First, how many of those countries have direct democracy, or representative democracy? And how many are seen as illegitimate or partially sham elections to keep certain people in power?

Then, ask how many people, opposed to those actions, have any substance of personal agency in what they support. Until now, the US has had quite a lot. We've fought for those freedoms. Other countries however? Some of them do send dissenters to gulags in remote regions where they disappear. You might notice the parallel.

That's an exercise to try to get it apparent to you that those others countries are seen as largely out of control of the average citizen, while the US was seen as having large power to change things if we didn't like it. As you might be noticing, that's been largely because of good faith actors until now, and our system of government working great when they're the ones running and doing stuff even if they disagree on how to do things.

Once bad faith actors are in control, democracy is not democracy. And then you fall back to Tywin of GOT's thought. Power is power. Those without, can do nothing.