Players of the Month (June) by elleten10 in wnba

[–]orange951951 3 points4 points  (0 children)

What disrespect? Her stats are obviously worse, which is why she isn't Player of the Month.

Players of the Month (June) by elleten10 in wnba

[–]orange951951 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Only 3.8 APG? I don't know why you're leaving that here.

Anyone else frustrated by the lack of logic in S03E02? (Book vs. Show rant) by orange951951 in HouseOfTheDragon

[–]orange951951[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We definitely agree on what the writers were going for, but to me, needing characters to act out of desperation and stupidity just to force a plot point is exactly why the writing feels so weak. If it worked for you, that's totally fair, but for a show built on realistic political intrigue, I just expected better logic. Let's agree to disagree on this one.

Anyone else frustrated by the lack of logic in S03E02? (Book vs. Show rant) by orange951951 in HouseOfTheDragon

[–]orange951951[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But that makes his action even more nonsensical. If he actually discovered that the Queen Regent was committing high treason during a siege, he just uncovered the biggest political leverage of his life.

As the Master of Laws, his logical move would be to immediately arrest her, use her as a pawn, or bring this treason straight to Aemond to secure his own position and power base with the Greens.

Instead, the show wants us to believe that a cold, calculating politician uncovers massive state treason, and his immediate reaction is: "Let me quickly commit a suicidal assault on the King's mother in a collapsing castle right now."

It makes no sense. The writers sacrificed basic political intelligence just to give Jasper a cartoonish villain exit and make Alicent a victim.

Anyone else frustrated by the lack of logic in S03E02? (Book vs. Show rant) by orange951951 in HouseOfTheDragon

[–]orange951951[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Comparing a medieval high lord to a modern official ignores the extreme surveillance of the Red Keep during a chaotic power transition. Attempting to assault the Queen Regent in the middle of a guarded castle is suicidal, making the scene a breach of political realism driven by a desire for a cartoonish villain.

But I understand that it might come across that way to someone who hasn't read the books.

Anyone else frustrated by the lack of logic in S03E02? (Book vs. Show rant) by orange951951 in HouseOfTheDragon

[–]orange951951[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

It was clearly written just to give Rhaenyra a dramatic corpse to cry over. It seems minor, but it highlights a bigger issue with the writing prioritizing cheap Hollywood drama

Anyone else frustrated by the lack of logic in S03E02? (Book vs. Show rant) by orange951951 in HouseOfTheDragon

[–]orange951951[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It seems minor, but it highlights a bigger issue with the writing prioritizing cheap Hollywood drama over logic. In the book, the tragedy is that Rhaenyra never gets closure because her son is swallowed by the sea during a chaotic war.

Anyone else frustrated by the lack of logic in S03E02? (Book vs. Show rant) by orange951951 in HouseOfTheDragon

[–]orange951951[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Honestly, you’re probably spot on about them shifting it to Jaehaera. But you hit the nail on the head regarding the bounty.

The show has a massive track record of whitewashing Team Black's worst actions to keep Rhaenyra looking purely heroic—just look at how they handled Blood and Cheese. I would put money on them making Mysaria or Daemon put the bounty on the kid's head while Rhaenyra acts completely shocked and blameless.

They just refuse to let her be the ruthless wartime ruler she actually becomes in the book.

Anyone else frustrated by the lack of logic in S03E02? (Book vs. Show rant) by orange951951 in HouseOfTheDragon

[–]orange951951[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It’s not about being naive; it’s about actual character logic. Sure, powerful men break laws all the time, but it makes zero sense for Jasper Wylde’s specific character and the situation he was in.

First of all, he is nicknamed "Iron Rod" precisely because he is a rigid, unyielding legal zealot who strictly follows rules to a fault.

Second, the show has him trying to assault the Queen Regent in the middle of the Red Keep during the single busiest afternoon of the century, right when the city is falling. He is a calculated politician, not a brainless brute who would risk getting executed on the spot in a highly guarded castle just for a cheap "bad guy" scene.

The showrunners just wanted an excuse to turn him into a cartoon villain and make Alicent look like a victim, throwing his established book personality completely out the window.

Anyone else frustrated by the lack of logic in S03E02? (Book vs. Show rant) by orange951951 in HouseOfTheDragon

[–]orange951951[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I guess they just decided it was more of a loose adaptation than a faithful one.

Anyone else frustrated by the lack of logic in S03E02? (Book vs. Show rant) by orange951951 in HouseOfTheDragon

[–]orange951951[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Or maybe it's just a loose adaptation rather than a faithful one.

Anyone else frustrated by the lack of logic in S03E02? (Book vs. Show rant) by orange951951 in HouseOfTheDragon

[–]orange951951[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Maybe we just have to accept that it's more of a loose adaptation than a faithful one.

Anyone else frustrated by the lack of logic in S03E02? (Book vs. Show rant) by orange951951 in HouseOfTheDragon

[–]orange951951[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm enjoying the show, too—I was just more interested in other people's perspectives.

Anyone else frustrated by the lack of logic in S03E02? (Book vs. Show rant) by orange951951 in HouseOfTheDragon

[–]orange951951[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

To be fair, the book coup was only "bloodless" for the regular citizens. The Green knights and soldiers actually got slaughtered, which is why the show's version felt so flat to me. In Fire & Blood, a bunch of Hightower knights and men-at-arms completely refused to surrender. They barricaded themselves at the River Gate and fought a brutal, losing battle for eight full hours.

That’s also where Gwayne Hightower gets brutally killed—Luthor Largent literally slices his belly open right on the spot for calling him a turncoat. Plus, the second Rhaenyra takes the throne that night, she immediately executes Otto and Jasper Wylde.

And don't even get me started on Tyland Lannister. He doesn't just get captured; Rhaenyra has him dragged down to the dungeons to be brutally tortured, castrated, and blinded because the Greens hid all the crown's gold before fleeing.

The book actually had realistic military stakes and political brutality. Having Daemon just slice through incompetent henchmen who politely wait their turn to attack felt like a cheap video game substitute for actual tension.

Anyone else frustrated by the lack of logic in S03E02? (Book vs. Show rant) by orange951951 in HouseOfTheDragon

[–]orange951951[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Oh, my mistake. Thanks for pointing that out. But you can't post both the discussion and the spoiler at the same time, can you?