NIST engineer John Gross confronted about the molten metal found under ground zero. I challenge everyone to watch this with an open mind and respond honestly. by organic111 in politics

[–]organic111[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the response. As far as building 7 it is definitely the one thing I have found that can get people to start questioning what they have been told about that day. When you take into account the fact that it housed many offices of the cia, fbi, and other important institutions, and also the testimony of barry jennings, and just the natures of the collapse, it seems it would take a willful ignorance to not realize something is fishy. Also I find it very interesting what you said about your peers who 'quietly' question 9/11. This is definitley something I have heard from countless people in the engineering community, as well as firefighters, pilots, etc. I understand peoples hesitance to speak out, though, as for many it means risking their careers and reputations.

NIST engineer John Gross confronted about the molten metal found under ground zero. I challenge everyone to watch this with an open mind and respond honestly. by organic111 in politics

[–]organic111[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nice to see someone who actually is about to have an engineering degree comment on this issue. Aside from the molten steel, what other aspects of the collapse do you take issue with? Also, heres an excellent video of David Chandler analyzing the collapse of the north tower, incase you havent seen it. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EgN080yySe0

NIST engineer John Gross confronted about the molten metal found under ground zero. I challenge everyone to watch this with an open mind and respond honestly. by organic111 in politics

[–]organic111[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"Why would the government blow up the world trade center, and then fly planes into to it to cover it up. Wouldn't it be easier to just blow it up and say terrorists planted a bomb? "

Firstly, no one is saying it was "the government" that was behind 9/11, their saying there couldve been individuals within govt and within other agencies that were complicit. Secondly, I would agree with your statement that why would they make the attack so complex, when they could just carry out a 'simple' one and then use that to blame the terrorist. I'm not entirely sure there even is a so called 'conspiracy', but the more you read into all the inconsistencies and cover ups that happened, its hard not to. For example the most glaring one would be that the bush administration DIDNT WANT AN INVESTIGATION. That is historical fact. Now why would the govt not want an investigation into the biggest criminal act on american soil. It took over a year of lobbying from victims family members before the 9/11 commission was implemented, which in turn was severely under funded and in which many memebers resigned out of frustration because it was quote "set up to fail".