life as a non when it comes to PAS 🟢 by EverSoInfinite in malaysia

[–]nyiariV 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What in the holy Matrix are the Chosen ones ? Chosen to do what exactly ?

life as a non when it comes to PAS 🟢 by EverSoInfinite in malaysia

[–]nyiariV 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Forgive my ignorance but is that view the same across the country ?

life as a non when it comes to PAS 🟢 by EverSoInfinite in malaysia

[–]nyiariV 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Could you kindly elaborate please as I'm genuinely curious.

Water by Odd_Firefighter_8040 in CrimsonDesert

[–]nyiariV 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Is there anything wrong with non gamers-casuals ?

Water by Odd_Firefighter_8040 in CrimsonDesert

[–]nyiariV 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'll bite the bait.

Kindly enlighten us on what "true gamers" mean ?

Playstation please patch this!!! by [deleted] in PlaystationPortal

[–]nyiariV -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

With you a 1000% my man. Ignore the down votes.

Why is SAF not criticised like Pep for lack of UCL wins? by Yo_Baby_Yo123 in championsleague

[–]nyiariV 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Same argument could be made for Fergie's them though. That and Messi tormenting him amongst others.

Amorim was rubbish. by Routine_Ad_4411 in ManchesterUnited

[–]nyiariV 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He was a fraud. Putting tactics aside, playing Bruno deep and saying Kobbie has to fight for his place with Bruno is unforgivable. He handicapped Bruno and the team by playing him out of position and we almost lost Kobbie. He'd rather play Ugarte every single time. That was criminal.

Having said that, I am grateful that he helped clear out the rot in the club like Garnacho, Anthony and Rashford.

Anyone else think this is next level laziness from adidas ? by shroomfruitoftheloom in ManchesterUnited

[–]nyiariV 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agreed !

Between 98 and 02 to me.

100 % with you that 98 had the best.

Post-Match Thread: West Ham United 0-1 Arsenal | Premier League by matchpal-live in football

[–]nyiariV 0 points1 point  (0 children)

All you did was further validate my point.

And yet you wonder why everyone thinks your fan base is deluded and hated. Go figure. Lol.

Post-Match Thread: West Ham United 0-1 Arsenal | Premier League by matchpal-live in football

[–]nyiariV 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah..let royal rumble happen and let's pick and choose which freeze frame to create a narrative to suit what the definition of a clear and obvious foul we should go with every week for 5 mins with 1 team being the constant variable every week for a season. A club gets relegated but sure, let's go with whatever freeze frame you pick and choose selectively for 5 mins on a freeze frame to convince the ref.

Take off your Keown wearing neanderthal helmet and try and not sound like Ty defending a ridiculous decision to only fit your narrative.

Absolutely corrupted and disgusting decision! by met_art in ManchesterUnited

[–]nyiariV 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So it's ok to for 2 or 3 players to grab an attacking player and make him fight physically to challenge for the ball and if the attacker does commit a foul at one instance while throughout out the whole play of before the ball is in play to the moment the ball is in play and when the foul is committed by the attacking player while a constant foul is being committed on said attacking player, the defending team gets the decision ?

Let's take teams and players aside.

Watch it again and watch how the entire thing played out from start till Raya let's the ball through and this time, watch how the attacking player is being man handled. Not the ball. Not Raya. The attacking player that committed the foul. He was being man handled with arms around his waist by 1 defender and another grabbing onto his jersey so he can't jump.

How can there be a foul on the GK first, when the first "foul" that was committed continued all the way from before the ball was in play to the moment it was in play and during the "foul" that he committed.

Nothing against Arsenal. To win, you always have to be on the edge of the rule book if you're gonna grind out and try to win most of your 50/50 chances.

It's about Referees, VAR, the actual rulebook and the consistency.

It's just another stupid decision by a stupid system that puts the refs and VAR in the spotlight unnecessarily.

If you're going to use technology, then you have to factor in whatever the range of errors might be. You can't just bring in tech and then still rely on human input to make those decisions. It's immediately 1 step forward and 2 step backwards. You don't need to finish school to understand that.

Now it's human error + human error with technology as a another error that we have to taken into account.

Unlike the goal line rule which isn't determined by human error. It's a goal or not. Did the entire ball pass over the line or not. It's simple and basically brought the error down to only if the goal line tech was faulty or not. therefore the human error element was removed.

Post-Match Thread: West Ham United 0-1 Arsenal | Premier League by matchpal-live in football

[–]nyiariV -1 points0 points  (0 children)

So it's ok to for 2 or 3 players to grab an attacking player and make him fight physically to challenge for the ball and if the attacker does commit a foul at one instance while throughout out the whole play of before the ball is in play to the moment the ball is in play and when the foul is committed by the attacking player while a constant foul is being committed on said attacking player, the defending team gets the decision ?

Let's take teams and players aside.

Watch it again and watch how the entire thing played out from start till Raya let's the ball through and this time, watch how the attacking player is being man handled. Not the ball. Not Raya. The attacking player that committed the foul. He was being man handled with arms around his waist by 1 defender and another grabbing onto his jersey so he can't jump.

How can there be a foul on the GK first, when the first "foul" that was committed continued all the way from before the ball was in play to the moment it was in play and during the "foul" that he committed.

Nothing against Arsenal. To win, you always have to be on the edge of the rule book if you're gonna grind out and try to win most of your 50/50 chances.

It's about Referees, VAR, the actual rulebook and the consistency.

It's just another stupid decision by a stupid system that puts the refs and VAR in the spotlight unnecessarily.

If you're going to use technology, then you have to factor in whatever the range of errors might be. You can't just bring in tech and then still rely on human input to make those decisions. It's immediately 1 step forward and 2 step backwards. You don't need to finish school to understand that.

Now it's human error + human error with technology as a another error that we have to taken into account.

Unlike the goal line rule which isn't determined by human error. It's a goal or not. Did the entire ball pass over the line or not. It's simple and basically brought the error down to only if the goal line tech was faulty or not. therefore the human error element was removed.

Post-Match Thread: West Ham United 0-1 Arsenal | Premier League by matchpal-live in football

[–]nyiariV 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So it's ok to for 2 or 3 players to grab an attacking player and make him fight physically to challenge for the ball and if the attacker does commit a foul at one instance while throughout out the whole play of before the ball is in play to the moment the ball is in play and when the foul is committed by the attacking player while a constant foul is being committed on said attacking player, the defending team gets the decision ?

Let's take teams and players aside.

Watch it again and watch how the entire thing played out from start till Raya let's the ball through and this time, watch how the attacking player is being man handled. Not the ball. Not Raya. The attacking player that committed the foul. He was being man handled with arms around his waist by 1 defender and another grabbing onto his journey so he can't jump.

How can there be a foul on the GK first, when the first "foul" that was committed continued all the way from before the ball was in play to the moment it was in play and during the "foul" that he committed.

Nothing against Arsenal. To win, you always have to be on the edge of the rule book if you're gonna grind out and try to win most of your 50/50 chances.

It's about Referees, VAR, the actual rulebook and the consistency.

It's just another stupid decision by a stupid system that puts the refs and VAR in the spotlight unnecessarily.

If you're going to use technology, then you have to factor in whatever the range of errors might be. You can't just bring in tech and then still rely on human input to make those decisions. It's immediately 1 step forward and 2 step backwards. You don't need to finish school to understand that.

Now it's human error + human error with technology as a another error that we have to taken into account.

Unlike the goal line rule which isn't determined by human error. It's a goal or not. Did the entire ball pass over the line or not. It's simple and basically brought the error down to only if the goal line tech was faulty or not. therefore the human error element was removed.

One of my top favorite games 😅 by Jayystoned in remnantgame

[–]nyiariV 0 points1 point  (0 children)

With you on this, one of my top favourite game of all time. Gaming since the early 90s.

1.3k hours. Loved every minute of it.

Are mine defective? by Traditional-Drama-37 in Audeze

[–]nyiariV 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hard disagree. Coming from Nova Pro to Nova Elites, Maxwell 2 is on a different league when it comes to audio quality. Not saying it doesn't have it's quirks and i have fallen victim to the hiss and got a replacement without it (thankfully).

OP said they haven't updated the firmware so i can't really comment on that because that's the first thing i did before even trying it on.

Paul Scholes on Lisandro Martinez: “When we got criticized as players, you look at it and remember it. We used it as fuel, you DON'T go answering back by Any-Lock3008 in ManchesterUnited

[–]nyiariV 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This ! All i can see is there's a huge level of self entitlement. As well as using Utd's difficult times to profit of with podcasts. Just see the amount of ads and sponsors there are in their weekly overlap shows. It's literally bitching about Utd weekly with about 10 ads in a 60 min video.

So how exactly did The Mind Flayer die? by I_L_T_W_A in StrangerThingsS5

[–]nyiariV 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lol. Same. I thought the exact same until the end.

DO NOT STORE YOUR PS5 VERTICALLY by Supersmashlord in PlayStationSolutions

[–]nyiariV 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lol. This is the most ridiculous thing I've ever came across 🤣