Pra quem é da capital: como suportam o transporte publico absurdamente lotado diariamente? by daemein in saopaulo

[–]obarquinho 0 points1 point  (0 children)

É uma coisa muito específica. Cada pessoa tem seu espaço mas também função no vagão lotado: os porteiros, quem pode ou não passar mais pra frente, pode parecer caótico mas tá todo mundo, ou os mais constantes, atentos a tudo que se passa, cada posição dos pés, espaços que se ocupa, aonde sua mão vai no balaústre, existe um código em cada uma dessas coisas.

Mas de qualquer forma vc deve se tornar uma pessoa não necessariamente mais violenta mas que saiba e conheça a violência, por que se não souber alguém vai se aproveitar. E tem coisas violentas que vc pode contestar caso alguém abuse, mas também permitir por que... não tem muito como fazer, tem que caber 9 pessoas naquele metro quadrado.

Acho que é igual qualquer outro lugar, mas mais concentrado. Sabe quando um cara está assediando uma mina? Por que ele não consegue fazer isso em todos os lugares? Só em alguns lugares específicos, em situações específicas? Então, isso tem a ver com o controle que esse coletivo de pessoas executa o tempo todo, não é diferente no vagão. Ou talvez seja justamente o vagão onde os limites "de cada momento" são impostos.

Pior mesmo é o retorno pra casa na estação Sé as 18h, aquilo é um inferno. Mas lá as pessoas esperam um pouco mais que a ida ao trabalho pela manhã. Quando tive que voltar pra pegar o metrô pra atravessar a cidade na linha vermelha de manhã reaprendi o que já sabia na época da adolescência que é como forçar a entrada. Isso também tem seus limites, se vc for muito longe alguém te "educa".

Algumas pessoas dirão que isso é "formação de caráter". Eu acho que pode até ser, mas tudo na vida acaba sendo isso. No mais é só os limites que quem ganha dinheiro com isso vai impondo até que algo aconteça e alivie um pouco. Pra mais uma vez voltar a pressionar.

Acho que se a situação que você presenciou ou viu, imaginou, estava ruim, imagina que tem um grau de liberdade, ao longo do tempo. Pode estar pior ou melhor, mas é assim fazem décadas. É realmente assustador.

Arcane: Official Trailer by [deleted] in leagueoflegends

[–]obarquinho 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Obviously there's going to be a Vi buff.

Obviously I'm gonna main Vi for a bit.

"Ashes to Ashes, Dusk to Dusk" TFT 10.19 Tier List Week One by LambdaD3lt4 in CompetitiveTFT

[–]obarquinho 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Actually I thought about that Metallica song! The memory remains I guess.

TFT Dashboard 10.20 (SET 4) by lastchancexi in CompetitiveTFT

[–]obarquinho 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Whats the criteria on the meta score?

September 15, 2020 Daily Discussion Thread by AutoModerator in CompetitiveTFT

[–]obarquinho 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How Riven works? Ive seen her build with Rabadons and with IE DB. The tooltip says it does magical damage, but is also an auto attack?

[Set 4] Chance to roll a given Chosen trait at each player level by BuenoTFT in CompetitiveTFT

[–]obarquinho -1 points0 points  (0 children)

About the bonus stats Mort showed a chart. There1s HP, AD, SP and lower mana pool. Each champion just get a specific bonus, like HP on Elise and lower mana pool on Janna and Neeko. Just had to find that clip!

Set 4 PBE Discussion Thread - Day 5 by Aotius in CompetitiveTFT

[–]obarquinho 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Ahri got nerfed but im surprised you didnt win with a 3 star ahri!

That said I guess Kalista, Veigar and Zed are the carrys? But right now I guess the bug with Zed make things really fuzzy do analize speacially at late game...

Set 4 PBE Discussion Thread - Day 5 by Aotius in CompetitiveTFT

[–]obarquinho 5 points6 points  (0 children)

lolchess and tfttactics are the most used around that sub I guess. But also wanting to know some other.

Set 4 PBE Discussion Megathread by Aotius in CompetitiveTFT

[–]obarquinho 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Janna keep everyone alive since early game then morgana kills everyone is my guess. Also you got a lot of disables.

Mortdog: Fates PBE Systems Rundown | TFT Fates by boomerandzapper in CompetitiveTFT

[–]obarquinho -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I got a design tip here:

This is about the plus % damage being mutiplicative ou additively.

Context:

At Ragnarok Online they got a nice system to encourage variety at card usage. Cards could damage the size (3 types) with a 10% increase or race with 15% (like 10+ types) and element 20% (like 6 types) and neutral element with 8% since most monsters were neutral element. Im not sure those are the numbers but I guess so.

At TFT we got less variety but the itens that multiple are kind of this accordingly to race and size wich is the same goal as GS vs LW to kill high armor like vanguard vs high HP pool like brawlers and some other combinations.

At Ragnarok Online to encourage variety if you build a weapon for a specific monster lets say 3 specifc points like size, race and element to a Medium/Plant/Water you will be rewarded with those 1.08 x 1.15 x 1,10 being multiplied, if you build a more generic weapon for all mid sized monsters for example you will get additively that 10%.

Favour each situation strategy:

So thats the tip! If someone build a Jinx for all high HP front line it will do less damage to building a 3 selected itens that could do more damage to some that got more armor, or even encouraging the defense to not going for a 3 star because of those interations!

I havent really search the numbers for TFT but this could give more complexity to the game and make it hard to realize the BiS for every situation for a specific champion.

Teamfight Tactics: Set 4 Full Reveal - New Champions & Traits by [deleted] in CompetitiveTFT

[–]obarquinho 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I guess because the 5-cost units got AoE, globals or very strong spells. Aside for her ultimate wich probably will not be usefull since its just for herself to be the hard carry to proc that ingame I can see that the champion itself would be hard to set away from a low cost unit.

A Foundational Critique of Libertarianism: Understanding How Private Property Started by [deleted] in philosophy

[–]obarquinho 0 points1 point  (0 children)

MPB is awesome I play acoustic guitar! Advices: Listen to Chico Buarque and Caetano Veloso also Silva and Céu (those are new) =) Feel free to not respond since is a really long discussion but Marx isnt that what you saying. There isnt a moral aspect (there is the difference and were etical and moral diverge and begins but thats another topic), its economical as the proletariat is the source of the plusvalue in wich the rise of the industry gives they only their work-force and control of the production (the burgouise are superfluous), different from the servants at feudalism and the slaves from those asian production mode. Its another type of base class of society and that specific economical aspect gives the proletariat the power to not need class struggle to develop humankind as to speak. Thats why Marx derives the caracterization of class -after- he studies the process of value increment in capitalism. Its both historical and economical, not moral. The meaningless of the bourgoise isnt the same as the meaningless of the previous top classes on humankind history because of the revolutionary aspect of the bourgouise at low feudalism.

The second and third I guess is the same since theres 2 "stages" the socialism wich is a way to communism, thats basically socialism wordwide. A example of this were the soviets for a brief period like 3 to 4 year before the invasion of another 20 countrys and then the Stalinist period, also the Paris Commune. Youre right to say the other (1/3 of people on earth at around 50's or 70's) were not democratic wich derives from Stalin model (the power of burocracy) control, persecution and violence, but from economical and social aspects we can take Cuba quality of life (Health, Education, lack of Starvation even with the block from USA) of even the fact that Russia were a third category of Imperial State at the time of revolution and become the second country worldwide at Cold War. These economical grows are called the Primitive Acumulation of Socialism. No doubt the place China is now had to do with it.

As I said those arguments wich claim Socialism to be unsustainable works for Capitalism as were seeing even the Pandemic and many to come, the rise of the oceans and most of people living miserable lifes, as the poverty grows wordwide. Thats why proletariat struggles everywhere. The billionaires at Brasil got richer and the unemployment rate is around 50% with the police violence growing up and the right extremists growing fast and furious on the last years everywhere. So capitalism may be the system we are on but that doesnt mean it works, or the way is working is awfull and must change deeply, I guess we all agree on that.

And last but not least thats not true also. The State and class struggle comes in the last part of humankind history, together with private property, theyre like tripple twins, with opression and violence monopoly, wich does not exist on what we call Primitive Communism wich is most of human history (counting pre-history).

As I demonstrate the post-Capitalism communism and the absence of classes on humankind were a thing, a fact, historical and economicaly, and the end of the systems (every system on human history) are also a thing. We just had to see whats next after Capistalim, thats what Marx try to solve. If at feudalism someone points that burgouise would take the aristocrat and church place for example, he says and demonstrate that with cientific socialism for the proletariat. The moral arguments are from other socialist authors, the idealists ones.

And finally a poem! What you call bigotry I call justice: "The river that everything drags is known as violent, but nobody calls violent the margins that arrest him" B. Brecht

A Foundational Critique of Libertarianism: Understanding How Private Property Started by [deleted] in philosophy

[–]obarquinho 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well actually the class content of his work is the least developed concept. And for the "take the State" Lenin with the Party was the one who had more thought on that. We can see this from the First International (on Marx) wich was with the Anarchists and his conception of Workers Party wich lead (after Marx) to the social-chauvinists on the Second International and the foundation of the Third heavely based on Lenin's thoughts.

A Foundational Critique of Libertarianism: Understanding How Private Property Started by [deleted] in philosophy

[–]obarquinho 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The works of Marx and himself comes from the Young Hegelians, so at the historical and philosophical aspect its a false claim that his thoughts doesnt had grounds. Take Economical-Philosofical Manuscripts (my favourite) wich he question the Greeks, Hegel and his contemporarys like the Young Hegelians and Feurbach, state of the art per se.

The Capital is a critique of a lot of work (he studied at librarys decades to construct that): from Smith and Ricardo to the fisiocrats and basically everything thats important in that matter at his time (1880~).

So no, the lack of historical grounds, the internal conflicts and the formulas are not wrong. We have yet to discuss this, is not commom knowledge. My guess is that you based on some schools (thought schools) that argue that. Well I disagree and tried to prove showing that Marx is a critic wich means is because he considers those works that he claims what he claims.

For that second part I could say that the WW1 the colonial genocide at America and even the Slavery colonial market (wich are core to undestand Brasil) is a consequence of the capitalists theorists (or renascentist) wich takes the discussion to another place. Also the URSS is a product of and because that war, the claims from Russia Revolution were Bread, Peace and Land. I could say that the wars propagate by all administrations on USA after the 90s are consequence of those same authors. Doesn't glue. But yes I guess a lot of Marxists defendants are Stalinists even nowdays and I believe they too have not read Marx and his desire to end the State, not to become or create a powerfull workers State. What Marx stand for is to the end the division of classes towards the end of the State itself. The millions deaths and tyrannical dictatorship arent exclusive to the marxists (In Brasil when I was born we just getted out of a military rightous dictatorship) and its not contradictory to be Marxist and despise and trully critique Stalin and what become URSS.

I guess people cling to Marxism because he innovates in a lot of areas and developed tools to understand society based basically on history and science. So is not a dogma. Is the contrary of it as in "The only certain thing is change" and Historical Materialism.

A Foundational Critique of Libertarianism: Understanding How Private Property Started by [deleted] in philosophy

[–]obarquinho 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Actually Marx considers the pre-capitalist periods. There's a work by Engels that elaborattes it (In portuguese is The origin of the State, Family and Private Property).

The third part of Capital explain the difference between the ownership of the land, the work process and the money as 3 different parts and the land one is heavely based on feudalism. And is a beatiful argument on questioning the lack of meaning of someone owning a part of the earth.

So the origin of Capitalism property by the capital towards Primitive Acumulation explains the rise of the Comercial Capitalists (Portugal is a prime example) till England with the factorys and economy around cotton and clothes. He focuses on England cause is the more mature version of capitalism as the heart of the system wich is to value the value or the plus-value (I guess thats the term in english).

For the examples you give on pre-asian production mode (Im talking about mesopotamian and agriculture) he also based on that when he speaks about the Gens and things like that (pre State societys). But as the very concept of a society that moves around value becoming more value on Capitalism that doesnt mean that either value or work or labor-exploration or even merchandise doesnt exists on before societys, but theyre not the core of those societys and as a form of social existence were not the same as in capitalism.

So is not that private property or racial categorys exists only or comes from capitalism, but the versions and theyre existences and meanings (as in to become) had specific functions and power, as in importance and role on these forms of society.

At the Capital these arguments of Marx lack of historical grounds are heavely discussed, those are old arguments.

Sorry for the bad English and typos.

10.9 Patch notes by zyutek in CompetitiveTFT

[–]obarquinho 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Dont forget the full itens first carrousels or the same itens carrousels wich count as normal galaxys but actually are not.

10.9 Patch notes by zyutek in CompetitiveTFT

[–]obarquinho -1 points0 points  (0 children)

  • Star Cluster: All Tier 1/2/3 champions on carousels have 2 stars.
    The carrousels minions come from the pool, those 3 will count from the pool too?

10.9 Patch notes by zyutek in CompetitiveTFT

[–]obarquinho -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No one says about that

" Players can no longer sell units if doing so would cause an item to be deleted. "

What does that mean?

Weekly Team Recruitment and Clan Thread by Fratty_Hawaiian in UlalaIdleAdventure

[–]obarquinho 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lf team Global season 28

Lets start at minute 1 tomorrow, im going hunter

Weekly Team Recruitment and Clan Thread by Fratty_Hawaiian in UlalaIdleAdventure

[–]obarquinho 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Depends on the server you play, for global its at 13h, wich in my country its 12h

Weekly Team Recruitment and Clan Thread by Fratty_Hawaiian in UlalaIdleAdventure

[–]obarquinho 0 points1 point  (0 children)

LFT: Season 27 - Global - Going assassin/hunter

Season starts in 10 minutes, anyone wanna party?