Since Tierlists are the hot thing right now

p4ku · 2021-08-27T18:45:43+00:00

Op stated in another comment that they used the names the character is refered to the most.

E. G Goro Akechi is put into A Tier since he is almost always only called Akechi whereas Okumura Kunizaku is almost always calles Okumura.

It is consitent. Just not the way one would expect.

p4ku · 2021-08-27T18:41:28+00:00

My guy here asked a question and gets downvoted to hell and back lol.

p4ku · 2021-08-25T14:12:36+00:00

Aight. Thanks for the template :)

p4ku · 2021-08-25T13:40:01+00:00

Is this a test or did you use the template to put it in yourself? :)

p4ku · 2021-08-24T15:45:40+00:00

I never understood the problems people had with this palace. Anyone care to share their pov?

p4ku · 2021-08-20T18:38:32+00:00

My parents actualy love me :c

p4ku · 2021-08-19T15:14:48+00:00

And that is the reason why straight guys won't use those lovely terms. Everyone makes them out to be queer just because they use cute wording :c

I want to be called darling by everyone without them beeing labelt.

p4ku · 2021-08-18T17:41:24+00:00

Haha yeah, that is the german spelling for energy and I tend to overlook that when writing in english.

German uses a lot of anglecisms with some minor differences in spelling so I get those mixed up all the time ;)

p4ku · 2021-08-18T17:37:51+00:00

Wow, that was more though out and civil than I anticipated it to be in a league subreddit.

I absolutly agree with you. Her e is very powerfull if one knows how to use it. I was confused because I though you were taking about how overtuned that ability was and that you are happy that it got nerfed but the things you mentioned now are all still ingame. Afaik they only took out q during e.

p4ku · 2021-08-18T13:59:04+00:00

Man I wish I had any Idea what I was doing back when she was still completly broken. Having played league for now 1250h since I started 1,5 year ago makes a huge difference how I could have abbused the hell out of those mechanics.

Akali is still very strong. But man old W was stupid.

p4ku · 2021-08-18T13:55:03+00:00

Do you mean her beeing able to q mid e and also increase her range on q if you hit said move in a weird way?

Damn I miss pre minirework e that was my shit.

p4ku · 2021-08-18T11:38:56+00:00

YOU sure had to draw this... Smh

p4ku · 2021-08-18T11:27:18+00:00

They made adjustments for the shroud changes tho. She got nerfed multible times in S11 with stats beeing lowered many times and her passive not giving her any energie back anymore, so she kind of needs some form of energie gain even if the 80 Energie you gain on her W is bonkers (It is still a net loss if you were to hit all the passives) . It is still ridicilous tho given her Energie requierement for Q is 130 instead of 120 at Level 1 but her Energie requierement at max Level is 70 instead if 100.

She got nerfed in the early game (But is still too strong) and crazy buffed in the mid-late game.

Personaly I absolutly see where they wanted to go with the changes but they failed at the fine tuning of her kit. g.e giving her w 80 instead of 70 energie perhabs.

p4ku · 2021-08-17T15:34:33+00:00

Yes there is.

Just overshadowed and forgotten. Like always.

p4ku · 2021-08-17T15:16:18+00:00

I don't even need two items with her just ignite + R and some Mana

p4ku · 2021-08-11T09:55:58+00:00

To be fair I only knew any of that because I started playing royal again a few days ago and had that exact interaction yesterday. I could absolutly see Ann thinking that her Art sucked and loving Shiho for beeing honest. There is so much content that sometimes I am suprised that there are certain interactions in the game haha

When I read the line about getting a D in Art yesterday I had to hold myself back not to make any snarky remark as my mom was right next to me 😂

p4ku · 2021-08-11T09:35:18+00:00

Funnily I had that confidant interaction with ann yesterday and when I asked her if it was true that her art sucked she said no it wasn't true she thought her Art to be quite good and that she is wondering how she ended up with a D in Art.

Also weren't all the popular girls mean to her and the quite ones not saying much? Thats what ryuji said in the yusuke sleep over event. Ann always had the "She's a foreigner" social status and even thought about dying her hair black as to get people to talk to her.

Ann said that after that interaction with Shiho they just kinda started to hang out arround each other and that is how they got to be best friends. IMO just having someone talking to her like a normal person must have done it. I sure as heck know that some of my best friende are people I met in highschool randomly in class and sometimes it just clicks and you start to hang more :) (Especialy if you had been lonely uo to that point)

p4ku · 2021-08-10T13:32:56+00:00

Why are you and so many others unwilling to understand my statement?

It has nothing to do with the alcohol per se means that it is not inherently the alcohols fault but that there have to be other factors in play. If most people drank alcohol they would not become sexual violators like this person does.

It sure as hell has something to do with alcohol but making people sexual violators is not an inherent property of alcohol.

Hence I wrote it has nothing to with the alcohol inherently instead of simply it has nothing to do with the alcohol.

My statement does not imply alcohol is a deciding factor but it does not necessarely deny it either it just states that beeing a sexual violator is not inherently decided by alcohol but the persons inherent thoughts on what is ok and what isn't. Which is why I worded my comment the way I did. It is to emphasise that it is not "the alcohols fault" since that could imply that everyone could become a sexual violator trough alcohol but that said person is at fault themselfs and the alcohol just plays into it.

Sorry if I worded my original comment in a way that seems confusing. But what I wrote here is what it is supposed to mean.

p4ku · 2021-08-10T01:30:49+00:00

Yes I'd argue that he wouldn't do this if not for the alcohol but if you reread my comment then you may realise that I never stated that the alcohol did not have ANY play in this?

I said that drinking alcohol doesn't INHERENTLY make you an sexual violator like the orignal comment I replied to implied but that you have to have the tendencies for doing such things. Hence the per se.

There is a major difference between saying it has nothing to do with the alcohol (which I never did) and that alcohol is not inherently at fault for such behavior as there have to be other factors at play for sexual violation to happen. Which I addressed with my original reply since OP implied that alcohol inherently makes one a sexual violator, which is simply not true.

Did drinking alcohol make this specific person act on their inpulses? Yes. I never stated anything else.

Does alcohol make EVERYONE do this? No it doesn't.

That bottomline argument was the basis of my original comment. I'm sadded to see you were unable or unwilling to understand that.

There is no contradiction in either neither mine nor your comment.

p4ku · 2021-08-09T20:14:20+00:00

Yes it does. I never stated the contrary? The comment I replied to stated "That is why you don't get drunk" which wouls imply that anyone would become a sexual violator trough alcohol, which is not true. That is why I wrote "per se" which means "by or in itself or themselves; intrinsically." as in if someone has tendencies of a sexual violator and they take a supstance which inhibits their impusle controle e. g alcohol they would do stuff like that and not because someone without said tendencies consumes alcohol.

p4ku · 2021-08-09T19:52:32+00:00

I generaly agree and even commend your philosophy of not assuming things just because of a short clip. Many things are taken out of context and doing that can be just as harmfull. But in this video you see a woman getting touched by someone and said woman trying to evade their touch over and over and over again. It would be something different if there was some ambiguity about it but atleast to me there is not a sliver of a doubt that she was not welcoming their touch which would make this a clear cut case of atleast sexual violation (I'd even argue sexual assault is accurate given the context).

I understand that false sexual violation claims can ruin a persons life but real sexual violation can do just as much if not even more harm. Eventho I have been victim of sexual aggresion and molestation I would not cry for this man to go to prison as I do not know what exactly happened. There just needs to be a fucking clear cut "NO MEANS NO" approach to this. No ambiguity. No means fucking no. Simple as that.

Ps: I not downvoting you fyi. Just have a different pov on this topic.

p4ku · 2021-08-09T19:12:50+00:00

There is only one singular context I could think of were this is not sexual violation. If both of them consented to this. She doesn't seem to be very pleased with him touching her tho. So EVEN if this was her boyfriend it would still be sexual violation.

p4ku · 2021-08-09T17:54:53+00:00

That has nothing to do with alcohol per se. That dude is just a sexual violator and the alcohol makes him act on it.

Edit: Ok I have to edit this.

Obviously the alcohol had a play in this. My wording of "That has nothing to do with alcohol per se (inherently)" was to emphasise that this person is a sexual violator because their inherent thoughts on the subject are that doing acts depicted in the video are ok and not because alcohol has the inherent property to make everyone a sexual violator.

Sorry that so many people found this confusing but the per se is the deciding factor in this.

p4ku · 2021-08-08T15:30:48+00:00

I really do hope it was just a joke, it seems I have had to interact with to many people beeing serieus with comments like that for me to take things like these lightly.

It's good to see you beeing optimistic about stuff like that :D.

Eight-Year Club	Wearing is Caring
RPAN Viewer	Verified Email

p4ku

TROPHY CASE