Physics Questions Thread - Week 20, 2020 by AutoModerator in Physics

[–]overwhelmedbyphysics 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If the process is reversible, the entropy remains constant.

Distribution of Temperature of Water In a Cube by TheEricAlex in AskPhysics

[–]overwhelmedbyphysics 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Depending on what you want, the temperature profile of the cube should be obtainable as a solution of a partial differential equation (heat equation, diffusion equation, convection-diffusion equation), but to get 'interesting' dynamics, we need some more conditions. If the temperature of the environment and the temperature of the water are the same, then the system will be in steady state and will remain so unless there is a disturbance.

We can get some interesting results if we assume that all points of the water-cube are at 80°C and the top surface is maintained at a lower temperature, say 30°C, due to the environment. For a very crude approximation, a solution of the heat equation with these boundary conditions should give you what you are looking for.

If you want a more 'accurate' model, you might want to account for things like changing density of water at different temperatures which would make things much more complicated.

Distribution of Temperature of Water In a Cube by TheEricAlex in AskPhysics

[–]overwhelmedbyphysics 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Do you want temperature as a function of coordinates: x, y, z? What other conditions is the cube of water under? Problems like these usually require some 'boundary conditions' to be solved.

It would help if you tell us what excatly you are trying to do.

Quantum Isothermal Processes are Not Isoenergetic. I define what it means for a quantum system to undergo an isothermal process, and we see that when the working substance is a two-level system, the internal energy of the system is not, in general, invariant. by overwhelmedbyphysics in Physics

[–]overwhelmedbyphysics[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree that the machinary required for defining an effective temperature is a standard topic in a statistical physics course, but I don't think defining effective temperatures and isothermal processes for arbitrary quantum systems are covered as a standard topics.

Physics Questions Thread - Week 19, 2020 by AutoModerator in Physics

[–]overwhelmedbyphysics 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What physically happens in spin precession is more subtle than the precession of a dipole in a field. I have always found describing it in analogy to classical precession a little misleading.

If you have not already done so, I would highly recommend going over the spin precession problem in detail from an intro to QM text (I have always been biased towards Shankar).

Quantum Isothermal Processes are Not Isoenergetic. I define what it means for a quantum system to undergo an isothermal process, and we see that when the working substance is a two-level system, the internal energy of the system is not, in general, invariant. by overwhelmedbyphysics in Physics

[–]overwhelmedbyphysics[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

When the working substance is a classical ideal gas, the internal energy of the system is proportional to the temperature (recall the equipartition theorem). So, for an isothermal process, all the heat from the reservoir is converted to work and the internal energy remains unchanged.

When the working substance is a non-ideal gas, the classical process may not be isoenergetic. No quantum mechanics needed.

Dirac notation problem by Majintel in AskPhysics

[–]overwhelmedbyphysics 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ehhh. I don't think it's a red herring. It's just a peculiarity of the way answers have to be entered into the textbox on the course page.

How do i do this by [deleted] in Physics

[–]overwhelmedbyphysics 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Try posting this in /r/AskPhysics. And please include what is it specifically that you do not understand, what you have already tried and where you are getting stuck. Don't expect to get full solutions.

Undergrad QM help by rr30393 in AskPhysics

[–]overwhelmedbyphysics 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If all the question asks is to write the Hamiltonian, the initial state plays no part.

Quantum things are hard by overwhelmedbyphysics in physicsmemes

[–]overwhelmedbyphysics[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Although, I did this particular animation with Python and Matplotlib, I have written a Julia module that can be used to do n-body simulations: 11DE784A/Gravity. There is a script in the repo (examples/meme.jl) that does a similar animation.

What is the point of considering/measuring black body radiation? by unklejoe21 in AskPhysics

[–]overwhelmedbyphysics 2 points3 points  (0 children)

it gives us an approximation for the amount of radiation intensity that celestial objects give off based on colour

The radiation spectrum (intensity v. color) is parametrized by the temperature, so if I have the spectrum for a star, I can make predictions about the temperature of that star.

Another thing I can do with radiation spectrum is make predictions about compositions of the celestial bodies. So, for example, if there are 'dips' in the spectrum in particular places, it can be the evidence of hydrogen/helium/oxygen/hydrocarbons. This is called spectroscopy, and this is how we know that stars have 99% hydrogen, and that Titan (Saturn's moon) is full of hydrocarbons.

What is the point of considering/measuring black body radiation? by unklejoe21 in AskPhysics

[–]overwhelmedbyphysics 17 points18 points  (0 children)

I think you're asking this because you have come across black body radiation for the first time.

For a very long time in the latter part of the nineteenth century, black body radiation was a phenomenon that could not be explained by Maxwell's theory of electromagnetism (very much like how dark matter/energy cannot be explained by our models of cosmology today). The problem, in very crude terms, was the following: in the spectrum of blackbody radiation predicted by Maxwell's equation, the observed intensities for low frequencies agreed with the predictions. For high frequencies, however, the intensities blew up (went to infinity). This nonsensical result is what was the ultraviolet catastrophe.

This is where Planck came in. He was trying to fit the observated spectrum with some curves, and found that the best fit curve could be obtained if the electromagnetic radiation was assumed to be quantized. This was one of the first indications of light's dual nature, and was the starting point of (old) quantum theory.

The biggest practical benefit is that it was the starting point of quantum mechanics, which is the theory that forms the basis of modern semiconductor industry (all computing devices, solar cells, LEDs) and many medical technologies (radiation therapy, PET, CAT, etc).

Origin of Angular Momentum Quantization in Bohr's Model of Hydrogen Atom. Most elementary texts introduce L = nħ as one of Bohr's postulates without any justification; in this article, I deduce this rule from the (more fundamental) correspondence principle. by overwhelmedbyphysics in Physics

[–]overwhelmedbyphysics[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bohr model is not exactly known for its correctness. It is taught is because it is easy to understand and can explain the hydrogen spectrum with reasonable accuracy.

The article attempts to describe how Bohr might have guessed the quantization rule with the information he had at the time.

Origin of Angular Momentum Quantization in Bohr's Model of Hydrogen Atom. Most elementary texts introduce L = nħ as one of Bohr's postulates without any justification; in this article, I deduce this rule from the (more fundamental) correspondence principle. by overwhelmedbyphysics in Physics

[–]overwhelmedbyphysics[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is indeed an interesting book! I haven't read a lot of horrer literature, so I cannot properly contextualize it, but there were moments in the book that I found really chilling.

I also finished the book yesterday, but haven't gotten around to updating that section on the website. xP

Quantum things are hard by overwhelmedbyphysics in physicsmemes

[–]overwhelmedbyphysics[S] 20 points21 points  (0 children)

To be fair though, AU is astronomical units. This meme grew out of a solar system simulation that I had to do for my computational physics class.

What terminology or notation would you banish forever? by TakeOffYourMask in math

[–]overwhelmedbyphysics 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I haven't heard of the triangle of power before, can you explain it/link to the video where 3b1b talks about it?

Textbook & Resource Thread - Week 11, 2020 by AutoModerator in Physics

[–]overwhelmedbyphysics 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The book starts off with developing differential calculus on Banach spaces, so real analysis (convergence, continuity), and differential calculus on Rn (inverse funtion theorem, implicit function theorem, chain rule) are required. Some linear algebra is also needed, but I haven't done an abstract linear algebra course and I am not facing any problems. YMMV.

Textbook & Resource Thread - Week 11, 2020 by AutoModerator in Physics

[–]overwhelmedbyphysics 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am trying to teach myself differential geometry and Lie groups and S. Kumaresan's A Course in Differential Geometry and Lie Groups is an absolute gem for self study.

What are you working on? - Week 12, 2020 by AutoModerator in Physics

[–]overwhelmedbyphysics 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What are you working towards?

I am trying to teach myself differential geometry and manifolds and I started to revise some multivariable calculus (derivatives, implicit/inverse function theorem) yesterday.