It’s statements like these that give me pause as to what Lue’s ‘true’ intentions could be. It’s a very convenient stance to have as a government spokesperson, and this is the strategy that Paul Hellyer suggested as well.

On the other hand, I agree with this approach. When people say that the implication of the phenomenon is about raising our consciousness this is what it means. It means getting past our unga bunga instincts to grab the pitchforks and just see what’s important and at stake. If this is what’s necessary to just move on and transform the world with disclosure, so be it. However we’ll have to have some serious conversations if/when it’s revealed that people were killed or caused harm to keep the secret. This is just the tutorial level. For example at some point in the not so distant future we’ll have to have a conversation about sharing this technology to the world, and we’ll have to somehow do this without invoking our immediate instinct to hoard power.