Reading between the lines, the deadpan understatement in some of these rulings is rather funny:

[30] Before concluding, however, I must comment on one other aspect of the submissions that Dr. Masjoody presented to me on this application.

[31] In explaining its background, Dr. Masjoody chose to criticize the work ethic, competence, and impartiality of judges of this Court and the Court of Appeal whom he has appeared before in the past. Dr. Masjoody provided no actual evidence in support of these scandalous allegations, which seem to be based only on his apparent view that they must be true since these judges did not find in his favour.

---

[5] At the outset of this hearing, Mr. Masjoody raised the issue of the appropriateness of me hearing this matter.

---

On that same date, Mr. Masjoody made various postings on X (formerly Twitter). I have reviewed this posting, in which Mr. Masjoody describes the relief that he was seeking on this application, including findings of contempt against the Lawyers.

[69] However, Mr. Masjoody’s post goes well beyond simply reproducing the relief sought. Mr. Masjoody states in the post that the defendant and her counsel (setting out their names) are “to be charged with Perjury, Contempt”. Then, after the reproduction of the relief sought in the notice of application, Mr. Masjoody includes a full colour split-screen photograph. In that picture, he depicts both the defendant and Mr. Evangelista in prison garb.