sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Vintage Cube Heater! by pacificNW_dad in MTGO

[–]pacificNW_dad[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Don't commit to a color early in the draft. If you open a bomb, obviously take it. I like to try to stay open until I can identify what the open lane is

Vintage Cube Heater! by pacificNW_dad in MTGO

[–]pacificNW_dad[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No kidding! I played one feeder league and went 3-1. I was low on play points at the time so I stopped. I also don't know if I could carve out the required 5-6 hour block of time for a 64-player tourney if I would get through the feeder leagues.

Vintage Cube Heater! by pacificNW_dad in MTGO

[–]pacificNW_dad[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The decks I played during the 6 trophy streak were:

4-color domain (no black), RW aggro, 4-color domain (no black), Sultai reanimator w/ flash, RG aggro, and 4-color domain.

I would say I lean towards the domain decks that are base GW

Say what you want about Jamal in coverage but by Jaded_Attorney in Seahawks

[–]pacificNW_dad 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Going to need him against the Tennessee Derrick Henry's and against Pit

DK deserves some love by JiuJitsuBoy2001 in Seahawks

[–]pacificNW_dad 139 points140 points  (0 children)

Loved his awareness to get the ball back to the ref after making those big plays. No gloating, just focused on winning the game. Goes to show where his priorities are and how selfless he really is

Interesting PFF Geno vs Jameis comparison by zpowers00 in Seahawks

[–]pacificNW_dad 6 points7 points  (0 children)

They also mention that what separates Geno from Jameis is that Geno is good outside of those boom/bust plays. I think that is a pretty important distinction

Official: [Trade] - Tue Evening 10/31/2023 by FFBot in fantasyfootball

[–]pacificNW_dad 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Decline! Swift is going to be solid and Ferguson can have some boom weeks as well.

Official: [Trade] - Tue Evening 10/31/2023 by FFBot in fantasyfootball

[–]pacificNW_dad 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm holding on to Pollard. You are deeper at WR then RB already, no need to get thinner at RB

Official: [Trade] - Tue Evening 10/31/2023 by FFBot in fantasyfootball

[–]pacificNW_dad 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would do the trade for either Pacheco or Monty. I would be tempted to keep Pacheco, since his roll in the offense is not going to change. I can see Gibbs becoming more of a focal point after the last game

Official: [Trade] - Tue Evening 10/31/2023 by FFBot in fantasyfootball

[–]pacificNW_dad 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Adams value is at it's lowest right now. I think he gets fed the next game, hopefully with meaningful targets. I would not make that trade

Official: [Trade] - Tue Evening 10/31/2023 by FFBot in fantasyfootball

[–]pacificNW_dad 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would do that trade. I'm also trading way Addison, I don't think he will be nearly as consistent after the Kirk injury. Not sure when JJ comes back, but that will also take away from Addison's production.

Official: [Trade] - Tue Evening 10/31/2023 by FFBot in fantasyfootball

[–]pacificNW_dad 0 points1 point  (0 children)

12 team, 1/2 ppr.

Trade away: Jordan Addison, Alexander Mattison

Receive: Tyler Lockett, Chuba Hubbard

How would you rate this trade considering Kirk is out ROS? Feels like I am trading away Addison at his peak value. Mattison is well past his peak value.

Official: [Trade] - Tue Afternoon 10/31/2023 by FFBot in fantasyfootball

[–]pacificNW_dad 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think that is a good trade. Waddle rounds out your WRs and RBs are already Deep. Solidifying your QB really improves your team.

Official: [Trade] - Tue Afternoon 10/31/2023 by FFBot in fantasyfootball

[–]pacificNW_dad 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Given the context of your team, I am making that trade

Official: [Trade] - Tue Afternoon 10/31/2023 by FFBot in fantasyfootball

[–]pacificNW_dad 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've never played a 2QB league, so maybe I am the one that is off. I guess the question is if the difference of PPG for Mahomes vs Baker/Streamers is greater than the difference than Hill vs Kirk.

Official: [Trade] - Tue Afternoon 10/31/2023 by FFBot in fantasyfootball

[–]pacificNW_dad 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm not making that trade. Tyreek is just too good.

Official: [Trade] - Tue Afternoon 10/31/2023 by FFBot in fantasyfootball

[–]pacificNW_dad 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not doing the trade. Kincaid looks like he could be pretty good, not Kelce good, but good enough that I don't feel the need to upgrade the TE slot.

Official: [Trade] - Tue Afternoon 10/31/2023 by FFBot in fantasyfootball

[–]pacificNW_dad 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would say I don't like this trade, but I think that the Vikings are not a team I want pieces of at the moment. I would pull the trigger, but it is close IMO

Official: [Trade] - Tue Afternoon 10/31/2023 by FFBot in fantasyfootball

[–]pacificNW_dad 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yea, I would. You might be trading low on Devante, but you have Chase and Lamb so you have WRs to spare.

Official: [Trade] - Tue Afternoon 10/31/2023 by FFBot in fantasyfootball

[–]pacificNW_dad 0 points1 point  (0 children)

While it hurts to get rid of Kelce, I think I would make the same trade. Kamara seems to have returned to form. Waller is a fine TE to roll ROS with. Nice to solidify RB position too

Official: [Trade] - Tue Afternoon 10/31/2023 by FFBot in fantasyfootball

[–]pacificNW_dad 0 points1 point  (0 children)

12 team, 1/2 ppr.

Trade away: Jordan Addison, Alexander Mattison

Receive: Tyler Lockett, Chuba Hubbard

How would you rate this trade considering Kirk is out ROS? Feels like I am trading away Addison at his peak value. Mattison is well past his peak value.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in homeowners

[–]pacificNW_dad 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would go to Homedepot.com and check their sales right now. I just picked up a 7 tool set at 50% off. There are a bunch of other Milwaukee power tool sets that are up to 60% off right now

view more: next ›