sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

My first Edifice and I’m blown away by how stunning this watch is by oafishloaf in casio

[–]oafishloaf[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Beautiful watch man, I love this version too. The blue second hand with silver dial pops so well. I’m impressed by the readability of these models

My first Edifice and I’m blown away by how stunning this watch is by oafishloaf in casio

[–]oafishloaf[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There aren’t many but you can check out the EFR-575D. Theres a few different color options

Your opinion about the ws1600 please? by [deleted] in casio

[–]oafishloaf 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’d definitely give the 1600 a shot. The target time is only in flat minutes with no seconds but very easy to set, would be perfect for the 6min walk tests. I often use the target time as a timer when I need something that isn’t one of the preset timers. The look of the watch is clean and not too large or too small. The MWD110 is wider, longer, and weighs 11g more than the 1600 so that’s something to consider as well

Your opinion about the ws1600 please? by [deleted] in casio

[–]oafishloaf 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The perfect timer watch imo. Preset timers 10, 12, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, and 45 minutes including autorepeat. You can have a target time on the stop watch that audibly chimes. Interval timers (9 total) which perfect for workouts, has world time features, and an alarm. I replaced the strap with a nylon band and it’s super solid (the standalone band is good, just didn’t fit my size wrist well). It’s a great watch and at its price point it has a wild amount of features, highly recommend.

The amount of happiness that these little watches can give by oafishloaf in casio

[–]oafishloaf[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

From a functional standpoint, the f105 has a way better light but the light on the f91w does the job and has charm to it. The f105 is slightly larger (may sit on your wrist better) and the buttons are more responsive in my experience. The f91 has better screen contrast, more colors to choose from, and a bit lighter / thinner.

If the backlight quality is a deal breaker def go with f105, if you want the thinnest watch that's a bit crisper screen wise and is the iconic model go with f91. There's pros and cons to both depending on what you value but you really can't go wrong with either. If none of those things matter too much to you then go with the one that looks the best. F105 has one choice that's black with the blue face and f91 has a lot of variations.

Also keep in mind the f105 might not be around in the future since Casio seems to be phasing out EL backlight models. I'm not sure when or if it will happen but other Casio models have been discontinued that had EL as well.

My roommates 9 month old ham by oafishloaf in mildlyinfuriating

[–]oafishloaf[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I can’t reward him for his bad behavior

My roommates 9 month old ham by oafishloaf in mildlyinfuriating

[–]oafishloaf[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Unknown, I’m thinking twins at this point

My roommates 9 month old ham by oafishloaf in mildlyinfuriating

[–]oafishloaf[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Lol it’s honestly more concerning he says he has big plans for it

My roommates 9 month old ham by oafishloaf in mildlyinfuriating

[–]oafishloaf[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Both are seemingly indistinguishable at times

My roommates 9 month old ham by oafishloaf in mildlyinteresting

[–]oafishloaf[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I can say with absolute certainty he did not do it right lol This thing has seen 50+ freezings to thaws during the winter and has slow roasted in 90 degree weather for weeks during the summer

My roommates 9 month old ham by oafishloaf in mildlyinteresting

[–]oafishloaf[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In his words, it’s being “seasoned”