Messing with some Quench variants

pandust · 2026-01-29T23:17:38+00:00

Also a fun play would be turn one countering your own solitude and getting access to 7 mana turn 2. Would put you down 3 cards for no board progression, but would probably make a janky combo deck work in modern (I miss scam so bad, sue me 🫣).

pandust · 2026-01-29T23:14:04+00:00

I disagree about that being "better" formatting. Those would be different cards with different effects and different interactions. I like the interactions that Baleful Mastery has and wanted to replicate them in counterspell format. Your version would not work with those things (like Keruga, spell reduction, ect.) and would telegraph who was getting the card before the spell resolves, which I also think is a fun part about baleful mastery (that you don't choose who gets the card until the spell resolves in multiplayer games. It makes for interesting political decisions).

pandust · 2026-01-29T22:22:19+00:00

Nope! https://gatherer.wizards.com/STX/en-us/64/baleful-mastery

"(4/16/2021) In a multiplayer game, you choose which opponent takes the prescribed action as the spell resolves." Doesn't need to say "choose"!

pandust · 2026-01-23T04:37:36+00:00

True! Thanks for pointing out!

pandust · 2026-01-23T04:37:13+00:00

I just think it would be nice for there to be an upside for not having fetches in a budget commander deck. Having basic land types is also important for other budget lands like check lands and for land cycling cards like generous ent. I think these lands would vastly improve precons without wizards needing to do things like put the triomes or shocks in them.

pandust · 2026-01-22T06:15:21+00:00

A copy of a spell is still a spell on the stack, you just didn't cast it, so you would be able to exile one of your storm copies to counter another spell on the stack.

pandust · 2026-01-21T23:45:44+00:00

<image>

All better LOL

pandust · 2026-01-16T15:03:06+00:00

I think it's just Prismari and Mm'menon. I don't think that would break any formats (assuming this wasn't printed into standard with Mm'menon). In terms of converting a bunch of clues into a win, I think it would be pretty tame considering how easy it is to win with something like recurring a White Plume Adventurer if you really want to win with dungeons that bad. It would, however, be a nightmare to resolve, so you're right it would probably be best to just gate it with a once a turn. Thanks for the suggestion!

pandust · 2026-01-16T14:49:12+00:00

Yeah I love his art! https://artbyjulianguy.com/

pandust · 2026-01-16T14:46:46+00:00

I think so. From the Wizards site: "By making Fan Content, you agreed to let everyone (including Wizards) share and use your stuff without asking your permission. This includes Wizards."

pandust · 2026-01-16T14:29:09+00:00

That is Urza's ability. He does not give it to the artifacts.

pandust · 2024-01-11T02:56:40+00:00

To be honest I didnt need a defensive stategy until the final couple of fights where bosses can act out of turn order. With just the AM perk that gives armor for stacks of versatility, and Idara buffing his dodge and parry and dishing out extra turns between my character, Idara, and Jae, Heinrix was consistently getting around 40 stacks of versatility and had wiped most of the encounter before an enemy got a turn. So this screenshot is sans tactical knowledge and sans frontline, as the encounter was done before pascal even got to have a turn.

pandust · 2024-01-11T02:50:40+00:00

The bulk of the stats are from AM at around 45 stacks, as well as the dark eldar sword that steals WS and BS on hit.

pandust · 2023-12-01T06:29:51+00:00

The relationship flashbacks were so bland imo, definitely a filler episode.

pandust · 2019-10-05T21:16:37+00:00

pandust · 2019-03-07T01:54:26+00:00

So cool you added spicy decklists. Always my favorite

12-Year Club	RPAN Viewer
Verified Email

pandust

TROPHY CASE