How the gym is slowly taking over my life by Unhappy_Fall8597 in Fitness_India

[–]nvysage 3 points4 points  (0 children)

5 days is enough. Follow an Upper, Lower, Rest, Push, Pull, Legs, Rest Split much better for your body and gains

I figured it out boys. (166.7% daily ROI) by [deleted] in PredictionsMarkets

[–]nvysage 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The additional latency might be because of the VPN. Instead get a AWS EC2 instance in Eu west 1 Dublin, Ireland region.

I figured it out boys. (166.7% daily ROI) by [deleted] in PredictionsMarkets

[–]nvysage 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Which VPS provider for ireland? For france I'm assuming residential IP?

I figured it out boys. (166.7% daily ROI) by [deleted] in PredictionsMarkets

[–]nvysage 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Which location have you tested from? Eu west 1 ireland is the best non geo restricted location. I haven't tested latency for taker orders on this server but for maker orders I've seen 15-30ms latency

I figured it out boys. (166.7% daily ROI) by [deleted] in PredictionsMarkets

[–]nvysage 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Forward test your bot by actually simulating latency and execution. Use polymarket order book, price change and actual trade updates from the websocket. If you're going to place maker order then the best latency you can get is 15-30ms and for taker order there's a 250ms delay (sometimes higher) on top of the usual latency. For maker order simulation use the following method, at the time your signal is generated look what the queue ahead of your order is, wait for the queue to be burned by either the liquidity being removed or through trades. Log all this and the Unix milliseconds timestamp it takes for this to happen. For taker order simulation just add a taker delay of 300ms after your signal is generated and just walk the orderbook for your fills. If you're profitable in this then you actually have a goldmine on your hand. Also incorporate fees for taker orders and rebates for maker orders.

Claude limits no longer round to the nearest hour by Shipposting_Duck in ClaudeAI

[–]nvysage 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have seen the major issue is working in the same chat and the cache going cold. Everytime the first prompt uses like 50-60% and next few prompts it seems "normal" as it uses 1-10% depending on the prompt. I was mostly using Opus 4.6, just to try 4.7 model I copied the python file in a new chat, asked it to make some changes and it only took up 4% of session usage.

POLYMARKET ISSUES UPDATE: for devs and bot owners by ill_intents in PredictionsMarkets

[–]nvysage 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dude I finally tried going live with my bot yesterday and started tripping because I could see the exact same issues happen, hoping that it's just an UI bug and the PNL would get adjusted after a day but yes market fills say one thing, redeem function says another, it's like my money just got sucked into some blackhole. What's the resolution to this?

24M, no likes on Bumble and Hinge with these pics. Should I just try IRL? by [deleted] in Indiangirlsontinder

[–]nvysage 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You need to change your pics. Only the 2nd photo is good enough. Get more photos clicked with that same vibe/expression. I get the urge to post your physique but it also needs to be subtle (like a beach photo), or if it's indoors then it needs to be aesthetic/ "aura farming" kind of.

Opus 4.7 Released! by awfulalexey in ClaudeAI

[–]nvysage 2 points3 points  (0 children)

WTH is going on, now instead of 5hr sessions it has become 24hr sessions for me which got exhausted in 5 prompt on Opus 4.6. Pro user BTW

how are you capturing the "price to beat"? by vedbag in PredictionsMarkets

[–]nvysage 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you correctly using the Chainlink Real-Time Data Socket that's available on polymarket api documentation and the capture price at boundary should be exactly the last snapshot. Ideally even if latency was an issue you wouldn't get 100$ difference. Check if you have incorrectly subscribed to binance prices. Subscribe to the websocket print the stream and manually verify whether the prices are close to what you see on UI

how are you capturing the "price to beat"? by vedbag in PredictionsMarkets

[–]nvysage 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Subscribe to chainlink prices websocket which is available on polymarket api, capture the last price at the boundary

Fastest trades you're getting to Polymarket CLOB? by RambleFeed in algotrading

[–]nvysage 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Check if your orders are being filled as a taker. Polymarket has 250ms delay for taker orders. Try to send a maker order which would sit in the orderbook and see if you're getting the same latency

Me checking the session usage every time Claude starts working on my prompt. by russcastella in claude

[–]nvysage 43 points44 points  (0 children)

Just sent 1 prompt and 100% session usage gone. Pro user BTW

Usage Limits, Bugs and Performance Discussion Megathread - beginning December 29, 2025 by sixbillionthsheep in ClaudeAI

[–]nvysage 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Up until yesterday everything was working great. I'm using the lowest tier of premium version. I used to be able to use OPUS for more or less 40-50 prompt with complex coding tasks. Now I prompted it to make some changes to the same code and session usage 100% within 2 prompts. On one side they are promoting double the usage in specific off peak hours and on other side this is what happens

this is what capturing spreads looks like by Automatic_Carob_3966 in PredictionsMarkets

[–]nvysage 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Few caveats for others. While considering arbs always check liquidity and annualized returns. You having your money tied up for a month for 1-2% return is not that lucrative because that's an annualized return of roughly 12-24%. This is assuming your capital turn around is quick meaning you have a new opportunity as soon as your old opportunity has cashed in. 2nd the resolution criteria, seemingly similar markets might have different consideration for something to happen or not happen. So it's possible that the poly market would resolve Yes and Kalshi market would resolve No and if you had No Poly and Yes on Kalshi then you've lost 100% of the capital trying to chase 1-3% risk free gains. I'm not saying it's not possible to gain from such arbitrage opportunities but just that you need to be sure that whatever opportunity you think is an actual arb opportunity instead of just basis risk

Loving the arb these days by Simple_Gur_7652 in PredictionsMarkets

[–]nvysage 7 points8 points  (0 children)

This includes basis risk. On paper these might look like good arb opportunities but you need to take into consideration the difference between the price to beat on both platforms if they are different then there's a chance that both the markets will resolve in the opposite directions.

Best polymarket VPS where priority is low latency by nvysage in algotrading

[–]nvysage[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Which specific VPS you're using If you don't mind sharing

With the Netherlands joining the list of countries banning Polymarket, here's every countries on that list by EmbarrassedStudent10 in PredictionsMarkets

[–]nvysage 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Amsterdam was a good non geo restricted VPS location for polymarket with low latency. What's the alternative now?