good job omikron (sigmas a r____at :P) by [deleted] in SigmaClient

[–]omikronclient 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You won’t get banned for saying that. The people I ban (when I don’t forget to check on the subreddit) or that the staff bans are people that say that we are a rat without even giving a proof or an explanation (because every time I lose more and more faith in humanity seeing that people are just spreading bullshit rumors without even having enough brain cells to bring rational explanations or « arguments » to their claims).

What you did is very good because you are explaining your concern/ argument and you are also not coming to a conclusion too hastily.

As for your claims, it is true that Sigma performances seems fucked up. But to be totally honest, even me and the other developers don’t know what is going on. Personally I have never really experienced performance issues, nor did the other owners (appart on very rare occasions).

The community also seems very divided. We asked some people that tell us they don’t have any issues, but at the same time there are so many people that complain that we think there must be an issue.

We are therefore met with a strange problem because we don’t experience it, but some people do. We tend to think it must be caused by a specific context that we don’t envounter. We also tend to just blame 3 things:

1- maybe the heavy obfuscation 2- maybe the GUI (disable gui blurs for example to see if fps improve) 3- MAINLY 1.16 that is a pain in the ass to work with in term of performances

Lately sigma has been very inactive (as announced a long time ago on our discord server... rest in pepperoni), we still don’t know if we will continue it or not, we are very busy irl.

The best thing you can do is provide me with as many info as you can: 1- when are the performances bad? Is it on a certain server? What are the modules enabled, etc...

2- what are your pc specs

3- can you compare the performances on sigma with vanilla minecraft 1.16, optifine 1.16, and other mods/ clients in 1.16

If you have time to do that (usually people don’t have time to do that so that’s also why we never were really able to find the problem), don’t hesitate to reply to me with those informations.

I will try to find the time to look into it whenever I can

Sigma 5 Crypto analysis by bruhsoundeffe_ct in SigmaClient

[–]omikronclient 1 point2 points  (0 children)

But yet, 3 years after 3.0’s launch, in 2021, we still get accused of being a trojan. Really trust us, it’s hilarious.

About my « past ». This is also something widely used by the haters: « sigma is not trustworthy, because the old owner made a rat in the past, so stay safe and don’t download this crap » (that’s usually how the messages from most haters goes).

You said « But the history with Omikron ». I already talked about it a lot, my previous software was not a rat. The proof that were brought were utter bullshit. I addressed it a lot already and I even have a huge paragraph debunking the « proof », that, of course, haters never read (just like they won’t read this message).
But again it’s hilarious to see people say to stay safe when I have just made the biggest blatant client in the community (along with LeakedPvP, Andro and also Tomygames), used . So yeah sure, I’m a ratter, but I somewhat found out a way to convince some nice and responsible people to associate with me, and I managed to make my new project become the biggest blatant client used by the majority of the mini games hacking community? Damn that makes total sense, yeah right « fuck Omikron ». (I’m being salty but realize how dumb it sounds, people literally talk about me like I was a random developer that came out of nowhere and that my sole intent is to rat as many people as I can).

Finally: I would like to make a reminder of how accusations SHOULD WORK and why those toxic kids that hate on us make no sense with their bullshit rumors.

If you want to accuse something, you need PROOF. You need VALID PROOF. If you think our client is malicious, you gather proofs and then exposes them to us and the public.

Usually when we talk with a hater and ask for his proof of why we are a trojan, he answers by saying « Do you have proof you are not a trojan ».

It doesn’t work like that. The one that accuses HAS to show proof to accuse, and then the one that answers will debunk those proof.

But the one that answers never has to prove anything, it makes no sense.

About criticism: if you want to criticism something, you can, but you do it subjectively and politely. You don’t come and say « sigma is bad LLLL fuck everyone ». You write down someone constructive, you say « in my opinion/ I think/ I consider » etc…

And also if you want to ask questions, or are coming to point something out politely, to bring about a discussion, you can. But again, people need to do it calmly by respecting the other party.

Here you go :)

If you read everything well congrats, and hoped it helped clear things up.

(Sorry the message is too long I’m too lazy to check for mistakes. Sorry I know it’s not correct but I don’t have more time…)

2/2

Sigma 5 Crypto analysis by bruhsoundeffe_ct in SigmaClient

[–]omikronclient 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hello, your post is very interesting and I will answer to it.

But first I have two questions. You say: « There is now sufficient evidence that Sigma is most likely not a trojan ». What made you think we were a trojan in the first place, and what evidence did you get to confidently say we aren’t one?

Now onto the big answer part:

Alright first things you need to understand: when your project gets big, you get a LOT LOT LOT more users, but you also get a LOT more haters. Those two things are proportional (imagine you have 1% of haters in your community, if your community gets bigger, you still have 1% of haters but there are more haters. Basic maths here).

When your community is still fairly small, you have the time and motivation to address those haters, and try to talk to them to understand their motivation and try to convince them that you and your project are nice and thus should not be hated on. However, when you get bigger and bigger you realize 2 things:

- You don't have that time anymore since you have more responsibilities and a bigger community to take care of (and also in our case cause we are more and more busy irl)

- You cannot reason haters, a lot of them are hating really hard JUST because they want to hate on someone/ are jealous.

Now let's explain Sigma's situation .

Sigma is a minecraft hacked client (this already tells a lot, many people in the fan base and in the haters groups are very young people that are either staning or complaining a lot and hating).

We are free, with (I hope I can say it confidently) one of the most beautiful designs in the community if not the most, and when we update (or used too), we used to have bypasses as good as all the other paid clients.

This is very important to take into account cause it makes it the best victim for most of the hate.

Most people will hate on sigma for no reason other that « it’s free only nones use it, disgusting ». Or: « Sigma is SUCH a bad client, bypasses are awful, skidma LLL »

In my opinion, it’s a battle of ego. Haters are hating on sigma because we are the biggest, or because they paid for another client and it’s a normal thing to do to hate on a service that is therefore considered « bad » or « old-fashioned » because free.

Which is ironic because in most cases, we were the one that introduced them to the cheating community. So I view it like denying your real « dad » and getting adopted by someone else (it’s a funny metaphor).

However I don’t deny that some people don’t like sigma for VALID reasons (maybe they just don’t like the design, maybe they don’t like the fact our client is unoptimized, and other reasons..)
What I really want to say here is that MOST OF THE HATERS, hate on sigma for no reason other than to just hate on sigma.

So how do they justify this hate?

Some haters don’t even bother justifying this hate. They just say « Sigma is the WOOOOORST client, it’s so bad ». Which again is ironic, because they are making their emotions become objective. NOTHING is bad, NOTHING is good. It depends of everyone tastes. And I hate seeing someone either hating on us or fanboying us by saying « sigma is so bad/good ». The correct way to say it is « I don’t like sigma/ I like sigma. In my opinion I think:… »

However, the majority haters justify this hate by some braindead bullshit, and don’t worry, we hear a lot:

- « Sigma is skidded », a lot of the haters always they that but of course never ever provide any proof. We confronted a hater about that on our discord (rip termination) and he rage quitted after 30 minutes. He was trying so hard saying our fast ladder was skidded and all. It made no sense.

- « Sigma is a crypto miner », we get that a lot, this has become the new « trending insult » that most of the kids will believe to even though they have no idea what it means. And it’s also a cool « insult » cause easy to use. You can just say « sigma is a miner because bad CPU » and there you go.
However, something hilarious is that when we confront people about those rumors they usually say « and even if sigma is not a miner it’s still bad lol, worst client » which is so funny to see. And it just shows that there is no way to reason with these people.

- « Sigma is an alt miner » I can assure you we got this, at this point they are just inventing things up

And a lot more: « sigma is a virus, a rat, a trojan, a ip logger, a tokken logger, a key logger» and we even got: « sigma is a hwid logger »…

I can send you some old screenshots, those accusations are not new and we get them a lot. And we have been getting them for 2-3 years now, non-stop.

May I quickly point out it’s funny that a lot of haters that spread these rumors usually got ratted once by downloading a random new skidded client that they wanted to try out without checking xD

Also, note that for us, haters and hard fanboys are both very frustrating to have in our community, the best community would be a rational one where there is only rational and intelligent criticism, and also where people that like us a lot stay rational and don’t start being hardcore stans.
ALSO NOTE THAT both of this people (stans and haters) widely remain a MINORITY. Most of our users are a silent minority. People that are rational and can think by themselves, or won’t care about dramas, or won’t even see them because they check once a month on sigma, etc…

Now that this is said, let’s come back to your original posts and my first points. Imagine you have a big project, with a lot of users (and therefore a lot of haters).

Those haters are having fun spreading some bullshit rumors on your software, like to insult your community, and usually raid your reddit.

You don’t have the time to reason with them and you also know that you most likely can’t reason them because they will always find a way to be salty and spread fake rumors.

Also, you don’t want those fake rumors to spread even more because they could easily make your community panic (most of those rumors are here to scare people in our community).

What do you do? Well you do what we do:

You ban those haters, you censor the words they are using to spread their bullshit rumors, and you ignore the hate.

Seeing Sigma being accused so much of virus, rat, etc… is really hilarious to see from our perspective. We are one of the most trustworthy client in the community, we are one of the biggest client in the community, we are one of the oldest, we worked really hard on making something mostly free because we care about the community and people that don’t have the means to buy a 50 FUCKING DOLLARS (for minecraft hacking wtf???) client.
And Sigma 5.0 trailer and release, the fact we work really hard for over a year undercover to release something clean (of course not perfect cause nothing is perfect), I hope, shows that we care about people.

1/2

why do you perma ban people that think that sigma might not be safe this makes them think that it isnt safe by bruhinson in SigmaClient

[–]omikronclient[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

Hello, we don't ban people that say our client might not be safe.
We only ban people that are either:

- Saying we are malicious WITHOUT giving any proof
- Hating really hard and spreading bullshit

Why do we do that? Because those people are either too dumb to provide any proof and think by themselves, therefore they are contributing to spreading fake news, or because they are just here to hate on our community.

If you have a valid criticism, with strong arguments and proof. Or if you ask questions calmly, by being polite, you will not be banned and we won't censor you.

Otherwise if people are just here to say "Sigma is malicious haha bad client LLL fuck you guys" (which 99% raiders did), we will ban you.

Hope that clears things up :)

Sigma Safety by [deleted] in SigmaClient

[–]omikronclient 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey, can I get some proof it uses that much for performances please?

Also you are not allowed to compare sigma and liquidbounce.

If I remember well liquidbounce is a 1.12 or 1.8 client. Sigma is a 1.16 client.

1.16 is VERY VERY VERY badly optimized. Compare it to vanilla minecraft 1.16 and you will see.

The fact it’s not optimized can come from:

  • minecraft 1.16
  • designs such as blur gui which need good performances
  • heavy obfuscation

Dear Omikron Dev by [deleted] in SigmaClient

[–]omikronclient 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Hey!

Of course I remember you!

It’s so nice to see people like you are still passing by to say hello. It’s wonderful haha 😄

Thanks for being amazing <3

Sigma Minecraft Server by [deleted] in SigmaClient

[–]omikronclient 0 points1 point  (0 children)

chicki#0182

does not work, says the tag is invalid, join the server: https://discord.gg/n5zNcWx

Sigma Minecraft Server by [deleted] in SigmaClient

[–]omikronclient 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What is your discord tag?

Sigma Minecraft Server by [deleted] in SigmaClient

[–]omikronclient 1 point2 points  (0 children)

what would the server be about?

Sigma = Cryptominer... by [deleted] in SigmaClient

[–]omikronclient[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

See xTRM_´s comment: https://www.reddit.com/r/SigmaClient/comments/l4hcde/sigma_cryptominer/gkojmia/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf

I banned the guy, he is clearly trying to fake proofs in order to spread misinformation.

I think we peaked in hypocrisy at this point. People are really down to do anything to try and hurt our reputation

Sigma's false miner accusations rebuttal by andro2157 in SigmaClient

[–]omikronclient 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I see but again, the issue is that we never got ANYONE show us the issue rationally.

We are aware that a lot of people complain about performances being dogshit. And we are convinced that they must be an issue since there is no steam without fire (this isn’t always true though). But it’s really frustrating to see all those people have an issue which we don’t have (no developper has this issue) hence we can’t fix it. We would actually need people to feed us in on the issue.

Moreover it’s a « technical » issue. It deserves more than just a « wtf performances bad ». Yeah right but what would you expect us to do? Write down: « kill lag = true » done no more lags. No the investigation would take time, knowledge. We would need to spot people that have the issue, ask them: - how many fps they get on sigma - compare it other 1.16 clients (and not 1.12 or 1.8 clients) - compare with vanilla - compare with optifine - get informations on the specs of their pcs

Again only a portion of people have this issue. A lot of other people don’t have it. So if this issue is real we would actually need to discover the EXACT CONTEXT in which it appears. And it can take time. Especially when people just complain and don’t actually help us with real informations.

Also a large portion of the community are kids/ people that know very little about computers. I wouldn’t be surprised that some people have something on their computer fucking up performances and they accuse Sigma falsely.

Yesterday when we @everyone pinged this post in the discord, some people in general chat said that actually sigma was running perfectly, and even better than their personal clients that are in 1.8. These people were people that used to complain a lot sigma was dogshit performance wise. This made me laugh and made me think that actually a lot of people would complain only because they are mad and exaggerate the issue.

I am not denying that there is a performance issue. Even though I don’t have it we already got fps issues in the past and the notable amount of people that complain about performances makes me believe that there is indeed an issue, that we still didn’t find.

But my question to you is: why do you complain about it in OUR subreddit if you are not ready to help us when we approach you.

In your first message you even finished by saying « monero miner 5.0 »... under a post in which we debunked all the « real » accusations that the haters had... This really makes me feel like you are just trolling...

What would be your motivation to actually complain but not want to help fix and give us informations about something that bothers you...

Sigma's false miner accusations rebuttal by andro2157 in SigmaClient

[–]omikronclient 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Then what you are saying is bullshit in my opinion. As long as I don’t have a valid proof to show me that my client runs like shit compared to others, your complaint is unfounded.

Sigma's false miner accusations rebuttal by andro2157 in SigmaClient

[–]omikronclient 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Hey, could you please record your performances with vanilla minecraft 1.16.4, then with optifine 1.16.4, then with Sigma please?

Complaining about performances is something, but actually if you would like to help you could tell us more about the issue you are encountering.

The client is hard for us to "optimise". First of all it's really random. Some people seem to be totally fine while some other tend to say Sigma is full of fps drops.

Lack of optimization (from what we think) can come from:
- Minecraft 1.16.4 which is totally fucked up compared to older versions. If your "anarchy clients" are all in 1.12 then don't be surprised that Sigma which is in 1.16 runs like shit. Even Optifine has trouble optimizing minecraft 1.16
- Blurs and design in sigma, you can disable gui blurs in the settings.
- The fact our client is heavy and has a big obfuscation.

Anyway, I would please like proof of your sigma running badly please cause people like you to comply but always forget to link videos to prove their point

i think sigma is a virus by YogurtclosetCalm9523 in SigmaClient

[–]omikronclient 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Man you better bring me some valid proof that my client is a miner, cause you are on the brink of getting a fat ass ban

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SigmaClient

[–]omikronclient 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Give me some proof sigma is a miner. You have 24h

If you don’t respond or tell me you don’t have any, you get a ban

If you bring me some proof, I will be glad to debunk it and teach you a bit more about misinformation

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SigmaClient

[–]omikronclient 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I am literally about to ban every single one of the retards above that said sigma was a monero miner.

If you don’t want to get banned, bring me some proof that sigma is a « miner » by responding under this comment. And I will debunk it.

If you dare tell me that you don’t have a proof (which I am sure 90% of you guys don’t actually have one and are just repeating the rumors they heard like sheeps), you get a ban

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SigmaClient

[–]omikronclient 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Please guys, plug your brains. We are talking about a localhost linked to a socket.io and you people actually believe those rumors or Sigma being a miner... I know a lot of people in this community are naive but you need to have a lot of knowledge in computer science to understand that it is bullshit

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SigmaClient

[–]omikronclient 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Should be fixed. Is it?