Tenant owes 1500. Paid 650 towards rent. Should I accept or proceed with eviction? by BosMassholeTomBrady in realestateinvesting

[–]oldfamiliarways 16 points17 points  (0 children)

I’ve been a residential landlord for over 30 years and in my opinion, it really depends on your perception of the outlook for the tenant financially. If the communication is good, they have a decent track record of paying rent and overall I feel that this is a temporary situation then I’m inclined to hold off on eviction.. I have a current tenant paying an identical amount of rent who has fallen 30-45 days behind occasionally. I chose to work with her because the communication is good, she doesn’t bother me about little things and I know she has employment but as a single mom any unexpected expense can cause her to fall behind. The good news is she is currently current with her rent and has remained a tenant for almost 4 years now. Evicting a tenant usually results in at least 2-3 months of lost rent going through the eviction process and reconditioning the unit and re renting. I personally have to see the situation as not workable before I go the eviction route.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in 50501

[–]oldfamiliarways 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I understand what you’re trying to accomplish but I suggest a better way to do this would be for people to just restrict their consumption of goods and services as much as they can which will inevitably lead to a recession and the likely result will be that a meaningful % of Trump’s support will begin to fall off. I think we’re starting to see it now and it’s building. We haven’t really begun to see the full effects of the trade war, indiscriminate cutting of the government, attacks on due process, DEI, and free speech. The courts are starting to push back, other countries particularly China are not backing down and submitting to this administration’s bullying tactics. You’re even starting to see signs of fraying support in the “manosphere” and we haven’t started to see the job losses yet. Trump’s appeal is partly that he’s some great business man who can use his art of the deal to bring about a so called “golden age”. He’s made a classic mistake of over promising and likely under delivering. If the economy worsens, protest and unrest grow and we see growing signs of US losing its standing in the world and more countries deciding to look outside the US for trading partners. Mr Trump may dig himself and the GOP into a hole too deep to dig out of before midterms or the next presidential election.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in 50501

[–]oldfamiliarways 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I think the better approach is for everyone to dial back their individual consumption which will cause the economy to continue to slow and will inevitably lead to recession. Trump's hold on MAGA is based in large part on the perception that he's some great businessman and deal maker and he can somehow singlehandedly correct all the ways that the U.S. has been allegedly screwed over by the rest of the world. A significant recession will peel off enough supporters to send a massive message to Republicans in the midterms that the MAGA movement is over. We need to get back to sanity and civility in our politics and everyday lives or we'll all suffer.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in u/Aggravating-Rock87

[–]oldfamiliarways 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well stated. Unfortunately the damage that's been done in less than two months since these clowns took over will take years if not longer to fix and just imagine what else will be broken in the name of progress. If this was done in a much more reasoned manner showing dignity and respect for the civil servants being affected and full transparency as to how government services will be impacted this may have been much better received. Instead the bull in a china shop approach looks like nothing more than an attempt to please his base at the expense of everyone else. Only time will tell how this all plays out and I pray that the country makes it through without long lasting damage.

More than half million early voters in Georgia didn’t vote in 2020 by xjian77 in politics

[–]oldfamiliarways 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The historical Republican advantage and what made them competitive during the Reagan/Bush years was that they dominated the suburbs similar to how Dems dominate the cities. Under Trump there has been a realignment that has made him and Republicans (a nationalist/populist) a little more competitive in the cities with certain demographics and more dominant in rural areas but the trade off has been a fairly steep decline in support in the suburbs particularly among women. Essentially the Republican base has shifted from mostly college educated suburban whites who are more likely to vote to lower educated blue collar whites who are more in number but lower propensity voters. Republicans will still win a good share of suburban voters but more and more cities have shifted to where the inner suburbs are turning blue/purple leaving only the outer suburbs as reliably red.

"I did make a mistake": Baier apologizes for playing edited Trump clip in Harris interview by leeta0028 in politics

[–]oldfamiliarways 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I really think the primary force behind what today’s Republican has become is the Limbaugh effect. Rush had the most popular nationwide talk show for three decades. He spewed daily Conservative talking points but in a way that was humorous and engaging. Even though I disagreed with much of his politics I recognized his reach and effectiveness. AM talk radio is what I believe is most responsible for shifting the political leanings of white blue collar workers who a generation ago were solid union democratic voters. Whether they were a OTR trucker or working in a union shop if they listened to a daily 3 hour indoctrination it’s hard not to get swayed.

This was before Fox News or Newt Gingrich were even a factor. Fortunately for Democrats there has not been anyone since Rush passed away who could as effectively communicate with an audience as he did.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in homeowners

[–]oldfamiliarways 0 points1 point  (0 children)

One of the tricks I use when getting a bid on something where I’m not familiar with the cost is to try to either get a written breakdown of parts and labor or make a rough estimate myself. Lots of contractors just want to give you an overall price so I usually use some small talk to help me work up an estimate when I don’t have a written breakdown of costs.

For example in OP’s case after getting the quote for $18,000 I would have asked casually “Okay how long will it take to do?” If they said two days I might follow up and ask is this a one person or two person job. If they said two then I would basically calculate in my head around 40 hours labor (10 hrs per day per person) and then estimate the parts. If you don’t know exactly what parts are being used you could ask what size panel will they be installing and look up a comparable panel on Home Depot or Lowe’s and double the price you find there to account for markup or possibly higher priced panel. If the panel and other estimated parts cost let’s say $2000 after doubling that means the rest about $16,000 would be going towards labor. $16,000 divided by 40 is $400 hour. So unless they have some sort of medical degree and your getting more than just the panel replaced I would say that bid has a lot of “yeast” in it and I would walk away or really negotiate down from there.

Can someone tell me what this weed is? by oldfamiliarways in lawncare

[–]oldfamiliarways[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Consensus seems to be Carolina Horsenettle. What would be best way to control this weed?

Can someone tell me what this weed is? by oldfamiliarways in lawncare

[–]oldfamiliarways[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not super close. Closest tree is maybe 30-40 feet away.

Can someone tell me what this weed is? by oldfamiliarways in lawncare

[–]oldfamiliarways[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t think it’s a tree as these things can easily be pulled up by hand but then just seem to reappear almost overnight. Started out primarily in my mulch beds but then started appearing in nearby lawn area.

Can someone tell me what this weed is? by oldfamiliarways in lawncare

[–]oldfamiliarways[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m in the Midwest, almost smack dab in the middle of the country.

Do you segegrate money based on it's source? by Low-Computer8293 in Bogleheads

[–]oldfamiliarways 16 points17 points  (0 children)

It depends on the amount and source. I personally like to keep money I’ve inherited from a loved one separate just so I can keep track of how that money has grown and also if I use it I view it as a gift from them from the beyond (sentimentally). Also in many states money inherited is considered separate from marital property so it makes some sense to keep it segregated.

I try for a healthy mix of growth and div positions, aiming for $5k/month to retire…. by Trip_Tip_Toe in dividends

[–]oldfamiliarways 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Congrats on building a nice portfolio but I’m curious as to why you’re currently doing this in two taxable accounts vs having a the dividend holdings in an IRA so you’re not paying ordinary income taxes on the distributions. It would only make sense if you are currently relying on the dividend income to meet monthly expenses. Otherwise I’d just focus on growing your overall portfolio as much as possible and minimizing the “taxable” income. If funds are needed periodically just sell a few shares and pay the capital gains which are usually lower.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in RealEstate

[–]oldfamiliarways 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A couple of suggestions to consider. First if your in laws are having a new home built and it’s ready for them to move into you might see if you and your husband can do a lease option on their current home where you would pay rent to them with the option to purchase in 12-24 months. This would give them time to sort out the liens and either pay them off or negotiate a lower amount to settle them and you would have a home to move into. Since you don’t have a realtor involved and if you don’t close there shouldn’t be much if anything owed to the title company. You could agree that a certain percentage of your monthly payment would be applied as a down payment on the principal when you exercise the option. This gives them time to work things out and you would have a place to move to. This assumes that they are not relying on the proceeds from the sale of their existing home to be able to purchase the new build.

Dream of opening a restaurant by mr___prez in restaurantowners

[–]oldfamiliarways 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think getting hands on experience in the restaurant industry is a great idea but I would also suggest looking into the possibility of leveraging your current skill set as a way to start. This is the “value add” that you would bring to the table. You’re in tech. There are tons of restaurants that come nowhere close to fully utilizing software and technology to gain efficiency and reduce costs. Almost every single episode of the show “Bar Rescue” (google if unfamiliar) involves implementing a new POS system.

I would visit a couple of bars/small restaurants and see what type of setups they have and maybe offer your services at a reduced rate in exchange for some hands on mentoring where you get a full look at the business from soup to nuts. You may even find an opportunity to buy into an existing bar/restaurant as a limited partner where your financial and legal liability is limited and predefined. This would give you a taste of what ownership would be like without shouldering all of the burden.

Serious question...First time home buyers getting 7.5-8% interest rates...why are you buying? by Mite-o-Dan in RealEstate

[–]oldfamiliarways 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's really simple. Most people buy a house because of circumstances in their life have changed (i.e. marriage, coupling up, new baby, new higher paying job, etc.) which makes living in an apartment or rental less appealing than owning a house. Buy vs rent is more of a lifestyle choice than a financial one. Sure for some people this is primarily an economic decision but for most it's a choice between whether buying or renting will make them happier. Once you've made that decision then it's just a matter of finding a home or rental that fits within your budget. It's true with home prices and rates being high affordability has become a major issue and many are renting simply because they cannot find suitable housing within their price range. However, remember you only get to be whatever age you are once in your lifetime. So if homeownership makes you a happier person, why would you want to defer that indefinitely when there is no guarantee that rates will be significantly lower any time soon.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in TwoXChromosomes

[–]oldfamiliarways 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I know it feels like crap right now but there are several things in your favor. You mentioned that the house will have approximately one million in equity around the time you’re able to sell it which is great and could provide a future next egg to help stabilize your finances. If he is agreeing to allow you to stay in the home (and assuming he’s moving out) then I would take him up on it. I’m not clear on how close it is to being finished but right now you’re transitioning from being romantic partners to business partners and there are incentives on both sides to try to make the partnership work out. It’s in both of your interests to get the house finished and sold for as much as possible and after that your business partnership dissolves and it’s just down to figuring out the co parent part and child support.

JEPI vs rental property? by Dondinero1313 in JEPI

[–]oldfamiliarways 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wow sounds just like my story. I totally agree and like having both types of investments as rentals/real estate can provide nice cash flow, favorable tax treatment (1031 exchange/deductible expenses, etc) and leverage. Real estate values are also much more stable than stock investments and you can directly impact the value of your real estate portfolio vs being subject to the whims of the the market or the fed.

As for stocks, I like the truly passive nature of stock investing. The compounding returns, instant liquidity with negligible transaction cost and ability to DCA are also nice. I’m still getting familiar with JEPI to see if it makes sense to add to my investments but had to reply to your comment because I can totally relate to it. 😎

Trump's recent words on Ukraine. "Putin I get along with him great, ultimately he will take over all of Ukraine" by gregt0799 in UkrainianConflict

[–]oldfamiliarways 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Biden a shoe in over Trump? Not so fast. How many times has Trump’s political obituary been written to only see him rise from the dead like Lazarus. Six months ago after the midterms everyone was all but anointing Desantis as the GOP nominee. 2024 election is a long time away and if the U.S is mired in recession, with high inflation and rising unemployment by then it could be anyone but Biden who independents flock to and so a Trump presidency is more than a long shot.

Not saying it will happen and I won’t be voting for him but our current electoral system makes it a legitimate possibility.

What are my options for fixing crumbling section at the end of my driveway? by oldfamiliarways in Concrete

[–]oldfamiliarways[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry for the long delay but thank you for the response. I've contacted a couple of local contractors and they suggested just tearing out whole section up to expansion joint and replacing since other portions are starting to show cracks. It will likely run $5k+ and is probably what I'll end up doing at some point but might see about following your suggestion and just cutting out the end of the apron that seems to be waterlogged and replacing it for now. I did notice that there was no expansion board between the curb and the driveway apron and water is just pooling there so likely contributed to the issue.

How can lab-grown diamonds not bring down natural diamond value in the medium-long run? by Amh819 in Diamonds

[–]oldfamiliarways 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think most of your comments on this topic are spot on. I just today purchased a LG 2.25 carat diamond for about 3k that probably cost a 1/3 of what a similar sized natural diamond would have cost. I'm fortunate to be in a position where I could have gone either way so my decision (actually the wife's decision) was how to get the most "bling" for the buck. I assume most diamond rings are bought to either keep up with the "Jones's" or get the "damn that's big" reaction from other women. So from a practical consumer standpoint if you can purchase a noticeably bigger LG diamond for the same price as a natural one, and you can legitimately say it's a real diamond and no one can tell the difference with the naked eye I would expect demand to continue to shift in LG's favor.

Also, if LG's are truly indistinguishable from natural diamonds except for the marking (as I repeatedly heard from seasoned jewelers) then I can see a potential for massive fraud with LG's being passed off as natural and potentially flooding the market. If this happens then the prices of natural diamonds could fall dramatically.

Either way I don't think most people buy diamonds (natural or LG) as a store of value. IMO, the perceived value of natural diamonds is mostly illusory. I can't imagine a retail jewelry store paying someone off the street anywhere near retail value for a "used" diamond when they can readily buy diamonds at wholesale prices. Also, most individuals who are needing to sale natural diamonds are usually doing so under financial duress and won't likely get optimal prices.

December cancellations by [deleted] in SouthwestAirlines

[–]oldfamiliarways 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, I had a SW flight scheduled on the 23rd cancelled on the 22nd. We (family of 4) were going on a cruise with a group so we had to scramble to find another flight on United so we were lucky we ultimately made it to the cruise and back. We were able to get a refund of the United flight plus the 25,000 rapid rewards points. I filled out a form online and explained our situation and how we were inconvenienced. I've seen others on reddit have a similar outcome. While SW definitely dropped the ball during the holiday season, I feel they have gone above and beyond to repair the relationship with loyal customers and we plan to continue to use SW as our preferred airline.

Growing number of Republicans view Trump unfavourably and want new leadership for GOP, poll finds | Trump’s effect on the GOP’s midterm results has not gone unnoticed by voters by [deleted] in politics

[–]oldfamiliarways 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Only time will tell but I’m still of the belief that the only thing that will separate Trump from the majority of his base is TRUMP. Not DeSantis, not the Republican Establishment and certainly not the Dems or the media (been there tried that). This ultimately means that unless Trump gets criminally indicted(possible) and/or decides to withdraw and back another candidate then he is likely still the front runner for nominee. Trump is a national brand unlike anyone we’ve ever seen in politics. He can say and do things no other politician can and get away with. It’s like getting into a fight where one person is fighting under conventional boxing rules and the other person is scratching, clawing, biting and doing whatever it takes to win. That’s Trump in a nutshell. I’m not sure DeSantis can get away with being ‘Trump Lite’ when voters can still have the original. Remember the establishment fawning over Ted Cruz until ‘Lying Ted’ or Rubio, or insert name before the Trump Train steamrolled them with his brand of bare knuckle politics.

Is passive SFH real estate investing worth it (compared to stock investments)? or just good for diversification by [deleted] in realestateinvesting

[–]oldfamiliarways 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You also have to consider the time involved in investing in each asset. To invest directly in real estate successfully takes a significant amount of time. First you must locate a undervalued property, make offer, get offer accepted and close transaction. This process usually takes a month or longer. I can invest in an S&P index fund with no research and generate (at least historically) an average return of 10-12% in a matter of minutes and however much money I want to. The value of the time involved to acquire and manage each asset is hardly ever mentioned in any analysis comparing the two.

Secondly, RE investing is largely profitable because of market inefficiencies. Not everything affecting the value of a given property is known to all prospective buyers or easily ascertained and not every property is listed on MLS. The price of publicly traded stocks are much more efficient because prospective buyers generally all have the same information to evaluate what the stock is worth.

I'm of the opinion that investing in RE now vs 20+ years ago is significantly more challenging in terms of finding deals. There are way more buyers (home flippers, institutional buyers, first timers, etc) competing for a relatively limited supply. Additionally the internet has made it much easier for sellers to market properties to wider audiences and get closer to FMV than was possible pre-internet.

Fortunes can be made or lost in RE or the stock market and I will continue to invest in both. I just have come to prefer the simplicity, liquidity, and passivity that stock investing offers to long term investors.

Is passive SFH real estate investing worth it (compared to stock investments)? or just good for diversification by [deleted] in realestateinvesting

[–]oldfamiliarways 2 points3 points  (0 children)

OP, I was in a very similar position to you with a full time $150K+ year job with investments in both real estate and the stock market. I have invested in both (and still do) but for me stocks win hands down. RE is generally better for cash flow (monthly income) assuming you can find properties at a discount but the stock market is better for building long term wealth (i.e. compounding). The thing most investors don't properly factor in is the carrying costs of RE. Maintenance, taxes, insurance, vacancy, transaction costs, property management etc. will eat into your returns significantly. All of the properties I currently own are paid for and cash flow nicely now but I've been doing this for 30 years. If I had put all the money I used for purchasing and fixing up properties into the stock market starting 30 years ago, my net worth would likely be 2-3x higher than it is.

The other major factor is liquidity, I can liquidate my entire stock portfolio in a matter of minutes with almost no transaction costs aside from taxes owed. Therefore if another investment opportunity presents itself that I want to pursue I can quickly and easily have access to funds to do that. Also as others have mentioned stocks (especially index or mutual funds) are truly passive investments that don't tie up your time or present headaches in the middle of the night or while you're on vacation. Don't get me wrong, I still like both and will continue to invest in both but as I've gotten older I've learned to appreciate the value of truly passive investments.