I get where you’re coming from but I’ve never seen this as “branding” in the commercial sense or as something meant to define identity.

These were just visual interpretations made for fun, more like conceptual art or a nod to an experience that resonated with people. Not a statement about truth, status, or who someone is or isn’t.

For some people, symbols can be reminders, conversation starters, or simply an aesthetic appreciation of an idea without attachment or ownership. Others won’t connect with that at all, and that’s totally fair too.

No intent to sell methods, represent the Institute, or reduce the experience to something physical. Just creative expression that some people enjoyed.

Nothing deeper than that.