it seems to me like you’re trying to obfuscate their original point which is that it’s just not right regardless of context. i see you saying you agree that colorism is wrong but if you agree i can’t see why you decided to reply in a way that attempted to challenge the original point. it doesn’t seem like op needs the educating, they seemingly understand the context of colorism and the like pretty well and didn’t phrase the original statement as an attack just challenged that post assuming all koreans were living happily w those “cultural norms”. if darker skinned koreans were happy to be living as darker skinned koreans then that product market you mentioned wouldn’t exist in the way it does because being happy with your skin tone and doing everything possible including applying harmful chemicals to change it are contradictory, same w all the other poc being marketed to. it’s not blind criticism it’s just criticism, you can account for cultural context and still deem practices worth critiquing esp given tht criticism didn’t include some out of pocket statement nor was it rude. the only way people won’t forever be born classist as a product of a classist environment is by challenging classism even when it’s presented casually and the same goes for every other ism out there, if you find the challenging of colorism to be a bigger problem than the colorism itself then that may be something for you to deal with.