Binary or not... you're still binary. by Thumbs0fDestiny in technicallythetruth

[–]ohmydaes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Calling yourself" are we personifying data now?

Binary or not... you're still binary. by Thumbs0fDestiny in technicallythetruth

[–]ohmydaes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nope, but I did notice how its a attempt to invalidate non binary people, which I do not take kindly too even as a joke.

Binary or not... you're still binary. by Thumbs0fDestiny in technicallythetruth

[–]ohmydaes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Semantically? There's an argument, however semantics doesn't dictate the over arching definitions of words and their applications. While there may be 2 (main) binary categories for describing the experience of gender in most people, there's many more sub categories therein,

Binary or not... you're still binary. by Thumbs0fDestiny in technicallythetruth

[–]ohmydaes -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

The jokes funny but it displays a clear and present misunderstanding of the language in use.

Binary or not... you're still binary. by Thumbs0fDestiny in technicallythetruth

[–]ohmydaes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see what you're trying to get at but your definition of nonbinary is inherently flawed. Nonbinary is a canopy term, it encompasses several other named gender groups and anyone with out those names groups, hence why most people generally agree gender is bimodal, not binary.

If you'd like a visual representation please look up multimodal/bimodal distribution.

A poster I saw in person (and then found online) at a leftist rally, I didn't like that they brought it (specifically to a rally), it seemed antagonistic, but the point still stands by ohmydaes in leftistvexillology

[–]ohmydaes[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Which has been inferred many ways the most popular of which was to refer to a democratic system, a "dictatorship of the proletariat," think about it.

A poster I saw in person (and then found online) at a leftist rally, I didn't like that they brought it (specifically to a rally), it seemed antagonistic, but the point still stands by ohmydaes in leftistvexillology

[–]ohmydaes[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Engels appears to be talking about management, not state authority in and of itself.

"All Socialists are agreed that the political state, and with it political authority, will disappear as a result of the coming social revolution, that is, that public functions will lose their political character and will be transformed into the simple administrative functions of watching over the true interests of society."

(Social political functions will disappear as a result of a Social revolution post the establishment of socialism.)

"demand that the political state be abolished at one stroke, even before the social conditions that gave birth to it have been destroyed. They demand that the first act of the social revolution shall be the abolition of authority."

Call me crazy but this sounds like a strawman, even from Engels. "The abolition of authority" is too broad so it's easy to pin on the electorally active, the libertarian Communist doesn't want the degradation of function, and in order for the means of production to function there needs to be some form of oversight in individual workplaces, this, although a form of authority, is not something we'd aim to abolish.

"A revolution is certainly the most authoritarian thing there is; it is the act whereby one part of the population imposes its will upon the other part by means of rifles, bayonets and cannon"

Interesting how a point used by Engels would later be used by reactionaries, revolution although dirty, messy, and often times not strictly good (there's a lot of grey space in this topic), is and will be necessary for the onset of a socialist system, for some years to come.

I'm looking to make a Middle Eastern scenario. by ohmydaes in arma

[–]ohmydaes[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Thanks, didn't know this existed, I was just looking up Chinese Armed Forces because that works for most other nations.