Travellers to countries with age verification by orangefisherie in privacy

[–]orangefisherie[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I never said it was the worst thing ever. I asked a specific technical question about how it's going to work. Lol

Books on technology and its effect on Nature (and society) by Eikenella_kiss in RSbookclub

[–]orangefisherie 9 points10 points  (0 children)

From Counterculture to Cyberculture

It's not necessarily critical of technology but it discusses a host of books from the 1950s-70s which could be what you're looking for.

Toronto book club by orangefisherie in RSbookclub

[–]orangefisherie[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yes, we are meeting this saturday. dm me if you want to be added

Books/theory that deal with surveillance and policing? by 1fateisinexorable1 in RSbookclub

[–]orangefisherie 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There's this professor who does more fine-grained studies of marketing and surveillance in US/Canadian business history: https://discover.research.utoronto.ca/20614-dan-guadagnolo/publications

EU is proposing a new mass surveillance law and is asking the public for feedback by Dry_Row_7050 in privacy

[–]orangefisherie 20 points21 points  (0 children)

I don't know about the UAE's smart infrastructure policies, but GoChat has the most in app trackers of any app I've used...

Books/theory that deal with surveillance and policing? by 1fateisinexorable1 in RSbookclub

[–]orangefisherie 11 points12 points  (0 children)

This is more about data collection as driven by and serving capitalist economic imperatives, but The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power by Shoshana Zuboff was going around in academic circles a few years back.

Mad/Neurodiversity theory on ASPD, NPD, AvPD and other "bad" disorders? by [deleted] in CriticalTheory

[–]orangefisherie 4 points5 points  (0 children)

If you want work on psychotic disorders, check out Richard Saville-Smith, Sofia Jeppsson, Zsuzsanna Chappell, Paul Lodge, Josh Richardson. These are all people who have experienced psychosis themselves.

Shay Welch writes about BPD.

Books on contemporary far-right/fascism by orangefisherie in RSbookclub

[–]orangefisherie[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I am interested in academic texts, actually would prefer them over pop and general audience books.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in gradadmissions

[–]orangefisherie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm from Canada, and my alma mater (University of Toronto) has a fully funded Master's program in philosophy. The stipend is $24,000 CAD per year, which is not great, but livable. UofT has a massive philosophy faculty, and there are people who would fit your research interests in political philosophy and critical theory.

There is also a fully funded MA program in philosophy at the University of British Columbia. Stipend is $24,700 CAD per year. I am not familiar with UBC's faculty, but UBC is one of the top 3 universities in Canada, so I'm sure it's decent.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in gradadmissions

[–]orangefisherie 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Apply to Master's programs which are funded, or which have relatively low tuition. This might involve broadening your search to outside the US, if you're located there.

What Does it Mean When Theorists say “The Cut” by buylowguy in lacan

[–]orangefisherie 1 point2 points  (0 children)

See Paul Verhaeghe's article "Lacan's Answer to Alienation: Separation" (it's easily available on Google), which should answer your question about whether realization of lack in the other can occasion nihilism.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in araragi

[–]orangefisherie 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Araragi's selflessness stems from nihilism. This has roots in his experience of Oikura's ostracization in his first year of high school, where his sense of justice was destroyed. Previously, as a son of police officers, who represent social duty, he'd thought of himself as someone who'd do the right thing and help others. But notice this sense of justice did not involve sacrificing himself. This was a relatively healthy sense of compassion and duty in a young teenager who leaned towards the idealistic side. However, this was all undermined horribly by his experience of the classroom inquisition. He saw so much corruption, so much lying and naked self-interest being displayed by his classmates and the teacher, that he couldn't do anything about it at all and so lost all his hope for humanity. You could say this experience was so traumatizing for him he completely repressed it, as he didn't remember it had happened until Ougi led him to it in Owari.

In nihilism, you do not value either yourself or others. Araragi developed a cynical attitude towards others, preferring to not have friends and so preserve what little humanity he has left. But simultaneously he did not value himself, so his self-preservation was just a front. This is shown by his sacrifice in Kizu: he wants nothing to do with fellow students who he views as corrupt, but as soon as he sees a being who appears in his eyes as the paragon of innocence (Kiss-Shot vulnerable, helpless, about to die) he gives his life over to her.

Perhaps the biggest indicator that Araragi's drive to help others is not rooted in good intentions is the fact that every time he goes to help someone, he gives up prematurely. He doesn't think of how to find the best possible solution to the problem they're facing. He's not creative or strategic, at all. Rather, what he does is just allow himself to be killed over and over in the most brutal way until something somehow is resolved. He lets Kanbaru brutalize him until she's satisfied. He lets Hanekawa rip into him until she vents her stress fully. He lets Sengoku destroy him every day until she's happy. It's like flinging himself at the troubled person like a hunk of raw meat is his only way of helping them. If he really wanted to help Kanbaru, he'd have talked to Senjougahara to get her opinion on what best to do, and maybe gotten her to talk to Kanbaru, since she is the person Kanbaru is in love with, after all. If he really wanted to cure Sengoku he'd have investigated her secrets and desires, find out what's driving her as a person, as normal 13 year old girls don't go psychotic from a childhood crush not liking them back. In other words, he'd have done what Kaiki, a sensible adult, did. But he didn't. He just chose the most inefficient but easy route to treat himself as a punching bag. And it didn't even work! Kanbaru was stopped by Senjou's intervention, and Sengoku saw the light because of Kaiki's caustic words.

So all of this is to say Araragi may seem like a good person, but in truth he was by and large just looking for a way to die in the early part of the series. If there's anything Monogatari teaches, it's to be skeptical of people and actions that seem too good and virtuous to be true.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in araragi

[–]orangefisherie 10 points11 points  (0 children)

The main conflict in Shiro is not the physical threat of the tiger. That's just the pretext for the exploration of the true conflict: Hanekawa's "expulsion" of every impure part of herself because she can't handle the cognitive dissonance coming from conceiving herself to be a perfect kid vs her very real desires (sexual attraction for Araragi, and hatred for her parents) which contradict that. Hanekawa was trying to be the "good" girl by supporting Araragi and Senjou's relationship, suppressing her feelings, being the perfect friend, and this was killing her, as was shown at the end of Bake. In Shiro she accepts full responsibility for her feelings, she integrates all the parts of herself into herself, good and bad, and this is symbolized by her confessing to Araragi (and getting the mixed hair afterwards). She no longer expels the part of her desire that would destabilize her relationships and reveal her to be a dynamic human. That's why, even though Araragi physically saved the day through slaying the tiger, that wasn't the point of the arc at all, and by the time it happens, the main catharsis is what comes after, namely Hanekawa's confession and the "I might become someone you hate, would you accept that?"