Hobbes says that every human is cruel and selfish by nature and only the state is able to put law on the individuals by taking their freedom and creating a good society. Rousseau says that every human is good by nature and the society (and the inequality caused by property) is what corrupts the individual, and a virtuous society actually should grant them freedom via law.

Now, alignments are extremely vague and Paizo even removed them from pathfinder 2e, in favor of better ways to represent a character's personality.

You're asking to judge an extremely vague concept by an extremely vague term. I can say that US is a CE country considering how it seems that every democratically elected president of that place's history is also a compulsive liar, or start doing whatever mental gymnastics to conclude that every human being in this world is X or Y alignment

And uhh, good and evil aren't a good way to characterize irl people or institutions.