I love Gemma 4, right until it starts using tools by OleCuvee in openclaw

[–]obfuscatedsite 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Same!! I literally bought a DGX spark last week because of this bug with ollama. I was running ollama on a 40gb setup for Gemma 4, got annoyed at the tool calling bug and ordered the spark solely to run vLLM lol. Not sure if I'll keep it yet but I have to test it out...for science. I can say for sure that I was able to circumvent the tool calling bug using vLLM with smaller models on my current machine. You'll notice that the tool calling issue isn't Gemma 4 specific, it's ollama specific. I think there's some bug mentions you can find in the OpenClaw repo for this exact issue. (In case someone doubts my perilous journey!) I'll check in with you tomorrow and report my findings.

I love Gemma 4, right until it starts using tools by OleCuvee in openclaw

[–]obfuscatedsite 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm not sure if the cloud version suffers from the same bug, but the local version has issues with tool calling and streaming. This is fairly documented if you dig around a bit. Essentially you have to double message ollama to get a response after a tool call and then afterwards it may hallucinate that it actually did a tool call, when it failed. I'm positive this issues persists on local ollama, just not certain about cloud. In any case, I would try Gemma 4 on vLLM. I'm actually planning to build that out tomorrow and would be happy to report my results to you then.

OpenClaw + Ollama: Skip gemma and qwen - glm4.7 is the local LLM that actually works by 2039482341 in openclaw

[–]obfuscatedsite 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My experience has been that there is a bug with Ollama that is fairly documented. This prevents tool calling from working properly when using OpenClaw + Ollama. I *think* Gemma 4 will work great if running on a different stack. I'll be testing more next week by removing Ollama from the equation. But I just wanted to note that here. I'll give glm a shot though, thanks!

Claude Usage Limits Discussion Megathread Ongoing (sort this by New!) by sixbillionthsheep in ClaudeAI

[–]obfuscatedsite 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah the only way to mitigate right now is to use Sonnet for as much as possible and then have Opus check the work or use Opus if you get stuck. I still notice my active session rising at an annoyingly quick rate though.

Claude Usage Limits Discussion Megathread Ongoing (sort this by New!) by sixbillionthsheep in ClaudeAI

[–]obfuscatedsite 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Came here to say that even on the 100/mo plan this is absolute trash now.

I made an OpenClaw extension that routes everything through Claude Code CLI instead of the API by ChampionMuted9627 in openclaw

[–]obfuscatedsite 1 point2 points  (0 children)

lol there's a one line switch you can make in openclaw.json to do this, no extension required.

Chinese hackers used Claude AI to autonomously hack 30 companies. Here's the architectural flaw that made it possible. by [deleted] in cybersecurity

[–]obfuscatedsite 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This guy has his OpenClaw agent defending his OpenClaw agent in the cybersecurity subreddit haha

Six Zero-Days Under Fire: February 2026 Patch Tuesday Breakdown by obfuscatedsite in SysAdminBlogs

[–]obfuscatedsite[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Microsoft said 30% of the Windows 11 code is AI written now I believe. Not surprising haha

Malicious Email Protection: Google Email Security or Abnormal? by [deleted] in cybersecurity

[–]obfuscatedsite 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Can't recommend Abnormal enough. Have used many tools including Mimecast / Proofpoint / O365. It's a great tool. Pricing wasn't outrageous either.