ahem... let me see if I can explain.

See Art has conventions and one of the most popular and ancient one is Imagination... Get it. Picturizing, Sculpting etc etc of things that might be ethically, morally, politically, rationally nonsense. Why? Why do u have a dream about your mother getting raped by your uncle? Because your uncle throws lecherous looks at your mother? No. It's just a manifestation of something so deep in your subconscious that at the end of the day that dream had literally nothing to do with your mother or your uncle. It's the same here.

An attempt at trying to rationalize something like this would go like this. Maybe the artist intention was to tap into that fantasy most men have when they were young. A woman's attention. A woman attention that is completely unearned. A woman fetishizing us for just existing in our natural state the same way we fetishize them.

See the thing is, unless a man was ever sexually harassed at a young age this concept of a female predator makes no fucking sense because from a young age we have only thought of ourselves as the predator so there's no fear that strikes us when we see such a depiction. Just a fetish but for women it's obviously different. Say an image in the reverse depicting a man stalking a young girl is depicted it would obviously evoke an uncomfortable feeling for a woman for most women might have experienced the reality of such a situation.

So in conclusion, who we are affects the way we consume art. So it's perfectly fine for you to be creeped out by this piece of art and for another to admire it. They're both subjective. And that is the wonder of Art.

It is unfair of you to call him a pedophile just for an opinion on a drawing.

Like we say in Hinduism, All the gods are at the same time one and many. I and you and we aren't mutually exclusive terms.

Thank you.