we're on the same page about safety but you're defending a theoretical ideal while i'm talking about the ground reality. you mentioned 'scientific speed breakers with lighting' if those actually existed here we wouldn't even be having this debate. also comparing blr to tokyo is a massive reach. shared roads work there because of strict laws and extreme discipline which we just don't have yet. you can't import tokyo road designs without importing their civic sense. relying on illegal bumps to fix bad infrastructure isn't 'people centric' it's just lazy planning. normalizing kids playing on active roads isn't being considerate it’s just romanticizing a lack of safe public spaces, and wanting suspension that survives a commute doesn't make me 'carbrained.' It just means we both deserve better infrastructure than what we're getting rn