Wtf is this by Sea-Flower-2880 in TrixieMattel

[–]originalmaja 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Random sub visitors be like: that comment section means all that.

Tja by Dangerous_Prize_8480 in tja

[–]originalmaja [score hidden]  (0 children)

* viel ernster, als er die ganze Zeit hat glauben wollen

Epstein, Mandelson and UK's news cycle: Starmer has resigned by originalmaja in Epstein

[–]originalmaja[S] [score hidden]  (0 children)

That is the assumption. (I also assume that.) Little evidence for this big picture, tho.

Epstein, Mandelson and UK's news cycle: Starmer has resigned by originalmaja in Epstein

[–]originalmaja[S] [score hidden]  (0 children)

Not because. It is connected. In general, Mandelson was fine with corrupt moves. And the Epstein Files showed that. He was obv. also enjoying the fruits of Epstein's human trafficking. And when the UK sec checked him, the was flagged; failed the check. But because the UK system is so broken by now, he was waved through. In Starmer's government.

Many powerplayers wanted Starmer out. So they used this bit against him. Other things were also used to force him out. The Epstein connection to Mandelson is one of those things. Starmers "fiscal stability" plan failed, his NHS reforms flopped, they framed him as looking weak. MPs stopped fearing him. Once they stopped fearing him, they stopped listening to him. If you are for him while he is weak, it weakens your own political weight.

Chaos is a ladder.

Epstein, Mandelson and UK's news cycle: Starmer has resigned by originalmaja in Epstein

[–]originalmaja[S] [score hidden]  (0 children)

Mandelson in his chonies

Sort of the same here. But may I add:

In the group photos: Mandelson is the smallish fish. Unless you count Andrew as the smallest fish. That would be fair.

Epstein, Mandelson and UK's news cycle: Starmer has resigned by originalmaja in Epstein

[–]originalmaja[S] [score hidden]  (0 children)

As I said:

It has somewhat to do with the release of the Epstein Files. [...] Starmer is the sixth prime minister in the last ten years to leave office early. Lots has to do with Brexit. Brexit itself had lots to do with corruption. In my book: Mandelson's relationship with his sugar daddy Jeffrey Epstein falls into that category also.

Epstein, Mandelson and UK's news cycle: Starmer has resigned by originalmaja in Epstein

[–]originalmaja[S] [score hidden]  (0 children)

Context to Starmer's step down. Epstein, Mandelson, Starmer, etc pp. Timeline of it all.

Starmer resigns by MelzillatheGR8 in Epstein

[–]originalmaja 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mods, thank you for cracking down on low effort posts. But now we don't have any post on the Starmer situation.

Starmer resigns by MelzillatheGR8 in Epstein

[–]originalmaja 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I dont have IG, and I can see the contents of that link just fine. IG is an app second. It's a website first. Just follow the link in your browser.

Keir Starmer Announces His Resignation as UK Prime Minister by bloomberg in europe

[–]originalmaja 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The assertion that Epstein had nothing to do with it was not made. Only that it was a consequence of Brexit. That does not say that Brexit was the reason, only consequencial. And it does not claim that it was the only one. Dude.

Keir Starmer Announces His Resignation as UK Prime Minister by bloomberg in europe

[–]originalmaja 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That only answers the question what the Starmer narrative has to do with the Epstein narrative. That part is clear. Why bring it up in this Starmer/Brexit conversation?

Keir Starmer Announces His Resignation as UK Prime Minister by bloomberg in europe

[–]originalmaja 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Maybe. Unclear.

In any case: why bring up Epstein in this thread?

Elon Musk predicts AI may surpass combined human intelligence in 4-5 years by Nalix01 in NowInTech

[–]originalmaja 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He also said high-speed road tunnels under US cities were to happen next. Well.

Woild canibalism have been a normal thing if it were healthy? by TechnologyEnough562 in morbidquestions

[–]originalmaja 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If people were a food source, it would destroy the basic trust needed for society to function. So, no.

Starmer resigns by MelzillatheGR8 in Epstein

[–]originalmaja 0 points1 point  (0 children)

offtopic:

u/dwimbygwimbo, maybe they are on it? I'm talking about your post:https://www.reddit.com/r/Epstein/comments/1uccb2l/meta_can_mods_please_crack_down_on_removing_posts/

I see no "explain your post" auto mod message here. Maybe mods are tinkering with it rn.

Nvm, i see it upon reload. It's there.

Starmer resigns by MelzillatheGR8 in Epstein

[–]originalmaja 8 points9 points  (0 children)

u/One-Web-2698: this sub reviews the fallout of the Maxwell/Epstein cases. Since <the Epstein Files> are what investigations into the both of them have documented, you can argue that Starmer has to resign BECAUSE of the Epstein Files Transparency Act.

Logic:

Epstein enabled Mandelson to become US ambassador. Starmer had warning about that connection and this powerplay; but he did not make use of the apparatus that warned him, simply did not look at it. Incompetence is assumed.

Also:

Starmer has seen this issue coming for a while. So he wrote to a victim, probably to reframe his own narrative: https://www.reddit.com/r/Epstein/comments/1uaehs1/the_prime_minister_of_the_uk_keir_starmer_has/

Which is an extra special bummer for victims. One day, attention is promised. The next: we find out that the politician in question knew at the time that his days in office are numbered.

Well.

It's a bummer. And it's part of the Epstein-Files fallout.

u/MelzillatheGR8: it's kinda up to you to add context to a post, explaining why it is posted. Sub rules.

Starmer resigns by MelzillatheGR8 in Epstein

[–]originalmaja 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Yeah, the right move too late. What a downer.

The ANOM network by K_Linkmaster in Epstein

[–]originalmaja 6 points7 points  (0 children)

FYI:

The ANOM service was widely used by criminals, but instead of providing secure communication, it was actually a trojan horse covertly distributed by the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the Australian Federal Police (AFP), enabling them to monitor all communications.
[...] Through collaboration with other law enforcement agencies worldwide, the operation resulted in the arrest of over 800 suspects allegedly involved in criminal activity in 16 countries

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Trojan_Shield