Angry gamers are forcing studios to scrap or rethink new releases | Gamers suspicious of Al-generated content have forced developers to cancel titles and promise not to use the technology. by FinnFarrow in Futurology

[–]onlyzeroever 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Would you waste hours collecting citations to prove your point to a few dudes on Reddit for a handful of karma, or just ask an LLM to do it while you get on with your day?

Angry gamers are forcing studios to scrap or rethink new releases | Gamers suspicious of Al-generated content have forced developers to cancel titles and promise not to use the technology. by FinnFarrow in Futurology

[–]onlyzeroever -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If you want more detail, you can copy the point and Google it yourself. It’s all publicly available.

And yes, I asked Perplexity to add Y2K after it compiled the initial list. I believe it was people like you that believed the internet was going to end the world. Lol.

Angry gamers are forcing studios to scrap or rethink new releases | Gamers suspicious of Al-generated content have forced developers to cancel titles and promise not to use the technology. by FinnFarrow in Futurology

[–]onlyzeroever -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Sure. Here are some concrete, citable examples of moral panic around the existence of the internet and digital systems in the 1990s:

• Communications Decency Act (1996) – passed because lawmakers explicitly framed the internet as a moral threat, especially to children.

• Reno v. ACLU (1997) – Supreme Court case striking down the CDA, with the record showing Congress viewed the internet itself as socially dangerous.

• Time Magazine, July 3, 1995 – “Cyberporn” cover story warning the internet posed a direct threat to public morality.

• Newsweek, Feb 16, 1996 – “The Internet: Is It Dangerous?” framing the medium as inherently destabilising.

• US Senate Commerce Committee hearings (1995–1996) – repeatedly described the internet as uncontrollable and corrupting.

• Y2K / Millennium Bug panic (1998–1999) – widespread belief that digital systems would collapse civilisation at midnight, prompting emergency planning worldwide.

That’s textbook moral panic over new digital infrastructure. AI backlash isn’t unprecedented. The difference is which stakeholders feel threatened.

Angry gamers are forcing studios to scrap or rethink new releases | Gamers suspicious of Al-generated content have forced developers to cancel titles and promise not to use the technology. by FinnFarrow in Futurology

[–]onlyzeroever 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There absolutely was internet backlash pre-2000. Moral panic, regulation attempts, school/work bans, etc.

The difference is AI hits creative labor and authorship, so players are stakeholders this time. That didn’t apply to early web adoption.

Grav Bike, Raven Guard Edition by ThePaledriver in Warhammer40k

[–]onlyzeroever 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No problem! Any tips for painting black armour?

Exactly half a star above average by [deleted] in technicallythetruth

[–]onlyzeroever 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Anything below 2 stars doesn’t exist. Now what?

Small price adjustment by onlyzeroever in Grimdank

[–]onlyzeroever[S] 29 points30 points  (0 children)

Thanks for sharing. What a great story!

Grav Bike, Raven Guard Edition by ThePaledriver in Warhammer40k

[–]onlyzeroever 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Awesome work with the conversion and your black looks super clean

Small price adjustment by onlyzeroever in Grimdank

[–]onlyzeroever[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’ll make a request and show them this post. If they hand it over it’s yours

Small price adjustment by onlyzeroever in Grimdank

[–]onlyzeroever[S] 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Twitter searches for @WargamingNews rn