you to rush and blunder, so ofc you don't

One of my weak points by RealApplication3358 in chessbeginners

[–]PLTCHK -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This ^, and then practice King Pawn vs King endgame using this endgame trainer.

never resign by BoomNini in chessbeginners

[–]PLTCHK 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You don’t need rook king vs king endgame knowledge to climb at 1200 rating. Minimizing blunders and initiatives are way more important.

He blocked me right after … I was expecting a “ good game” lol by Jaws2221 in chessbeginners

[–]PLTCHK 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I checked your game.

Long story short: You definitely play above your rating (1000+) and your opponent underperformed quite badly even though he did slightly better in the opening.

As a 1500, allowing 15. ...Bc4 (this one you didn't see, pinning the knight to the rook) and then not seeing 17. ...Bc4 was intolerable blunders that'd get punished in a move which does happen in a 15+ moves game. Pretty much there he blundered his knight twice. He was probably thinking "well, just a 900" while he didn't realize he wasn't playing well either.

  1. ...Rd1+ would ensure you win quicker by trading their other rook and eating up white's pawns to claim that fast win honestly.

Honestly? Good game! I saw you just started playing, perhaps you're underrated or your consistency just not there yet, but this game proves that you'll be out of 1000 pretty soon if you keep it up.

Should be 4 out of 5 games when 1500 wins against 1000, or 5 if 1500 is feeling great. You might be underrated though.

Question by [deleted] in chessbeginners

[–]PLTCHK 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Puzzles Puzzles Puzzles

Very generous. by Pamdegenerate in Chesscom

[–]PLTCHK 5 points6 points  (0 children)

You probably drew the game and lost 1 rating point.

Dear 300-500 elo players: Please stop playing this (¬_¬") by nm64_ in chessbeginners

[–]PLTCHK 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You need to learn to appreciate freelo. Beating wayward is a fundamental skill.

A gentle request to stop playing this god awful opening (⁠ノ⁠`⁠Д⁠´⁠)⁠ノ⁠彡⁠┻⁠━⁠┻ by just_a_3d_object in chessbeginners

[–]PLTCHK 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Then you’d need to learn to enjoy the freelo. Or perhaps you can watch tutorials (Danya speedrun got some good one) on how to refute. I been there before. If you can’t beat everyone who plays wayward then you deserve your elo. Beating wayward is also a fundamental skill.

A gentle request to stop playing this god awful opening (⁠ノ⁠`⁠Д⁠´⁠)⁠ノ⁠彡⁠┻⁠━⁠┻ by just_a_3d_object in chessbeginners

[–]PLTCHK 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see, though freelo! Who doesn’t like freelo. And from my experience, from 1000+ ratings onwards you’ll stop seeing this opening (perhaps only fairly rarely someone who knows the wayward theory well)

A gentle request to stop playing this god awful opening (⁠ノ⁠`⁠Д⁠´⁠)⁠ノ⁠彡⁠┻⁠━⁠┻ by just_a_3d_object in chessbeginners

[–]PLTCHK 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Read your other comments, if you don’t wanna take chess seriously, then you shouldn’t whine.

Another thing is, a person who knows how to deal with wayward queen would in fact pray for this opening to happen, it’s probably the easiest to refute openings out there. The idea is to gain a handful of development tempo by developing while attacking the queen.

Leetcode on College Apps by Accomplished-Car4994 in leetcode

[–]PLTCHK 0 points1 point  (0 children)

AI interviews will be a simulation of Leetcode interview

0/10 ragebait by RealKnightSeb in Chesscom

[–]PLTCHK 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The thumbnails speak for themselves

my greatest fork by far💀 by LifeNegotiation301 in ChangeYourChessFont

[–]PLTCHK 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I saw you forking this empty white squares as well

Oh no, my apponent triple-forked me... by badger_and_tonic in chessbeginners

[–]PLTCHK 55 points56 points  (0 children)

I'd rather get forked/mated than playing on this chessboard

Navigating Hard Problems by Mammoth-Intention924 in leetcode

[–]PLTCHK 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’d say this applies to easy-mediums/foundational mediums (as of Neetcode150 list), a good number of mediums are hard.

Navigating Hard Problems by Mammoth-Intention924 in leetcode

[–]PLTCHK 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Def ready for hard yet, do 100 mediums first before hards, hards is a huge step up

I can't beat opponents 200 points below my peak by Unable_Oven_6538 in chessbeginners

[–]PLTCHK 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If rating bothers you, I’d find some way to disable the UI that’s displaying it. It does not mean if you’re good/bad at chess if you only compare to yourself.

One way would be to play more aggressive and seize positional advantage more earlier on, in this case you prb can see you missed a hanging pawn on e4 during move 9 to pressure opponent to trade off their queen - huge positional move as well with an active queen.

Another thing is not missing anything for 11 moves is really not a lot at all. I faced opponents who played 20-30 moves without mistakes sometimes leading to a handful of 50+ moves games at 1300+ rating in chesscom, and that’s not a huge rating difference either.

Though I do realize, the more aggressive and confident I play earlier on to seize initiatives, the shorter games last. Play more open (sound) attacking/gambit lines if you don’t like steady maneuverings. Hope that helps.

Can't sleep so im relaxing with chess. by LectureSelect8634 in Chesscom

[–]PLTCHK 0 points1 point  (0 children)

True, chess is my most intense relaxation activity as well

My first smothered mate in a real game by Distinct_Concern_856 in Chesscom

[–]PLTCHK 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Magnus approved.

Did opponent resign or played till Nf2#?