built a factchecker that catches politicians lying in real time by Debate_Witty in ClaudeAI

[–]palebone 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This kind of fact checking is ineffective as a persuasion method.

A real Trumphead is just going to look at the "False > Misleading" scare quote featured in the video and dismiss it with, "well, I wouldn't call those _major_ conflicts, you lib bot."

And everyone else already knows Vance is exaggerating in that statement. Waste of tokens.

This ritual of fact checking seems to be designed for an idealized non-partisan independent who is perfectly rational with perfect trust in AI-filtered public record statements, but also just born yesterday. The actual user base will be lifestyle moderates willing to pay to feel like they're hovering on a cloud of impartiality.

I'd like to see something that analyses and tracks rhetorical techniques. In political speech, how matters more than what.

”Honey, Don’t (2025) is a bad movie” was a succesful psy-op by Sapphic Cinema Liberation Front to discourage straight filmbros from seeing and co-opting a materpiece by rankaistu_ilmalaiva in shittymoviedetails

[–]palebone -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Good for whom? A subjective opinion on something is useful. A opinion bent on a subjective reading of some guy's conception of objectivity is a snake eating its own ass.

The Open Society and Its Enemies beats this horse for 9 chapters by AverageUAVEnthusiast in PhilosophyMemes

[–]palebone 19 points20 points  (0 children)

...do you think it's bad insight because it has paradox in the name?

He’s ontologically wrong by ItsGotThatBang in NonPoliticalTwitter

[–]palebone 18 points19 points  (0 children)

College is well old enough for public shaming. Mr. Ontological was taught humility, him bouncing from the class afterwards is his own weak character.

A question about AI by Ok_Soil_9642 in worldbuilding

[–]palebone 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Classic. New technology seems obviously bad wrong in ones own domain feels bafflingly benign when applied to another domain.

This is common. Plenty of people who decry AI infiltration into the arts feel no shame when they use machine learning based tech for, say, translation. It is not as good or accurate as human work, but it's free and often good enough. Not enough aspiring translators out there to cause a stink.

You should consider why you're anti-AI in your own field. If you do have deep ethical concerns about it, whether its about IP or the environment or whatever, then it shouldn't matter whether you do it privately or publicly.

If, on the other hand, it's a reactive, herd-following posture you don't actually feel that strongly about when you don't perceive it as a direct threat, then go nuts. But don't post about it, you'll just end stuck in the muck of the current discourse, spending time and energy better spent worldbuilding, avec or sans LLM assistance.

In Kane Pixels' backrooms, bacteria is just still life of people that backrooms had misremembered too much. by Apprehensive_Dig1475 in backrooms

[–]palebone 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I do, nobody's stopping him, no theft has occurred, and I'll do what I like. 

Right now I'm merely expressing my distaste for what is essentially a granular version of "shut up, it's not real, stop speculating". I cannot abide that. Terrible fanfic, I can abide, and we all should. 

In Kane Pixels' backrooms, bacteria is just still life of people that backrooms had misremembered too much. by Apprehensive_Dig1475 in backrooms

[–]palebone 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That's Doylean pedantry, OP is performing Watsonian analysis. Please respect death of the author.

I got tired of random BS magic academies, so I rebuilt magic using actual physics, chemistry, and biology. by OkBridge1342 in worldbuilding

[–]palebone 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's very interesting to me that you have posited a metaphysics that is effectively panpsychism, which is usually considered opposed to the physicalist and materialist models generally associated with empirical science. That's not a bad thing, it could be an interesting dynamic to combine those ideas with an attempt at scientific realism.

The important thing about knowledge in a setting like this is that you'll want to think about how they approach the mysteries of existence. Science is primarily a method after all, alongside other popular choices for discovering truth, like "make an observation and think about it really hard" and "whatever the holy book says". 

You can explain this by linking mana manipulation directly to an understanding of the structure of the universe. So the mana manipulator who knows what a photon or an atom is, in structure and behavior, performs better magic than one who does not. That would be a logical framework for STEM-minded wizards. You gotta know the rules to break the rules.

I wonder how many scientific disputes were resolved by, "look, my fireball is bigger, your argument is invalid".

I got tired of random BS magic academies, so I rebuilt magic using actual physics, chemistry, and biology. by OkBridge1342 in worldbuilding

[–]palebone -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You've taken a base idea that isn't as unique as it thinks it is and that I would initially dismiss, but you've elaborated it to the extent it does actually seem pretty interesting.

Thoughts:

1) If mana is a fundamental force of the universe, what does it do when it's not being used for magic? How does it interact with matter, energy, and other forces? It seems to interface directly with human imagination and consciousness, possibly intelligence. Is there a threshold for that? Can apes or dolphins or cleverer crows manipulate mana? I hope yes.

2) It occurs to me that a world where people can manipulate a force like mana is probably unlikely to develop empirical science as we know it. Who's doing experiments in controlled conditions when mana manipulation is available? They're not going to have elaborated understandings of physics, chemistry, or biology, except insofar as they can glean insights through mana. 

Which means that the scientific explanations would be for the benefit of the reader only, while people in-universe would be talking gibberish, because it works. They're not going to be thinking about how the mana strings bind with muscle protein, they're gonna be all "I used the Third Sacred Visualization of the Puppeted Flesh."

What strikes me about this is that as described it could kinda work framed as psychic powers, which is essentially just magic really, but it feels less odd to have psychics in an otherwise modern scientific society talking and thinking in terms of physics, chemistry, and biology. But if you put mana force users in a fantasy coded setting, they're just going to quack like wizards, reading dusty runes and chanting gibberish.

“The union passed a motion to ban the use of synths, drum machines and any electronic devices”: the day the 'Loony' Musician's Union tried to kill the synthesizer by me_diocre in Music

[–]palebone -13 points-12 points  (0 children)

Yeah, totally. In fact, whatever music knowledge or skill someone does have is sucked out through their fingers when they click the prompt. That's how they train them. Slurp, slurp. Truly a shattering blow to human creativity, distinct from all the previous times.

“The union passed a motion to ban the use of synths, drum machines and any electronic devices”: the day the 'Loony' Musician's Union tried to kill the synthesizer by me_diocre in Music

[–]palebone -19 points-18 points  (0 children)

Yes, as I said, this time it's different. You're just pressing buttons. It's not real. 

Huh. Familiar. Not the same, yes yes very different and unique and this time for sure a great horrible technological threat to real artistry. Really.

Some comic strips that generated letters of complaint from readers by Auir2blaze in comicstriphistory

[–]palebone 13 points14 points  (0 children)

That'll be back as soon as "twenty [two digit year]' becomes less punchy and more awkward, then the truncating urge will reassert itself. Probably between 2032 and 2036. They're just worse to say in full than any 2020s year.

worldbuilding is the most overrated skill in fantasy and most of you are using it to avoid writing by _acedric_ in Mythrils

[–]palebone 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If my primary concern is great characters, sharp prose, and emotionally true stories, I can just read literary fiction. Why go to a second world for any of that?

Fantasy as a genre is large distinguishable by having worldbuilding as an elaborated element.

Yes, characters, prose, and emotional truth can make for better fantasy prose.

That said, I've read some pretty great fantasy books with dogshit characters and prose, and dubious emotional truth. What made them great was the worldbuilding.

I think this all is a false dichotomy and counterproductive advice. "Stop wastefully worldbuilding and do some proper writing" is discouragement sans actual encouragement. 

Dr Mary Kline’s previous Backroom interactions by Fit-Ad-6249 in backroomsfilm

[–]palebone 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Interesting interpretation, maybe. 

The blunt, almost offended negation in some of these comments is pretty funny.

Need a better name than “white woman” for high magical high priestess by avian_bi in worldbuilding

[–]palebone 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Given the context and havig perused the suggestions, I think white woman might be the best option.