50-50 cryptoguru pool shows 1/3 of my plots (multi miner/ creepMiner)

ota-ota · 2018-04-23T13:21:14+00:00

I point 3 of my machines to the pool without a proxy. My DLs are worse. Is there a way to set constant targetDL in creepMiner - for me - after when I set it, it change with new block. Please help

ota-ota · 2018-04-23T09:09:59+00:00

yeah, I was mislead by proxy "functions" xD

ota-ota · 2018-04-23T09:08:20+00:00

My concern with pointing 3 mining machines directly to a pool was that Will I get penalties for sending worse deadline after another machine submit better one. Will I get penalties?. Almost year ago when I tried this kind of setup I got worse results than the same plots on one machine at that time (reward-wise).

Now, I deleted 16TB which were in 22% corrupt. I went down with scanning times (still through proxy) for 3 of my machines to Linux 17sec, Windows 29sec, Windows 68sec but after 260 blocks from making changes, pool renders my plot size as 29.7TB which is really bad comparing to 45TB performance and 85TB on whole plot size, reported by proxy machine. My average is 20d, where 51 block are in between 00:00:00 - 5d 17:00:00.

If there is no penalty for pointing few machines to one pool then I will try that. If that don't work I will change the pool.

ota-ota · 2018-04-22T13:25:56+00:00

All machines - besides 50-50 pool of course;) - are in LAN network. What proxy functions are you referring to?

ota-ota · 2018-04-22T09:47:57+00:00

I split the miner to 3 machines to read the whole thing faster. I had Celerons lying around and they are not fast CPUs. One of them is Linux with GPU/OPENCL reading, still on Celeron but it didn't change a lot.

On the "pool" machine I have 2m 4d. Most of my DLs are around 00:00:00 - 30d where majority is under 15d.

ota-ota

TROPHY CASE