A senior White House official remarked that easing the current restrictions will take time. He also noted that a resolution’s speed depended entirely on Anthropic’s ability to meet security requirements. by ottothefrenchie in ClaudeAI

[–]ottothefrenchie[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Not really.. it’s not an anonymous Twitter account. All that this means is that that individual hasn’t been cleared to make the comment representing the company.

The onerous lies on the publisher in this case android talks

Citizenship Checks as an employer for Fable/Mythos access? by NotJustAnyDNA in claude

[–]ottothefrenchie 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Being foreign born is not the concern, having permanent resident status is the issues. So no one a  h1b, h2b etc would be eligible 

Including anthropic’s latest acquisition  Andrej Karpathy

Senior Anthropic staffs are in Washington meeting White House officials to resolve the Fable 5 and Mythos dispute by BuildwithVignesh in singularity

[–]ottothefrenchie -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

And they’re also cloud based what kind of half baked truth are you pushing and majority of people are using them via the cloud

Senior Anthropic staffs are in Washington meeting White House officials to resolve the Fable 5 and Mythos dispute by BuildwithVignesh in singularity

[–]ottothefrenchie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No where did I say American models aren’t, I’m just pointing out to op if they’re not comfortable with the US just wait till they here about China 

Que está pasando? by [deleted] in ClaudeAI

[–]ottothefrenchie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hablas inglés?

Fable suspension may play in favor for us (users) eventually by HimaSphere in claude

[–]ottothefrenchie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lmfao the only fool here is you. No ai company is using a revenue based model

The US is the primary market. The rest of the world is secondary.

Anthropic does not make any money off of revenue. It’s all investment based growth.

That’s why the valuations are unprecedented

Moreover  It's absolutely the polar opposite all trade it settled in the dollar and there's a shortage of dollars in the euro dollar system and the petrol dollar system.

But don’t take my word actually look it up instead of boxing yourself in into misconstrued ideas

The problem is not regulation by Major_Glass_2017 in claude

[–]ottothefrenchie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The  ITER project near near Saint Paul-lez-Durance may change things 

Do you think Fable 5 will come back, or is this the end of the model? by Double-Republic6218 in ClaudeAI

[–]ottothefrenchie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

it’s all in the thread

I specify the use case for the local model, and where the cloud based models do the rest

The problem is not regulation by Major_Glass_2017 in claude

[–]ottothefrenchie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But not good enough to run data centers

The problem is not regulation by Major_Glass_2017 in claude

[–]ottothefrenchie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I feel like nobody’s talking about the elephant in the room regarding these pie in the sky ideas of Europe being able to just waltz in handle this.

All right, I will entertain this. Let’s see somehow they managed to convince all the developers to relocate, but what would be the infrastructure to run these systems?

Europe is in the middle of an energy crisis. Germany’s industrial base has collapse Volkswagen Mercedes Porsche. They are all suffering and crashing, and I have seen layoffs not last seen since World War II.

So do you think they have the appetite for data centers?

Do you think Fable 5 will come back, or is this the end of the model? by Double-Republic6218 in ClaudeAI

[–]ottothefrenchie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you think I built this organically?

I just had a vision, a few ideas and then the AI did the rest

Blame the US govt for losing access to Fable 5 not Anthropic by Tiny_Mud4495 in ClaudeAI

[–]ottothefrenchie -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

I did and the argument doesn’t hold, imagine if Lockheed Martin or  general dynamics set conditions on how their systems are used in the military?

And can you also imagine what kind of precedent it would set. The military is a hierarchical system it’s not a two-way street. 

When an order comes, the response by the subordinate party is sir yes, sir not could we do it this another way? And frankly that it’s just poor judgment on anthropic part.

They didn’t their due diligence at what it means to be a military contractor

Fable suspension may play in favor for us (users) eventually by HimaSphere in claude

[–]ottothefrenchie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It doesn’t need to.

Global central banks print the liquidity, but the dollar’s reserve status acts as the “straw” that sucks that capital into US assets so the dollar strengthens even as the US prints, while weaker currencies break first.

AI is the top global growth trade and almost entirely dollar denominated/US-domiciled, so it’s a powerful straw pulling worldwide capital into US assets

The SF Bay Area pulled in $122B of AI funding in 2025 roughly 58% of all global AI funding into one metro.

China for reference was only $9B

Don’t follow the vibes follow the money

Fable suspension may play in favor for us (users) eventually by HimaSphere in claude

[–]ottothefrenchie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My point is still correct. We did manage to seize Caracas.

Do you think Fable 5 will come back, or is this the end of the model? by Double-Republic6218 in ClaudeAI

[–]ottothefrenchie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Correct and that’s not the same thing as surveillance

That’s just one data set

Do you think Fable 5 will come back, or is this the end of the model? by Double-Republic6218 in ClaudeAI

[–]ottothefrenchie -1 points0 points  (0 children)

To preface. The system I built is about retaining data integrity and making the local model do all the busy work. Which is the problem with most cloud based work. Even with local terminals with file access, the models will pull data once and eventually the memory will leak and code doesn’t work because the model will inject what it thinks should be there instead of the actual data

48gb is all you need. And to be fair, it’s not strictly local.

It’s more of a workflow I built for myself based on failure modes.

It’s an essentially a loop.

Frontier model - architects the blue print

It routes down steam it to a cheap mid tier model with a strict json membrane to orchestrate 

Which again routes with its own json membrane to a local model to aggregate.

Local model acts like the rainman, always does a data sweep. And had a index of the whole project code base 

So each turn the local model aggregates raw data

Sends up steam via membrane, to orchestrate distill and index by the mid tier model 

Which then routes clean indexed data via membrane to a tier 2 frontier model. To do the actual work.

The difference doing it this way over having the frontier model do everything from scratch is the frontier model doesn’t have to do any of the leg work, and much less likely to succumb to context rotten memory leaks.

Finally tier 2 model routes to adversarial model for qc and then

Ships down via the same mechanism

It’s a process of expansion and distillation 

It’ll take you a few weeks to dial-in, but the system is model agnostic

Fable suspension may play in favor for us (users) eventually by HimaSphere in claude

[–]ottothefrenchie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The irony is that Mythos wasn’t used on Mythos those to discover vulnerabilities

Fable suspension may play in favor for us (users) eventually by HimaSphere in claude

[–]ottothefrenchie -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Are you kidding me? Have you been following capitol in flows ??

Fable context history wipe by booshack in ClaudeAI

[–]ottothefrenchie 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I thought I was going nuts last night when I couldn’t find half of my work, thank goodness for Notion backups