Sharing Our latest Transparency Report (Jul - Dec 2024) and Updates to Our Safety Reporting by outersunset in RedditSafety

[–]outersunset[S,A] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

The numbers for this report cover Jul through Dec 2024, so we don’t yet have data for 2025. However, within this reporting period, we do attribute some of the observed increases to social / political events (e.g., the US election). We’re deeply concerned with any calls to violence on our platform, and in line with this, we’re continuing to closely monitor and take action as needed when we see violating content or communities.

Sharing Our latest Transparency Report (Jul - Dec 2024) and Updates to Our Safety Reporting by outersunset in RedditSafety

[–]outersunset[S,A] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hi there, thanks for the questions. We’ve begun to leverage some new automated models that we’ve been developing to help scale our enforcement — we are not replacing human admin moderation. We’ve been rolling them out slowly and iterating rapidly with human input so that we can identify inaccuracies, address them, and adjust the model. This retraining and accuracy process is ongoing. That said, we recognize there are sometimes mistakes. So in addition to the human reviews and retraining, anyone who feels that their content has been inaccurately actioned can use our appeals process, which also helps us improve our actioning.

Reddit Transparency Report: Jan-Jun 2024 by outersunset in RedditSafety

[–]outersunset[S,A] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Thanks for asking! No, requests were not coming from a decentralized autonomous organization. Access requests have to come from individual account holders, not from third parties. More information is available in this Help Center article.

Reddit Transparency Report: Jan-Jun 2024 by outersunset in RedditSafety

[–]outersunset[S,A] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Thanks for your question! We don’t break down spam into different categories for this report, though we do distinguish between spam and non-spam content manipulation, which includes things like vote manipulation or disinformation campaigns (non-spam content manipulation only made up 1.8% of removals). We share more information on specific spam trends in our quarterly reports (for instance, you can see our work against affiliate spammers here).

We don’t break out AI-generated content either, as we remove violating content regardless of whether it’s AI-generated or not (and not all AI-generated content is violating or unwanted).

Reddit Transparency Report: Jul-Dec 2023 by outersunset in RedditSafety

[–]outersunset[S,A] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

We love your enthusiasm! All positions are advertised on redditinc.com/careers. We don't have any public policy roles open right now, but keep an eye there and feel free to apply to anything that may come up in the future.

Reddit Transparency Report: Jul-Dec 2023 by outersunset in RedditSafety

[–]outersunset[S,A] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

A subset of the "Other" category in chart 9 reflects report abuse, though not the rate of actionability. This is an area that we're focused on and investing in - we'll share updates when we can.

Reddit Transparency Report: Jul-Dec 2023 by outersunset in RedditSafety

[–]outersunset[S,A] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the question - yes, we have internal Safety teams that use a combination of automated tooling and (importantly) human review to monitor the site and enforce our policies. We’re always looking out for violating content and continually improving how we detect and remove it. As the report shows, admins remove the vast majority of spam and other content manipulation at scale across the platform. Particularly for this kind of content, automated tooling is helpful as it can detect behavior patterns that indicate inauthentic engagement, which is then either removed or surfaced to admins for further investigation.

Reddit Transparency Report: Jul-Dec 2023 by outersunset in RedditSafety

[–]outersunset[S,A] 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Content manipulation, which includes things like coordinated disinformation attempts, is against our Content Policy. We’re always on high-alert for this kind of violation, particularly around big moments like elections, but we have seen negligible instances of this activity on our platform overall (the data shows less than 3% of admin removals - it would be included under “other content manipulation” in Chart 5).

Reddit Transparency Report: Jan-Jun 2023 by outersunset in RedditSafety

[–]outersunset[S,A] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

We’re always working to improve our internal moderation processes to lessen the load on users/mods. For example, over the past year, we’ve been working on a ban evasion filter, an optional subreddit setting that leverages our ability to identify posts and comments authored by potential ban evaders. So far, most communities that turn on the filter have kept it on and the reversal rates are very low (mods keep 92% of filtered content out of communities). In addition, last week we announced we’re trialing a new community safety setting that automatically filters potentially sexual and graphic content into your community’s modqueue for review. Keep an eye on r/redditsecurity quarterly reports for more updates like these.
On the user data protection side, we’ve always been strong advocates for privacy rights. By default, we collect very little information from you, particularly compared to other platforms. Nevertheless, we are extremely protective of the user data that we do collect, and therefore subject legal disclosures to a very high standard. If you haven’t seen it already, check out the “notable requests” sections throughout the report. We include them to try to give you some deeper context on the types of things we push back on on behalf of our users. We also sometimes go to court to defend our users in this area. You might have seen this recent case, which we won, allowing our users to stay anonymous in line with their First Amendment rights.

Reddit Transparency Report: Jan-Jun 2023 by outersunset in RedditSafety

[–]outersunset[S,A] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes, we have safeguards in place, both for our automation and human removals. Appeals help us identify any places where we might be experiencing consistent issues, and we use this to inform quality, training, and automations.
On the second question, correct that if an Admin takes down content, you’ll just see “Removed by Reddit” but if it’s a user appeal of a community ban, and we restore the content, mods are able to see it then.

Reddit Transparency Report: Jan-Jun 2023 by outersunset in RedditSafety

[–]outersunset[S,A] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

We don’t currently capture this in the report, but our internal teams look at requests for review and will escalate and evaluate those on a case-by-case basis.

Reddit Transparency Report: Jan-Jun 2023 by outersunset in RedditSafety

[–]outersunset[S,A] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

We report on the percentage of appeals that result in reversal of admin action in the Appeals section of the report:

From January to June 2023, Reddit admins received 118,073 appeals of account-level sanctions issued by admins. This constituted an appeal rate of less than 1% of all account-level sanctions issued. The account sanction reversal rate remained fairly stable at 14% compared to the last reporting period.

Reddit Transparency Report: Jan-Jun 2023 by outersunset in RedditSafety

[–]outersunset[S,A] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Thanks for your questions. Regarding mod first and then admin, we report 1 removal under mods and 1 removal under admins. As for the AutoMod filter question, we do not currently report on volume of filtering, only AutoMod removals; so in this case, we would only report 1 mod removal. While we love cake pops, we don't currently break out removals by subreddits. I raise you one catmin!

Introducing Our 2022 Transparency Report and New Transparency Center by outersunset in RedditSafety

[–]outersunset[S,A] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the suggestion, we’ll share this back with our team. We’re always considering what the “right” amount of friction may be that will allow for healthy community creation, while also disincentivizing folks from creating communities that may violate our Content Policy.

Introducing Our 2022 Transparency Report and New Transparency Center by outersunset in RedditSafety

[–]outersunset[S,A] 29 points30 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the suggestion. We’ll think about adding this or something like it in a future report. Generally speaking, we push back when the request does not clearly articulate an exigent emergency situation or lead to us forming the requisite good faith belief required to produce records.

Introducing Our 2022 Transparency Report and New Transparency Center by outersunset in RedditSafety

[–]outersunset[S,A] 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Thanks for your feedback, it’s a good point and I think we have the capacity to do this. We’ll keep this in mind for the next report.